User talk:Tube of Light

My logged out contributions are at Special:Contributions/45.251.33.0/24 from sometime in July 2020 till 19 or 20 July 2021 (I don't remember which date) (some edits were by other people on the same range, though about 85-95% are mine) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.251.33.192 (talk) 05:15, 28 October 2020 (UTC) Updated by Tube·of·Light 04:43, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tube of Light! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Pekka Lundmark, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Joseph2302 (talk) 09:41, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, I saw that you were edit warring on Genie (feral child). The term "mentally retarded" is outdated and considered to be offensive. Please read Retard (pejorative). And do not edit war. Thank you. Pack My Box (talk) 21:16, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Pack My Box:. Thanks for taking the time to discuss this with me. I do agree that the term is considered to be offensive but as per my understanding, WP:Presentism implies that the old term should be used if most of the reliable sources available use it. However, I am not in a position to take the time to discuss this, so I'll avoid that article and leave it for other editors to discuss. TubeOfLightTalk Less, Smile More 01:18, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, I would not change a direct quote but there is no need to retain offensive terms. That essay does not mean that we should not use modern terminology. Regardless, edit warring is not the way. Thank you for your reply. Pack My Box (talk) 02:42, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the section about the founder, Dawnn Karen recieving racial descrimination as I thought that was the reason the article was marked as being written from a non- neutral point of view. Could you help me understand what it is that doesnt sound neutral? I am not being compensated for writting this article at all so I want to make sure it doesnt appear that way. Thank You

Hi, SophiaEx. Sorry for reverting your edits. I just now chose to read the sources you removed and I found that they were not relevant enough to be included in the article. I assumed that your edits weren't productive because your explanation didn't seem to be true (since Wikipedia has had problems with other people removing negative information and they tend to use similar edit summaries). If you said that the information you removed wasn't relevant enough to the article, I would have understood what you wanted to do and wouldn't have reverted your edits. Tube·of·Light 15:53, 27 July 2021 (UTC) (PS - Next time, please remember to sign your talk page messages with four tildes (like this ~~~~) so that editors will know that you have written a message to them. Wikipedia's software will convert that into a link to your userpage, a link to your talk page and a timestamp. You can read Wikipedia:Signatures for more info)[reply]

PPS - You can now remove the info I re-added to the article. Tube·of·Light 15:54, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Did not notice it was you, I hope you are well and welcome back to Wikipedia. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 08:06, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tube of Light! The thread you created at the archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:03, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

Hi Tube of Light! The thread you created at the archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both talk) 19:01, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

Uh... wait a minute ! Why you reverted my edit ? I know my phone, and I saw the video quality, 720p at 30 frames, and for my phone's selfie camera's video, is set in 720p at 30 frames... my phone model : Nokia 3. ÉOLE79000 (talk) 20:34, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So, am I ready to revert your edit ? Best regards, ÉOLE79000 (talk) 20:35, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 13 February 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Rahul Bajaj, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 11:34, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for the editing of the Outfit7 article 😞 I only added what i heard was true. Bye, take care! OneSmartGuy22 (talk) 16:35, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When nomintating articles on secondary schools for deletion, it is best to use Newspapers.com.

Thank you for supporting the NPP initiative to improve WMF support of the Page Curation tools. Another way you can help is by voting in the Board of Trustees election. The next Board composition might be giving attention to software development. The election closes on 6 September at 23:59 UTC. View candidate statement videos and Vote Here. MB 04:11, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi this is surfmaster23 i would like to address the reason behind removing the picture from 2023 cricket world cup final. That image will be deleted after 7 days, so i urge you to please change the image with File:Cricket 6.jpg, for some reason i cant edit that page. Surfmaster23 (talk) 12:25, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I have replaced the image. If possible, can you tell me who is the batsman and the bowler in that specific image so that I can add it to the image caption? Tube·of·Light 12:49, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So Mitchell strac is bowling to Rohit Sharma who is on Strike and non striker is Shubman Gill. Surfmaster23 (talk) 14:59, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

I just asked a question and you reverted it. I just wanted to know when Season 6 of TT&F will come out. I don't understand and according to YOU my edits are vandalism, yet they aren't, so what did i do? TeratingaKevinBaughsNewFriend (talk) 15:11, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The talk page isn't meant to be used for asking about future seasons of TV shows, it is meant to be used to discuss only content issues and edits to the contents of the article. Using the talk page for a purpose it is not meant for constitutes vandalism and will result in such content being deleted. Tube·of·Light 15:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, but why did you revert all my edits? Some inform a lot, but mostly basically nothing. TeratingaKevinBaughsNewFriend (talk) 20:18, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You made only one edit which I reverted. Everything else you wrote hasn't been reverted. Tube·of·Light 02:32, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 10 June 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 Indian general election, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede66 09:44, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tube of Light! The thread you created at the Teahouse, How to deal with someone responding to a warning by swearing at me on my talk page?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both talk) 03:47, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply ]

Hello! Voting in the

2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

I was gonna make an argument, but then I released a redundancy of using that and "Animated sequels about talking animals", since "sequels" is not exclusive to just film franchises like "Kung Fu Panda".-Prince Silversaddle (talk) 18:55, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A new draft named Draft:Talking Tom Cat (2010 video game) has created yesterday, what do you think about this? 2001:D08:D5:DB3E:5CAB:510C:CEEF:C0EA (talk) 06:00, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any particular reason why you jumped to vand3 on User talk:74.84.109.150? The user only had a couple of edits, neither of which was clearly bad-faith vandalism. Did they vandalize from another account or IP address? Anerdw (talk) 19:46, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest I don't remember, it's been more than a month, I must have misclicked or something and then failed to notice what level the warning was. In hindsight I should have gone with a level 2 warning instead. I'll be more careful next time. Tube·of·Light 03:29, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tube of Light! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Help recovering old deleted version of article and talk page (and also accidentally sent a CSD notice to an admin, I don't know what went wrong), has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both talk) 03:28, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply ]

"Play Store links showing an app was created by the studio are not spam by any reasonable definition"--a commercial link where one can buy something, in this case an app, is the very definition of a spam link. Drmies (talk) 12:11, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tube of Light! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Is it wrong to list apps relevant to a media franchise on two separate articles (the app developer article and the franchise article)? And are Google Play Store links to prove an app belongs to a developer "commercial spam" because they allow Wikipedia readers to directly go and download them?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both talk) 03:59, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply ]