User talk:Sumaya AkterBD

Hello Sumaya AkterBD. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Sumaya AkterBD. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Sumaya AkterBD|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE🌈 13:49, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mccapra (talk) 05:54, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article

reliable source

that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

Actually I am new here, as you see I am new bey.I didn't understand at all about references issue.Prof Daniel Michelson is my mentor I want to make a biography of him.Can you please help me out? Sumaya AkterBD (talk) 06:41, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok sure. First off you need to know that Wikipedia has rules about biography articles. The subject of an academic biography article needs to meet the standard set out in

WP:NPROF

. then everything in the article needs to be supported by reliable independent sources. This means you can’t just copy a professor’s faculty page onto Wikipedia. You need to search for sources independent of their institution that discuss them or their work, any awards they’ve received etc. it’s quite a lot of work to do.

If you want to continue working on the Michelson article I can move it to draft space outside the main encyclopedia if you agree, and you can work in it there until it’s ready to be published. Mccapra (talk) 07:13, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PICKLEDICAE🥒 09:16, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Sumaya AkterBD. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 02:14, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]