User talk:Styrofoam1994

• I am a
  bot
  , and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:35, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!
	Hi Styrofoam1994! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the here . Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! 20:02, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Category:Onomatopoeias, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 06:31, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Shitface. Since you had some involvement with the Shitface redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 03:00, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Styrofoam1994,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Shitface for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Louieoddie (talk) 10:06, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nyet. Since you had some involvement with the Nyet redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 16:43, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grover Middle School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grover Middle School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bneu2013 (talk) 19:17, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Novo Cetvorno has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't locate any substantive sources about this song/dance. Best I found was [1], but that's one line. The source in the article is a commercial sales listing, so not an indicator of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:05, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Dambura.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

The file File:Korea Cultural Treasure 43.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• File:ThomasGroverSchool.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

The article Mystic Legend has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable composition that fails the

WP:GNG

. I was initially going to redirect this to the composer's page, but upon looking that that, there are serious notability issues there as well.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.Rorshacma (talk) 18:41, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Korea Cultural Treasure 109.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the

• File:HMS Exploit.jpg

✗plicit 11:01, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:HMS Exploit.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Seloloving (talk) 11:08, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Mainpagedelete.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused Wikipedia screenshot. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:43, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]