User talk:TheJay123

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Who Wants to Be a Millionaire (American game show), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 14:03, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Who Wants to Be a Millionaire (American game show), you may be blocked from editing. – BrickMaster02 (talk) 16:36, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jerry Lee Lewis, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 22:18, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article

. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth
  (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent
  of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more external news articles about comparing longest tenures. Notice there isn't even a list of longest-running talk show hosts.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of longest-serving American game show/reality competition hosts (current) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
  may be deleted
  .
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:09, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheJay123! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:09, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't change the birth date templates for missing persons. Articles do not contain conjecture or supposition, they should only include what is verified to be true. In missing persons cases, the age at disappearance is what is included in the infobox, not the age the person would be if they were still alive. -- Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:09, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I assume you're the IP who has been making these changes logged-out as well, so please be aware of

WP:SOCK.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:19, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disappearance of Jeffrey Zoltowski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disappearance of Jeffrey Zoltowski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:44, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to learn more about why this article is being considered for deletion. This is the only article I've created where I have had this issue. I think the fact that Zoltowski disappeared while on vacation in what appears to be a hiking trip gone wrong seems notable (at least to some degree) plus there was a reported sighting of him in Hawaii in 2001 which is also an important fact. TheJay123 (talk) 17:00, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Go to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disappearance of Jeffrey Zoltowski and make your points there. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:03, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disappearance of Jessica Seybold is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disappearance of Jessica Seybold until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:07, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, TheJay123. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:32, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. livelikemusic (TALK!) 15:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deal or No Deal (American game show), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syndication.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 March 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Iris Apfel, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 11:31, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Artemis program. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:13, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Baltimore/Washington International Airport has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. -- Diannaa (talk) 20:50, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

I've been noticed that on 2024–25 United States network television schedule. None of the recent edits of renewals of the ABC is sourced despite claiming it was sourced. I checked out TVLine and there is no information on the ABC shows that are said to be renewed today. BattleshipMan (talk) 17:49, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed that as well. I was not the one who added that information, it was an unregistered user, so I attempted to undo it but was unsuccessful. TheJay123 (talk) 17:52, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I know that. I warned that user and I requested page protection on it. You may have to remove what was put on there manually. BattleshipMan (talk) 17:57, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The unregistered user keeps adding unsourced information with either very old sources or no sources at all. If this continues, the unregistered user's IP address may have to be blocked. It is difficult for me to undo information when the other user keeps adding useless content. TheJay123 (talk) 18:05, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I already removed them, but then the user keeps readding them. BattleshipMan (talk) 18:22, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I say we block the unregistered user, or at the very least issue a final warning. His disruptive editing is starting to get annoying and I think it needs to stop immediately. TheJay123 (talk) 18:22, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Let's do that. I've seen enough. BattleshipMan (talk) 18:39, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The user has been blocked for 31 hours. BattleshipMan (talk) 18:49, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! TheJay123 (talk) 18:50, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The user that you blocked on Monday is back making unnecessary edits. If this continues, the IP may have to be banned permanently, or for a very long period of time. TheJay123 (talk) 19:08, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]