User talk:TheSkyIsGreen

Hi TheSkyIsGreen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for

Hello, I'm Blablubbs. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Ken Penders—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. — Blablubbs ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:01, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheSkyIsGreen. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:41, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I saw there was a misunderstanding back in September (exactly 1 month ago) on the AfD page here. It looks like you were trying to dispute the point of it being unsourced by stating that the wiki would be good for sourcing. However, they were attempting to state that the subject was not

What they were trying to say is that there needs to be some coverage of the game outside of sources provided by the game developer.

You also said that the steam guides verify the content on the wiki. However, the steam guides are created by people who are not professionals/have had work published by notable secondary sources or working at a notable news website or company (

Self published sources are used as this secondary source. Primary sources are the developers making formal statements or giving formal information, which is what you were attempting to use as a secondary source.

I hope this explanation helped you understand what the other side was trying to tell you during the debate. Rafplayz001^{(talk | contribs)} 18:27, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There was a template that you left for editors to see and I tried revising the History section in a more simplified version, since it was indicated it is "better read as a prose". I did not alter any content or source, just simply the format. Any further input is welcome and if I have made a mistake feel free to undo. Just trying to help around! Yogibur (talk) 08:17, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EDG 543 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Already covered sufficiently on Timeline_for_September_following_the_September_11_attacks#Wednesday,_September_12

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:9/11 George Washington Bridge Explosives Reports and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:9/11 George Washington Bridge Explosives Reports, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thanks, EDG 543 ^{(message me)} 15:34, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheSkyIsGreen! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Thanks, EDG 543 (message me) 15:34, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, TheSkyIsGreen. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 15:39, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheSkyIsGreen. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:42, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to User:Yoshi24517. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 19:32, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to User:Yoshi24517, you may be blocked from editing. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 19:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 19:38, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

THIS CAN'T BE HAPPENING TO ME!!! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! TheSkyIsGreen (talk) 19:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SupaOHHH.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Supatalking.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:52, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Whpq (talk) 13:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not acceptable. -- Whpq (talk) 13:57, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Although it may be unacceptable and agaisnt Wikipedia's guidelines for image usage, I thought it was playful and humorous. I think it was acceptable, because, not only, did I spell Shakespeare's name correctly (I could've spelled it the more humourous way: shakespear), but I also made sure that the captions for the images were on-topic and (somewhat) accurately portrayed the cultural impact and significance of To Be or Not To Be. Additionally, Wikipedia has the guidelines WP:BOLD and WPIAR, which should be taken into consideration as well. TheSkyIsGreen (talk) 14:21, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]