User talk:The Copper Miner

Hello, The Copper Miner, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard
  if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
• The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun game-like tour to help get you oriented within Wikipedia)

You can

If you need any help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. We're so glad you're here! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:42, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make significant edits without explanation. Explain on the article talk page what your concerns are. Quis separabit? 18:27, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Because, for starters (and this may be expanded):

1. Copper Country Strike of 1913–1914
   article.
2. Nobody
   owns any article on Wikipedia.Quis separabit? 18:46, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply
   ]

OK, glad we settled the other article for now but you still haven't explained what your problems are with my edits (see [1]) on the Copper Country article, which by the way needs better sourcing. There's a lot of unreferenced claims. Quis separabit? 18:52, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, these sections/paragraphs are unsourced:

*While most of the early mines failed, a few became successful, and eventually several major mines became established. The Copper Country quickly became the first major copper mining region in the United States. By 1913, the majority of copper in the Copper Country was produced by three companies: the

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fuortu (talk) 17:37, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One cannot use Wikipedia as a reference. Wikipedia is unreliable because anybody can edit. One cannot use unreliable refs. Stop your reverting. Bgwhite (talk) 03:37, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have protected the page so you cannot edit it. If you continue to add Wikipedia refs, you will be blocked. Read

WP:USERGENERATED. When you finally understand this, the page will be unprotected. Bgwhite (talk) 01:36, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

I only respond where the discussion got started. Most editors are this way. I will ONLY respond here and will remove any message on my talk page about this subject. Once again, you cannot use ANY link to Wikipedia as a ref. Wikipedia is unreliable as it is contains user generated content. This is also the same with blogs, forums, newsgroup and other selfpublished material. The link I gave even said to not use Wikipedia as a ref. Bgwhite (talk) 05:38, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the hoax report. I have rescinded it and you can carry on. There was no international coverage, so I assumed it may have been made up.

Note the wording of the report says "MAY" be a hoax, not "IS" a hoax.

Have a nice day,

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cliff mine

added a link pointing to Calumet

Eagle Harbor, Michigan

added a link pointing to Calumet

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:40, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 23:23, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Camp Lahti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no real evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 05:04, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Quis separabit? 19:59, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note --NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:20, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Seeberville Murders

The page is unprotected tomorrow (18 July). I recommend we discuss the article and anything objectionable. I am not going to engage in edit warring with you but will make reports as necessary. Given your refusal to comment at the report which was opened at

As I said, we need to discuss issues before you make any wholesale reverts. Also, you cannot just add reams of text which you have copied and pasted from other websites, as this CAN CREATE

WP:CLOSEPARAPHRASING). Yours, Quis separabit? 16:06, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Most of your reference links are broken and unformatted; nothing to do, by the way, in case you decide to start accusing me, with my editing (see diff of your last edit (see here). Also, view this (your last edit), which clearly shows the broken and non-existent redlinked reflinks. If you re-start an

ownership issues, in my opinion. Quis separabit? 18:38, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Camp Lahti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Lahti until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 04:41, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's

http://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/what-if-finland-had-been-prepared-for-the-winter-war.185434/

You added "Within the Spring of 1918, the Finnish Whites dispatched two expeditions, which later merged together to create one expedition. One of these two expeditions had about one-hundred men and was led by Dr. Thorsten Renvall, the brother of Senator Heikki Renvall, who was leading the Senate of Finland in Vaasa during theFinnish Civil War. The other expedition was financed by businessmen and was known as Lapin rakuunat (English: "the Dragoons of Lapland"). This group was also led by a doctor, Onni Laitinen"

Ref says In the spring of 1918, the Finns sent two expeditions, which later joined together. One of these two expeditions had a strength of about 100 men and was lead by Dr. Thorsten Renvall (brother of Senator Heikki Renvall, who was the leader of the Finnish Senate aka the Finnish Government in Vaasa during Civil War). The other expedition was financed by businessmen, and was known as Lapin Rakuunat (The Dragoons of Lapland) and was also lead by a doctor - Onni Laitinen.

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:01, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I was wondering if you would be interested in contributing articles to

Hello, The Copper Miner. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The paragraphs you restored to the Charles Moyer article are interesting, but don't even mention Charles Moyer. Without some reference to his personal involvement, they seem to me just a rambling off-topic digression which perhaps belongs in some other article. I assume you disagree, but if you consider that these statements belong in the Moyer article, please tie them better to Moyer. I see that you are from Hancock. I lived there for a couple of years a very long time ago. Thanks. Plazak (talk) 02:03, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thankyou for your participation in the challenge series or/and contests. In November The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There will be over $4000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. If this would appeal to you and you think you'd be interested in contributing new articles on women during this month for your region or wherever please sign up in the participants section. The articles done may also count towards the ongoing challenge. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate and raise money to buy books about women for others to use, this is also fine. Help would also be appreciated in drawing up the lists of missing articles. If you think of any missing articles please add them to the sub lists by continent at Missing articles. Thankyou, and if taking part, good luck!♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:33, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, The Copper Miner. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		The WikiProject Wisconsin Barnstar
		You have lit up my watch list for the past few days with terrific additions to Wisconsin articles. Thank you! Dolotta (talk) 06:35, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	Promotion of the place where people describe where they live by pointing to a spot on their hands award
	For all your great work promoting articles about my and your state.

P.S., it is possible to reasonably portray both

Lower Peninsula using both hands. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:20, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The Copper Miner (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 104.143.192.0/19. Hello, I am the holder of this account and I contribute to Wikipedia on a sporadic basis, I usually use varied sources including my books on hand, which are a bit overabundant but nonetheless useful, I hope. I came on to edit an article today about the Calumet Charter Township, however, I noticed I was banned and I don't quite understand why. If someone could get back to me on this, that'd be great; also how do I change my e-mail for this account? The Copper Miner (talk) 01:04, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That IP address belongs to Telentia and is a confirmed colocation service. Yamla (talk) 11:59, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You change your email address in your Preferences. The IP address you are using is within a range that is blocked as a webhost. If you have changed the physical location at which you access Wikipedia, that may be the issue. If you return to a location where you have successfully edited before, and clear the cookies in your browser, you may be able to resume editing. 331dot (talk) 02:20, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Clarence J. Monette has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, could barely find any sources, article has been an orphan for some time

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JooneBug37 (talk) 02:28, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]