User talk:Steevven1

Welcome, Steevven1!

Hello, and

welcome to Wikipedia

! Thanks for your contributions!
You might like to check out

our tutorial

, a resource created especially for new users like yourself.
You also may want to introduce yourself to the community at the new user log.
I would suggest a look through our policies and guidelines.
If you have any questions, you can ask me on

my talk page, or at our questions forum

.
I hope very much you enjoy being here with us, and I wish you luck with your contributions.

- Zapptastic at 09:10, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Steevven1, you have uploaded 5 images with watermarks. This is a violation of Wikipedia's image policy [[1]] "Also, user-created images may not be watermarked, distorted, have any credits in the image itself or anything else that would hamper their free use, unless, of course, the image is intended to demonstrate watermarking, distortion etc. and is used in the related article. All photo credit should be in a summary on the image description page.". Please replace the images with non-watermarked versions, instructions for replacing them are on the policy page under "editing images" Cheers Clappingsimon talk 00:44, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replacing the images. Cheers Clappingsimon talk 15:34, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock of 65.35.18.126 lifted or expired. Request handled by:  Netsnipe  ►  18:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Carleth and Steven Keys.jpg

I have responded at

Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images#January 20. Thank you for notifying me. --MECU≈talk 04:52, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

I replied. --MECU≈talk 14:39, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I replied again, PUIdispute tag removed from image. Thank you for your calmness and cooperating throughout this. --MECU≈talk 16:34, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry about that. I didn't know. Cheers though. ~Switch ^t 19:48, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I missed the uw- part. Thanks. I saw you warned him by hand; it's quicker with the templates, and it makes it easier for admins to see if he has been warned up until the final level 4. If you haven't found them, you can find them @

Sorry about the spelling and grammar errors. I didn't cite the wording I added, as the site I would have used(www.fourfa.com) was already listed at the end of the section. Would it be ok to upload the edit again if it was corrected and cited? Slag 10 03:26, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have

I removed the expiration date from the tag to make it a little harder for the vandals to figure out when they can go back at it. It will still expire in a week (see article log). If the vandalism continues after a week, go back to

WP:RPP and request a longer semi-protection. --rogerd 19:37, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Regards Bjorn9800991 16:34, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can't believe that no one has mentioned it here. I just want to comment on what a good job you did with the

Please do not re-create a redirect from Steven Keys to your user page. Redirects to user pages are not permissible. People are either notable enough for an article or they are not. Let me know if you have questions. Thanks. -- JLaTondre 01:25, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanna say I think your cool. Lol I used ur long hair emo pic to tell my barber how to cut mine. And your only eleven days older than me. Rock on.

The image you've replaced the older image with isn't an infant, it's way too old to be an infant. It's a toddler. And he isn't looking at a shiny object, he's looking at the camera (or the flash of the camera obviously attracts) --Arad 06:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Photographer-Copyeditor's Barnstar
		A double-barnstar for photographic contributions to Wikipedia and completely rewriting Emo (slang). ~Switch t c g 06:13, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply ]

Hi, I don't understand your rv explanation for [2] - I didn't remove it, and agree that it's a common criticism, I merely moved it to the "Criticism" section. Mdwh 17:30, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah okay, I've seen you've fixed it now, thanks. Mdwh 17:31, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just because the video doesn't work, doesn't mean that the source cannot be used. I am merely using that source as proof that the sketch actually exists, not for a place to view the video. Thanks. --Ali'i 14:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I wanted to point you to Wikipedia:Image_use_policy#User-created_images. I've noticed that a couple of the images you've created for use on Wikipedia pages feature advertising for your website, in a manner that is dubious, if not apparently intentional. The images in question are (Image:Emo beat up chuck taylor all star converse.jpg) and (Image:A-ok sign.JPG). I first noticed the shoe one, and replaced it, and then discovered the other. I intend to modify and replace the second one as well. It seems to violate policy to have distracting or self-promotional content unnecessarily (and seemingly deliberately) in the background or elsewhere in images used on Wikipedia. You seem to be aware of policy, reflected in your editing of (Image:Emo). I'm not trying to be contentious or anything, just giving you a heads up. --Cheeser1 07:43, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,

you look hot in your emo pic. --Entrailsofanangel 01:17, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there mate, great spelling of your name, I spell mine with a v but have a look at this discussion I was having earlier, bottom of the page. I need not ask you "why the w?"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Latin_alphabet

SPTimoshenko 06:30, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I really think your emo hair style is so wicked awesome. Why'd you cut it??? :(

Anyways, rock the world, dude. --Éowyn Alestrii 00:03, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you looked better with long hair. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.188.242.228 (talk) 06:39, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, do you have a sole image of your nice converse? If you do can you leave it up on the converse page, love the shoes! thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.24.215.180 (talk) 02:04, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have no idea how good it feels to be acknowledged, even on such a minor scale. Thank you!

http://www.myspace.com/hakerm —Preceding unsigned comment added by Root value (talk • contribs) 22:49, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can verify the football section. I was on the team from day one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hurley1080 (talk • contribs) 04:52, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be a lot of talk about how your hair used to be across your face, but I would just like to say I am failing to see how that looks like "emo hair" at all, I mean for one it's not black for two it's cut wrong upon the sides and furthermore just looks bad. The image should just be deleted for the sake of examples based on Wikipedia's part if that's all you were using the pictures for because based on WikiMedia there are a lot better examples within the database. • GunMetal Angel 08:53, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article 3 Beads of Sweat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable record label

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JayJay^{Talk to me} 23:26, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I working on a project for the Environmental Volunteers in Palo Alto, CA and came across your Muscovy Duck image. I am very interested in using this for our bird identification presentation at their EcoCenter. I would like to credit you properly. If you could contact me at [email protected] I would appreciate it.

Anna McElheny [email protected] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.181.214.178 (talk) 01:02, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Steevven1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged DB Studios for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 00:34, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Star Trek: Continuum. Since you had some involvement with the Star Trek: Continuum redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 15:49, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hello, Steevven1. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on CardRates.com, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See
  Wikipedia:FAQ/Business
  for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See
  section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
  .

]

Orphaned non-free image File:DatingAdvice.com Logo.png

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:55, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That article was deleted. Feel free to delete the image immediately, as it no longer qualifies for fair use. Steevven1 ^{(Talk) (Contribs) (Gallery)} 21:36, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cardrates logo.png

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That article was deleted. Feel free to delete the image immediately, as it no longer qualifies for fair use. Steevven1 ^{(Talk) (Contribs) (Gallery)} 20:01, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Microfocus

Hi Steevven1, You put in a some info and ref into the above article. The ref was advertising which is against WP Terms of Use, per

WP:NOTADVERTISING. It was also a ref to blog, which is illegal. Thanks. scope_creep (talk) 22:50, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Steevven1. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edits at Mathematics

Hi Steevven1. I was wondering if you could please explain your motivation for your recent edits at Mathematics? Paul August ☎ 20:42, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Digital Brands for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Digital Brands is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital Brands until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 01:16, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of DB Studios for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DB Studios is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DB Studios until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 01:20, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 02:58, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DB Studios Inc Logo, horizontal.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Digital Brands Logo.png

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Gold dust day gecko

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Gold Dust Day Gecko closeup hawaii edit 1.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 22:33, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply ]

MfD nomination of User:Steevven1/sandbox/CardRates.com

sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Steevven1/sandbox/CardRates.com during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 16:07, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

MfD nomination of User:Steevven1/sandbox/DatingAdvice.com

sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Steevven1/sandbox/DatingAdvice.com during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 16:10, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

MfD nomination of User:Steevven1/sandbox/Digital Brands

sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Steevven1/sandbox/Digital Brands during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 16:15, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Nomination of Heavy Petty for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heavy Petty is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heavy Petty until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Newslinger talk 16:43, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at LendUp, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. — Newslinger talk 16:51, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Steevven1. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply ]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tofutti Logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Tofutti Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:24, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of

Happy Cactus

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Happy Cactus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted

.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Happy Cactus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

InDimensional (talk) 22:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]