User talk:TheHelix0

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Kiran Uniyal instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be

proposed for deletion

. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kiran Uniyal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:12, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheHelix0! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:12, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kiran Uniyal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiran Uniyal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Tictictoc (talk) 13:19, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Tictictoc, you recently tagged an article( Kiran Uniyal ) for deletion, Please take this down. As per your concern this wikipedia article has been improved according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. And also some reliable link and resources have been added to the article. TheHelix0 (talk) 11:04, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have no objection, therefore please feel free to share the noteworthy coverage in afd. Let's see some additional thoughts from the other editors. and the outcome will be revealed in about a week. Tictictoc (talk) 16:18, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 18:50, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have updated the page as per your concern @M.Ashraf333 and also i hope you will help me to improve this page.

Please remove delete tag from the page and suggest me if any this is need to improve it. TheHelix0 (talk) 19:05, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@M.Ashraf333 you recently tagged an article for deletion, Please take this down. As per your concern this wikipedia article has been improved according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. And also some reliable link and resources have been added to the article. TheHelix0 (talk) 19:06, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@TheHelix0, Done. Removed copyrighted material and tag too, also the article is in draft space by another editor. Please improve the article in your draftspace and click submit button when its ready. Thank you M.Ashraf333 (talk) 19:20, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kiran Uniyal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiran Uniyal (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 01:36, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Fehufanga you recently tagged an article for deletion, Please take this down. As per your concern this wikipedia article has been already improved according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. And also it is not relevant to put this article for deletion again and again. If you think it is incomplete then suggest me an edit but please remove the delete tag and help to make it more better. TheHelix0 (talk) 08:10, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@

checks, I didn't find anything notable about the subject. The deletion discussion will run as normally. —*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 08:12, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2A01:4C8:A4:D8F:5E5:7B85:D0FD:F751 (talk) 09:27, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Manpreet dhir per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Manpreet dhir. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators:

IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

--Blablubbs (talk) 18:04, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, TheHelix0. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 21:01, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheHelix0. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:39, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]