User talk:Tabarez

Thanks for your uploads to Wikipedia. There is an issue with some of them, specifically:

• File:Fabio 2009.jpg
• File:Mohammad Abbasi.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the images because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the images, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image files themselves. Please update the image descriptions with URLs that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 21:14, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

سلام به نظر زبان مادری شما فارسی است. چرا تصویر جدید دکتر عارف رو به تصویر قدیمی تغییر میدهید؟ با تشکر — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ansarymehr (talk • contribs) 19:37, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

سلام. اولا اون عکس خیلی هم قدیمی نیست برای 2009 هست دوما استفاده از چند عکس در یک مقاله بهتر از یکی هست. Tabarez (talk) 19:41, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

بله حق با شماست، ممنونم Ansarymehr (talk) 20:04, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

من هم بابت عکس های خیلی خوبتون ممنونم واقعا به اونها احتیاج داشتیم. اگه بازهم دارید لطفا بار کنید. تشکر Tabarez (talk) 20:13, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Aleksandar Ilić (footballer) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | currentclub = [

Thanks,

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mohammad Reza Aref may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• to create a political epic and maintain the dignity of the [[Islamic Republic of Iran]].<ref>[http://tabnak.ir/fa/news/325123/%D8%B9%D8%A7%D8%B1%D9%81-%D9%81%D9%82%D8%B7-%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%B5%D8%
• 81-%D9%81%D9%82%D8%B7-%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%B5%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%81-%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%AF عارف فقط انصراف داد }</ref> On day before, [[Gholam-Ali Haddad-Adel]] withdrew from the presidential race in favor of

Thanks,

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Saeid Daghighi may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |[[2012-13 Persian Gulf Cup|12–13]]||align="left"|[[Saipa F.C.|Saipa]||2

Thanks,

Hi, If you want to keep the photo in the article, please upload a new version of that form the original source. (http://ipos.me/en/)

The current photo is only up to 6th of June, but the last version of the Graph in the mentioned reference is up to 10th of June. Regards, Koorosh1234 (talk|contribs) 09:49, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, But do you think this image will be better to move to the main article? I think this is better. Tabarez (talk) 09:51, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For me it seems OK. But it seems you still put the older version of the photo in main the article!? Koorosh1234 (talk|contribs) 14:55, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No! It's the most recently site uploaded. See the picture and the source! Tabarez (talk) 15:07, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Now it seems OK. Thanks! Koorosh1234 (talk|contribs) 17:04, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the text in Opinion polls in the main article and removed the copied materials from http://www.washingtonpost.com.

Please be careful when you edit something, in order to not delete the previous version of editions by others! Koorosh1234 (talk|contribs) 17:30, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The online polls in the article

Talk page of the article. Please do not add them again into the article up to the time that I can find a proper solution for that. Thanks. Koorosh1234 (talk|contribs) 18:07, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dariush Yazdani (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Coach

Saeed Jalili (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to British

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:00, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tabarez, I removed a large amount of content from this article for the following reasons:

1. It is in very poor English, at times it is almost impossible to tell what is trying to be said. It seems like this has been provided by a translation site rather than an individual

2. A lot of the content is very pov, stating how great Al-Ahli are without providing any sources.

3. Sources, or the lack of them are a major issue here, a fair amountof content is probably true but is not verified.

4. The long list of famous players is completely unnecessary as it has no clear inclusion criteria and is far too long anyway.

Feel free to add bits back, but please nesure they are fully sourced to reliable references. Fenix down (talk) 15:48, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Trend of Iranian election polling.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  OTRS pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:37, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

درود.... از زحماتی که بریا ویکی انگلیسی میکشی ممنونم... ولی آماری که در مورد نکونام زدی اشتباه هست، بازی های ملی نکونام 131 و گل هاش 36 تا هست. اگه خواستین مستندات رو ارائه میکنم I7-860 (talk) 17:45, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

نه احتیاجی به مستند نیست من خودم هم احساس کردم که اشتباه کردم. مرسی از توضیحتتون Tabarez (talk) 18:34, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

قابل شما رو نداشت I7-860 (talk) 21:01, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Although I've blocked you indefinitely that does not mean for ever. You need to go and read up on our copyright policy using the link above. Copying large amounts of text from a website is a copyright violation and you need to stop doing that. It is a little unusual to block so quickly but you were starting to edit war based on your misunderstanding of policy. Your comments also showed a very clear misunderstanding of both policy and the law - for example small changes like this do not stop it being a copyright violation. Given your clear misunderstanding and your history at this article I thought it best to block you until you understand our policy. Once you have shown you understand our policy you will be unblocked. Dpmuk (talk) 19:48, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's fantastic to me to know Wikipedia's policies but many users have policies in their personals here. I add references to all my copyvio edits. Also, most of policies is in English and my native languague is Persian. But blocking is not a good way for it. It just inappetence users from editing in Wikipedia! Tabarez (talk) 19:55, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Give me the time to edit the page and correct it in Wikipedia style. See the page now! I also started to removing some parts of the sources that is not good before you blocking me. An very early mistake. Tabarez (talk) 19:57, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tabarez (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Indefinitely?!!! I can't understand. I don't know that using from other websites with adding it's source is banned in Wikipedia! When I asked it from User:Farhikht, he said yes is but I don't want to remove all, as I started to removing non-encyclopedia parts! See this. This is edit of a user that you heard it's reporting of me. Is it a good reviewer? What a kidding! What happened in Wikipedia? Please explained. It was better that you warned me before blocking! Tabarez (talk) 19:51, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Re: "I don't want to remove all", we do not care what you want - we do not allow (and the law does not allow) *any* copyright violations to be added to Wikipedia articles. Until you read Wikipedia's copyright policy and understand that, and make a convincing commitment to not copy any copyrighted material from other sources, you will not be unblocked. I'm sure you are acting in good faith here, but copyright violation is a serious legal issue, so we must be sure you understand. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:13, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As I say above indefinite does not mean for ever. Once you have shown you understand policy the block will be lifted. Please go and read our

copyright policy. It doesn't matter whether you want to remove it all or not, our policy says all copyright violations need to be removed. This diff which you keep on quoting as something they did wrong was in fact a quite reasonable action on that user's part - we cannot have copyright text in an article. As you restored this text when they removed it they tried a different method which removes the text until someone else reviews it. That was a quite reasonable action. I explain above why I blocked before warning. I will leave it to another admin to review the unblock request in case they see things differently from me but I won't be unblocking until I see a clear understanding of our copyright policies. Dpmuk (talk) 19:58, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Tabarez has IMHO caused enough problems to remain blocked for ever. During the the past three weeks he has been blocked three times, including this block, has had a load of uploaded images deleted as blatant copyright violations, has edit warred 24/7 and has now also been caught copying text wholesale from various news sources. Meaning that he obviously lacks the maturity/competence needed to edit on WP. Thomas.W (talk) 20:03, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tabarez, I told you multiple times to read basic policies. And before reporting this incident I posted a message at the talk page of the article which you ignored. Honestly I'm not happy that you were blocked and again I ask you to read more about how to edit. Most of policies has been translated into Persian. You can find them on Persian Wikipedia.Farhikht (talk) 20:07, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to rephrase that a bit so that readers will understand that your comment was directed at Tabarez and not me. Thomas.W (talk) 20:11, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. Sorry. Just did it :)Farhikht (talk) 20:14, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just wants to help wikipedia and the page. I add the copyvio in request of one user. I will start to understanding this policy by reading in Persian but It will not be very longer. Blocking for ever is not a good way. We have many to do for the article. Please help me to adding and editing not to demolition me. Yes I have blocked three times, first my unblock request was accepted but in the second time it was for a edit war that I never started! And this time ...... Tabarez (talk) 20:12, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are not blocked for ever - you are only blocked until you can convince us that you understand Wikipedia's copyright policy and will not violate it -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:15, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I started to reading and understanding this policy. But when you can know that I have understand? I will not add any copyvio notes longer. Tabarez (talk) 20:20, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In the copyright policies I have read in Persian said: از آنجا که بیشتر آثاری که اخیراً تولید شده‌اند دارای حق تکثیر اند تقریباً هر مقالهٔ ویکی‌پدیا که منابعش را یاد می‌کند پیوندی به اثری مشمول حق تکثیر خواهد داشت. برای پیوند به مواد مشمول حق تکثیر نیازی به کسب اجازه صاحب آن نیست. درست همانطور که نویسندهٔ یک کتاب نیاز به کسب اجازه برای یادکرد اثر شخصی دیگر در «کتابنامهٔ» کتابش ندارد، ویکی‌پدیا نیز محدود به پیوند به مطالب بازمتن یا آزاد نیست... User:Farhikht, can you said what I doing? Am I add references or not? Also adding all of the part was not corrected but I started to removing some of them or not? Tabarez (talk) 20:18, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The text that you cited is from this article which reads Since most recently-created works are copyrighted, almost any Wikipedia article which cites its sources will link to copyrighted material. It is not necessary to obtain the permission of a copyright holder before linking to copyrighted material, just as an author of a book does not need permission to cite someone else's work in their bibliography. Likewise, Wikipedia is not restricted to linking only to CC-BY-SA or open-source content. The article talks about just "linking to copyrighted material". It doesn't mean that you can copy paste the text of the source. Please read this article.

Here you can find the original text.Farhikht (talk) 20:45, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

درسته. Farhikht من قانون رو خوندم ولی هنوزهم به کمک احتیاج دارم. میتونم بعضی موقع ها از شما کمک بخام در مسائل مشکوک؟ اگه آره پس لطفا درخواست کنید که من رو از بلاک دربیارن میدونید که در روزهای آینده کارهای زیادی برای انجام دادن داریم. تشکر Tabarez (talk) 20:52, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Per my recent experience I can't speak Persian! But I assure you that they don't listen to me. I think that maybe the best way is to edit Persian Wikipedia for some weeks. I want to make you sure that this is not a way to get rid of you.Farhikht (talk) 21:04, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=I had read and understand Wikipedia Copyright policies and also Neutral point of view and I think now is time for unblocking me. I will not add copyvio notes after that. Tabarez (talk) 10:34, 12 June 2013 (UTC)}} (Template disabled, duplicate request) Yunshui 雲‍水 13:04, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dpmuk, I still wait for my request. Please comment about it. Tabarez (talk) 05:55, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Before I'd be willing to unblock I'd like you to explain what you did wrong and what you won't do in future. I ask this so I can be sure that you've not only read but also understand the policies.

That said I'm currently away so won't be online much so am happy for any others admins to act as they see best. Dpmuk (talk) 02:15, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Graham87, can you please give response to my unblocking request? Tabarez (talk) 04:07, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No;

Asking the other parent will only make admins less inclined to unblock you. Graham87 04:28, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Dpmuk, be sure that I will never repeat these and I will be respect to Wikipedia's Copyright laws. I'm currently understanding these policies. Tabarez (talk) 03:42, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tabarez (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Understanding Wikipedia Copyright policies. Tabarez (talk) 4:45 am, Today (UTC+1)

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but saying, "I understand" is not the same as understanding. I can can easily say, "I understand

quantum physics

", but I don't (and am unlikely to, without considerable study). You will need to demonstrate an understanding of copyright before an administrator is willing to unblock you. To make it easier, try answering the following questions in your next unblock request:

• Why is copyright so important on Wikipedia?
• What sort of licence applies to Wikipedia's content?
• Where can Wikipedia copy content from?
• What is "fair use", and when does it apply?
• What does "public domain" mean?
• Can you copy content from other Wikipedia pages - if so, what's the correct procedure?
• How can you tell if another website's content is free to use on Wikipedia?

Doing so will show - rather than simply say - that you've read and, more importantly, understood the relevant pages. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:04, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dpmuk, I had wrong in my past edits in using copyvio notes, by copy pasting the notes from other websites so I linked to the reference but it was wrong. I also aksed from one user about this and he said that it's wrong but I saw his answer after blocking of me. I really don't know that it was wrong. Now I'm understanding. Tabarez (talk) 03:51, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Answers:

• Wikipedia is a free software and all texts and images must be licensed freely (CC-BY-SA and GFDL).
• License not Licence!
  Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License
  (GFDL).
• if and only if the copied version is made available on the same terms to others and acknowledgment of the authors of the Wikipedia article used is included (a link back to the article is generally thought to satisfy the attribution requirement; see below for more details).
• Fair use is one of the traditional safety valves.
• If it licensed under the country's copyright laws.
• "I can't found it in Persian article" but I think It's free if it's licensed correctly but I'm not sure.
• The only Wikipedia content I should contact the Wikimedia Foundation about is the trademarked Wikipedia/Wikimedia logos, which are not freely usable without permission.

I'm hopping to answered correctly. Tabarez (talk) 13:52, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly if that's the best you've got then I stand by my decline of your unblock; it's now very clear that you don't understand how copyright works. Yunshui 雲‍水 14:04, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Oh, and licence is the British noun form of the word, and is the correct spelling in the UK. Given the spelling and grammar exhibited throughout your contributions, I'd advise against telling others how to spell...) Yunshui 雲‍水 14:04, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a reviewer, not an admin. Just a normal user. It's not necessary for me to know all policies note by note and line by line! I just now understand that my edits have problems that I now know it. Tabarez (talk) 15:30, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also my native language is Persian and I can't explain well in English. Sorry. Tabarez (talk) 15:37, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Farhikht (talk) 10:37, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Plot Spoiler (talk) 16:37, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Your contributed article, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf presidential campaign, 2013

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page,

the article's talk page

.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by

article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Plot Spoiler (talk) 16:39, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Your contributed article, Mohammad Gharazi presidential campaign, 2013

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page,

the article's talk page

.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by

article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Plot Spoiler (talk) 16:40, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Your contributed article, Ali Akbar Velayati presidential campaign, 2013

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page,

the article's talk page

.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by

article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Plot Spoiler (talk) 16:40, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Your contributed article,

Mohsen Rezaee presidential campaign, 2013

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page,

the article's talk page

.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by

article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Plot Spoiler (talk) 16:50, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Plot Spoiler, in which part of the main article are explained about Peoples who endorsed Rezaee, his campaign headquarters, his possible cabinet and his positions?!! Please remove the tag. This article is good unless four others. Tabarez (talk) 16:54, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf campaign logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading

You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

talk) 04:59, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Saeed Jalili campaign logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading

You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

talk) 04:59, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Ali Akbar Velayati campaign logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading

You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

talk) 05:00, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into

sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tabarez, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations

, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Thomas.W ^{talk to me} 09:54, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Majid Jalali.png

Thanks for uploading File:Majid Jalali.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the
  CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list
  ) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter
  OTRS pending
  }} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 08:36, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Azadi Stadium panorama.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Azadi Stadium panorama.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 08:59, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Azadi Stadium logo.jpg.gif

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Mohammad Reza Aref.jpg

The file File:Mohammad Reza Aref.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

talk) 01:02, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of File:Rafsanjani.jpg

The file File:Rafsanjani.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the

talk) 01:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Proposed deletion of File:Karrar Jassim.JPG

The file File:Karrar Jassim.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused photo. The source file was deleted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MGA73 (talk) 17:02, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rah Ahan F.C. squad

Template:Rah Ahan F.C. squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:55, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Files listed for discussion

Some of your images or media files have been listed for discussion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 December 19 if you are interested in preserving their usage.

• File:Kianoush Rahmati.jpg
• File:Farhad Majidi on the field in 2013, Esteghlal-Damash match.jpg
• File:Pejman Nouri.jpg
• File:Jalal Rafkhaei.jpg
• File:Mohammad Ghazi.jpg
• File:Hadi Norouzi (football player, born 1985) in 2013.jpg

Thank you. — MATRIX! (a good person!)_{[citation unneeded]} 17:44, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]