User talk:TheEagle107
Adding articles to categories
Hi, you've been adding a large number of articles to
Support
Hello,
- @WP:ILL & watch this video on Wikimedia Commons:
You are most welcome, anytime. Best regards.--TheEagle107 (talk) 15:47, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Wow, you thanked me for my User page! Never had that happen before. It's a nice form of support. Martindo (talk) 21:31, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hello @Phuket in Thailand and Bali in Indonesia. Let me take this opportunity to tell you something weird: throughout my life, I've been seeing Asians women are not pretty, but recently I've started to like Japanese and Korean women in particular and find them attractive in some way. 😃 Have a good day and take care. With respect and appreciation.--TheEagle107 (talk) 00:10, 6 October 2023 (UTC)]
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
Tanbih al-Ghabi bi-Tabri'at Ibn 'Arabi External links in the body
Hi, I was reviewing your article here. I fixed it a bit so the spacing around the ref/notes area is a bit better organised. I notice your using external links in the body of the article. These are strictly illegal and are considered disruptive editing. In this case here I turn them into references. Do not use them from this point forward. If your using them in articles can you remove them. They are great article apart from that. Great series of articles indeed!! scope_creepTalk 13:28, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Barnstar for you
The Epic Barnstar | ||
Greetings, TheEagle107! I believe it's terribly careless of me to be so late in presenting you this barnstar. We appreciate your diligent and hard work on so many historical people and their works from the classical Ages. Finding and reading them is always a pleasure (and frequently results in exclamations like "At last, someone wrote about this!". May God bless you and keep going! Ayaltimo (talk) 08:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC) |
- @Ayaltimo:Thank you so much for your kind, encouraging words. Your support means the world to me! Words can't express my gratitude for your thoughtfulness, consideration, and appreciation to my efforts. I really appreciate it! You have just made my day and lifted my spirits! Thank you, thank you, thank you! 🙏 TheEagle107 (talk) 06:10, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
My apologies
Careless of me. Thank you for pointing that out. --Louis P. Boog (talk) 18:37, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
My opinion
- Some similar opinion I had given on VFF's talk page too.
- See my view has been that shifting focus from content to personal concerns benefits the accuser to take content dispute off the track. Solution is from your side give primacy to content dispute and take the discussion back to the track again at earliest.
- About personal side usually best solution meet impatience of accuser with patience. Address legitimate concerns so the other side would have less scope to continue off the track.
- Refactoring requests
- Where personal accusations are clearly factually wrong, arrogant or insulting Wikipedia has a discussion culture where in you reach out to such user at their talk page with section heading 'Refactoring requests'. Cite their specific objectionable difs, mention your concern and request them to correct their sentences. After coming such request a user is generally expected to do self introspection and drop their stick and correct their improper mentions and sentences.
- If they don't do leave it their for future users who are similarly affected from similar behavior shall take them to the task at appropriate forum with list of improper behaviour and then community warns. In my point of view this is smarter to save our own time, stress and focus.
- I hope you would find my suggestions helpful enough.
Once you go through