User talk:Tomixdf

Hello Tomixdf, and Benjaminstewart05 15:54, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply ] Getting started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikipedians Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Conflict resolution Getting technical Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

That is a great article, keep up the good work. Have you seen the

Tomixpf hi. I cannot understand where you spotted vandalism. At the moment there is a superb covent garden ring circle running. I tried to add some comment on that. If you don t agree with them fine erase them. But would you be kind enough to add a reference according to your understanding for the performance in covent gardens? It is pitty not to be included. RegardsItaliotis 21:26, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, you were right, a quick search of sleepywood.net shows no mention of Kanti at all. BETA 13:05, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question: You mentioned on the talk page that you could tell the editor of the defamatory article was Leaveout by IP address. How can you track an IP address? Might be a silly question, but I don't know how to do it...and it would be helpful in situations like that. Thanks.--

It's simple: click on the IP number that is shown as the user name, and go to the WHOIS button at the bottom of the page (there are other options there as well). This will give you some idea where the IP number is located (often a school or university, or a specific local provider). You probably already knew this, anyway. Thanks for the good job on the Ali page, BTW! Cheers, Tomixdf (talk) 09:32, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks...I didn't even know about the WHOIS button. Have a good one!--

talk) 09:37, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

That WHOIS button really comes in handy...

talk) 11:15, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

(sniff, sniff) Smell

talk) 16:13, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi,

It's good to see that you are interested in ritonavir article. I hope that with our constructive collaboration the article will get better.

I beg to disagree with your opinion of the interactions section. You are right that wording was not particularly fortunate but the content is very much worth incorporating into the article.

1. drug interactions section is a legitimate information that no article on a medication can do without
2. the info is based on a verifiable, respectable source of scientific/medical information
3. drug interaction sections has already been added to hundreds of articles (with FA among them)

Please see and comment on my latest edits.

Best regards,
Kpjas (talk) 08:27, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, it's not my picture, I just noticed that it was being used on the

Thank you for uploading

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 17:44, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,

I am drafting a Requests for comment/User conduct concerning the conduct of Logicus (talk · contribs · count · api · block log) since the abortive RfC of February 2007. Since you have been involved in a past dispute at Talk: Bayesian probability, I would appreciate it if you would look over the draft and see whether it seems appropriate, what revisions you would propose, or what you could add.

At the moment, parts of the RfC are little more than outline points and the desired outcome is totally undefined, but with cooperation perhaps something can be put together that could make it through the process.

I had hoped that this RfC would not need to be posted, given the recent closure of a content RfC on Logicus's edits. However, Logicus's recent comments suggest that I may have been too optimistic.

Feel free to either edit the draft or submit comments on its talk page. --SteveMcCluskey (talk) 21:37, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A

Hi there. You might want to take a look at this. Thank you. Amsaim (talk) 13:53, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I replied to your note. Dilaudid (talk) 17:50, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking about trying to do something about this, But... I think trying to fight any battles on this is a waste of time. The article is a shambles, but it's only on a logic puzzle, who cares? Dilaudid (talk) 12:28, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I do think it matters. Such "paradoxes" are often abused to cast doubt on the Bayesian probability calculus. It's an outrage that such nonsense persists on Wikipedia. It's a spectacular example of how the Wikipedia model breaks down due to one abusive editor. Tomixdf (talk) 13:25, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I might stick around to try to put it right - so I've cut my more negative comments. It is a silly waste of time article, but it frustrates me that I cannot easily and simply spot the flaw in the argument. Dilaudid (talk) 19:05, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:3fonteinen.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:07, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!