User talk:Ugajin
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
|
68.39.174.238 (talk) 17:45, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies
Hi. I would like to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change. If interested, please get in touch via my talkpage or email me Encyclopaedia21 (talk) 19:23, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Aunt Jane's Nieces in Society
I have nominated Aunt Jane's Nieces in Society, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aunt Jane's Nieces in Society. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. 龗 (talk) 12:23, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Thomas Lunsford
Puritan efforts at propaganda and psychological warfare took advantage of Lunsford's reputation as a wild cavalier who could perpetrate almost any outrage; John Lilburne spread rumors of Lunsford's cannibalism. A folk rhyme of the era, which confused Thomas with his brother Henry, held that
- The post who came from Coventry,
- Riding in a red rocket,
- Did tidings tell how Lunsford fell,
- A child's hand in his pocket.(John Lacy, The Dramatic Works of John Lacy, edited by James Maidment and W. H. Logan, Edinburgh, William Paterson, 1875; p. 123.)
You added the above text to
Shakespeare
Thanks! I was expecting it would take months to have someone explain that table!
The article D. Scott Rogo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable reliable sources.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
Unreferenced BLPs
- Blake Chen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:50, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 20:17, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
John Florio
Hi, I am researching Samuel Daniel and I notice that you added this line to his biog. "Their sister Rosa was Edmund Spenser's model for Rosalind in his The Shepherd's Calendar;" I really need to know what your source is for this quote, as I have found elsewhere that she is called Aline Daniel and it is important for my research to know if she actually called Rosaline Daniel, the muse of Edmund Spenser and Shakespeare!
I really hope you can help and thanks for your work on wikipedia.
--Billdup (talk) 23:24, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Some stroopwafels for you!
well done, you have been quoted by the New York Times (and not credited) [1] - [2] hope you are doing well. Duckduckstop (talk) 19:57, 29 July 2014 (UTC) |
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Nomination of Neolithic Subpluvial for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neolithic Subpluvial until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:50, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Forest of Burzee
The article
Element does not have significant coverage in reliable third party sources as mandated by the
WP:GNG. A search shows primary sources and passing mentions, nothing to establish WP:Notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jontesta (talk) 16:52, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Forest of Burzee for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forest of Burzee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Jontesta (talk) 00:25, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
John Sumner (actor, died 1649)
The article
Unable to find evidence he was a notable stage actor or meets general notability guidelines here
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the