User talk:Tipkorir

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. LAAFan 16:01, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Paul Kihara Waiganjo, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Kihara Waiganjo. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Citedcover (talk) 16:01, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To link to other articles on Wikipedia, simply do this: [[Kenya]] or [[Arsenal F.C.|Arsenal]]. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurice_Odhiambo Maurice Odhiambo] is only for external links. Also, please do not create any more articles on players who have not played in a fully professional league, as they do not meet our guidelines. Thanks, пﮟოьεԻ 57 11:12, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to know how to format an article properly, have a look at the changes I made here. Please ask if you have any questions. пﮟოьεԻ 57 11:22, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Patrick Osiako.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Jacob Mulee. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. GiantSnowman 11:34, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hello, Tipkorir. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tipkorir. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tipkorir. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tipkorir,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Girth Summit and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started,

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

GirthSummit _(blether) 15:59, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - just a personal note to follow up on the previous automated message. The article is about a living person, and our BLP policy is quite strict that those must have reliable sourcing - we can't host unsourced articles about living people. If you can't add some

reliable sources to it in the next week it will be deleted, although I'd be happy to turn it into a draft for you to work on until you can add sources if you'd prefer. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 16:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:23, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Nothing has been added to the page following the earlier declinature. The subject does not pass

WP:GNG

.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jimmy Bageya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
  db-self
  }}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
  may be deleted
  .
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 21:22, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tipkorir! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 21:22, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eric Ochieng, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2013 Kenyan Super Cup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Augustine Ochieng, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KCB (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:48, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wycliffe Otieno is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wycliffe Otieno until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. qedk (t 桜 c) 12:04, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Vincent Otieno has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:GNG

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 21:56, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ebrima Sanneh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ebrima Sanneh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BlameRuiner (talk) 05:36, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oliver Maloba and many other of your articles are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The articles will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oliver Maloba until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BlameRuiner (talk) 14:20, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tipkorir. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 19:46, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability

of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia requires in-depth coverage in multiple

WP:NCORP

. In addition please see

WP:PAID

(the latter page is mandatory) and make the necessary disclosures.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Tipkorir/Jonathan Jackson Foundation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Tipkorir/Jonathan Jackson Foundation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 12:27, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tipkorir. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 12:27, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tipkorir,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bensci54 (talk) 17:57, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whether the subject actually exists isn't relevant to whether or not it's promotional. Wikipedia is a

articles for creation

for you to get feedback again, and that you try to address any feedback before moving it to mainspace - if you don't then it's likely to get deleted again.

Also are you affiliated with this organisation in any way, or did they pay you to write a Wikipedia page about them? If so then you need to read the pages on

paid editing disclosure. Hut 8.5 08:46, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Bensci54

Thank you for taking the time to respond.

Much obliged that should you restore the draft I will take the direction you have pointed out; of sending it to

You seem to have lots of experience and I'd wish to learn a lot more from you.

I work for a sister company to the Jonathan Jackson Foundation and I was only helping out (for free) to create the page. I will read the pages you have pointed out to understand more. Tipkorir (talk) 10:30, 11 February 2022 (UTC)tipkorir[reply]

• OK, I've restored it to
  WP:AFC when you're done and if it's rejected please address the feedback. If it gets moved to mainspace in this state (or a similar state) it will likely just be deleted again. Hut 8.5 13:11, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Bensci54

I will rework it appropriately. Thank you for the second chance Tipkorir (talk) 17:23, 11 February 2022 (UTC)tipkorir[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here

.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• User:Tipkorir/Jonathan Jackson (Kenyan businessman) may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 09:15, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please please, point that out for me the copyrighted part and I will adjust it accordingly Tipkorir (talk) 15:38, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Tipkorir/Jonathan Jackson (Kenyan businessman). Thanks! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 09:15, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The Early Life, Career sections are still entirely unsourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jonathan Jackson (Kenyan businessman) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jonathan Jackson (Kenyan businessman), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 19:03, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Allow me to edit it further as I source for relevant references. I will re-submit it later on Tipkorir (talk) 19:57, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by

independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability

of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lordship Africa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lordship Africa, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CUPIDICAE💕 18:41, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments are well noted. I'll rework and try and seek other referencing sources then resubmit the page Tipkorir (talk) 11:09, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Justiyaya was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid

when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Source 4 is a non-independent source, source 3 seems more like a passing mention, source 2 may be a sponsored post per [1]. Would likely need 2-3 more independent, reliable sources that give significant coverage to the subject for a good claim on notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jonathan Jackson (Kenyan businessman) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jonathan Jackson (Kenyan businessman), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Justiyaya 13:04, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jonathan Jackson (Kenyan businessman). Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:13, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments noted. Considering all references have been flagged, I'll have to get the page deleted for now. As largely pointed out, I can't seem to find any other articles on him. Hopefully within the year there will be more credible ones that I can use. Tipkorir (talk) 05:50, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Masoud Juma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lome.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kevin Okumu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Okumu (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BlameRuiner (talk) 08:58, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jacob Osano has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet

WP:GNG

.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hitro talk 09:23, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seen your pointers on this new page. Will try re-work, then update it to meet the criteria Tipkorir (talk) 10:15, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have re-worked Jacob Osano's page and replaced some references. I'll appreciate if you can look at it one more time Tipkorir (talk) 08:43, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tipkorir

Thank you for creating Maurice Korir.

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:30, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Tipkorir (talk) 04:46, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Caroline Cherotich is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Cherotich until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Tipkorir, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Dial911, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Arap Marindich, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arap Marindich.

You might like to note that such

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dial911}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dial911 (talk) 22:07, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dial911: your comments are very well received, and I appreciate the notes. I understand the concern of whether the page is suitable for Wikipedia or not, but Arap Marindich has suddenly become a hit in news rooms due to his skits leading to several articles on him due to a new found notability. That informed the need to create his page. Let me see how best to re-work it to save it from an ultimate deletion. Tipkorir (talk) 06:10, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arap Marindich is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arap Marindich until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dial911 (talk) 22:11, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

This is well noted. I'll seek out more references and improve on it. Thank you for the pointers. Tipkorir (talk) 05:16, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tipkorir. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:34, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tipkorir, thank you for your contributions! I just wanted to give you a heads-up about the website ke.opera.news, since I saw that you used it as a source a few days ago. ke.opera.news looks like a good source on the surface, but together with ng.opera.news, gh.opera.news, za.opera.news, and ci.opera.news, it belongs to a family of news platforms where contributors can register and submit articles, but there is no actual fact checking or editorial oversight (they have a disclaimer saying "Any/all written content and images displayed are provided by the blogger/author, appear herein as submitted by the blogger/author and are unedited by Opera News.") This means that the site counts as a

This is well noted. Thank you. Tipkorir (talk) 15:03, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jimmy Kintu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Kintu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BlameRuiner (talk) 09:50, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is noted. Will look for ways to have it improved Tipkorir (talk) 14:28, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page has since been improved following the notes you issued Tipkorir (talk) 05:05, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gabriel Njoroge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriel Njoroge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BlameRuiner (talk) 09:56, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is well noted. I'll have the article improved to keep it up Tipkorir (talk) 14:29, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page has since been updated following your pointers Tipkorir (talk) 05:04, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gabriel Njoroge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coach.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tipkorir. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:28, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tim Bryett has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Football coach who fails GNG and SPORTSBASIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 06:27, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This message is well received. I'll have a relook at the page, and rework it accordingly to avoid a deletion Tipkorir (talk) 14:22, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please have a fresh look at the page following an update. I believe there is evidence that Tim Bryett is now notable Tipkorir (talk) 17:35, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tim Bryett, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Bryett until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please have a fresh look at the page following an update. I believe there is evidence that Tim Bryett is now notable Tipkorir (talk) 17:36, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gideon Ochieng is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gideon Ochieng until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BlameRuiner (talk) 08:42, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tim Bryett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coach.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdul-Samadu Musafiri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul-Samadu Musafiri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BlameRuiner (talk) 10:12, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, Tipkorir. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:22, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tipkorir. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:47, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

This is well noted. I'll have the article reworked then reposted Tipkorir (talk) 11:48, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

This is well noted. I'll seek more references then submit it for consideration once again. Thank you Tipkorir (talk) 06:02, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tipkorir! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 12:29, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 11:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Kindly guide me on how to do that Tipkorir (talk) 06:21, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tipkorir, the easiest way of doing this is to go to the Talk page of the article in question, and copy the Biography template - {{WikiProject Biography}} - into the top of the page. There is further information available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography, but just pasting in the template will get the article into the Wikiproject, where others can see it's been added and will help expand the article. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 10:43, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tipkorir. Thank you for your work on

Thanks for you work. Suggest merging this to become a section in the Jonathan Jackson Foundation article but I'm marking it as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:50, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tipkorir. Thank you for your work on

Thanks for you work. I marked as reviewed but IMO it would be better to merge this into the Foundation article. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:30, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]