I have noticed that you revert quite a bit of vandalism. Since you have demonstrated that you have a good grasp of what constitutes
rollback
on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing
Twinkle
.
Rollback can be used to revert vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback may be removed at any time.
If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view
this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! J.delanoygabsadds05:39, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
You should have had it long ago. I saw you revert vandalism on 3 or 4 pages on my watchlist, looked at your contribs, and was like "Whoa". Have fun, and keep up the good work! J.delanoygabsadds05:58, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
on the Kama Sutra should we ban him or give him 2 more chances? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yowiki (talk • contribs) 05:00, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Thnx Ulric i gave him 2, but he did it 4 times. SO what? u know who im talking about right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yowiki (talk • contribs) 05:26, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Promethean has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
{{subst:if|||
{{{message}}}
||subst=subst:}}
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
If you think my edit did not improve the article, that's fine and I'm happy to discuss. Drive-by reversions without any explanation about the actual merits of the change just strikes me as quite rude and counterproductive. The guidelines
WP:BOLD explicitly encourage bold improvement of an article, so simply saying the changes are too big, without actual comment on the substance of the change doesn't fly. Thanks. As to my changes, they were actually not big, and I did explain them in the edit summaries they were (1) leave the definition at an actual quote rather than the quote plus a pov paraphrase (2) integrate a one-line section into the main text (3) add another example of a spin-off (4) remove one quite pov statement (at the end of palin) that was in no way necessary to the point. Which of those do you have a problem with? Thanks. 130.56.65.24 (talk) 04:28, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
]
Thanks for the explanation, and the self-revert. Must have checked in during the wrong few second. Had been a bit put-off by the previous revert, so was not as courteous as I should have been. 130.56.65.24 (talk) 04:34, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am impressed that you are still actively working on New Year Eve :D. I were gonna revert the vandalism from the French_Third_Republic article but you were faster than me. Thank you a lot for keeping wikipedia clean and free. And Happy New Year :). Mgz (talk) 08:12, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Ulric1313...., i've just accidentally visited the history of my user page, thanks for reverting that vendalism.
nomi887 (talk) 10:14, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Talk:Strikeforce and maybe chip in so we get closer to a consensus for the latest issue? There have been quite a few issues about ignoring sources from mma websites and restructuring the page. Thanks, Sea888 (talk) 00:33, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply
]
2008 Election
Hey. I need a third party opinion on the article regarding the
Thank you for fixing the link on Miami Hurricanes football. I found the article as of the start of the month to be very POV and filled with peacock words and copyvio's. I have been trying to clean it up. The article needs a fresh pair of eyes to read it from a non-UM perspective. Could you please review it and weigh in with possible changes? Thanks. Racepacket (talk) 12:02, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks
The Working Man's Barnstar
For your efforts in fixing the disambiguation links on the 108
Sorry for adding the template for speedy deletion, I created "Template:Dolphins2010DraftPicks" and subsequently "Template:Miami Dolphins Draft template list" without noticing you created that template first. I should have move it to "Template:Dolphins2010DraftPicks" to keep a standard within those templates instead of deleting it, I apologize for that but I hope you keep helping in improving that templates, especially the new feature I added with the draft years at the bottom of the templates. Cheers, --Octa62 (talk) 20:58, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Reviewer rights
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not
autoconfirmed
to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious
Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here
.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
I want to thank you for your friendly dab just now, at Medical cannabis. I'm grateful for all your WikiGnomish work; it's you and your kindred that keep this wonderful place from collapsing under its own weight and keep the rest of us safe from the great unwashed who vandalize it. I really, really mean this. So please exclude my dairy products from any nightly rounds that might have become necessary, okay? Thanks again! – OhioStandard (talk)07:38, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I recently came across one of your edits, and I saw the letters 'dab' in the edit summary.
then I clicked on your user's contributions and realized all of them say 'dab'. what is that mean?
does 'dab' really apply to all your edit summaries?
I'm just curious. Likeminas (talk) 00:54, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for helping with Brighstone Shop. Are you interested in the Isle of Wight? If so feel free to join WikiProject Wight (sorry cant get link to work !). Mant thanks again Xhavnak (talk) 20:52, 16 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]
We are a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Rihanna and her discography. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Participants Page!
Thank You.
Hello I am shortly proposing that recent moves of rivers in Australia be moved back, hundreds of links left dangling. Your good efforts may be in vain, so would suggest you hold off on these for a bit. Regards (Crusoe8181 (talk) 05:33, 26 September 2011 (UTC)).[reply]
Hello, Ulric1313. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{
ygm
}} template.
Many more thanks
Well done for spotting my misuse of Longchamp. As a blinkered horse racing fan, it never occurred to me that it was anything other than a racecourse. I will take more in future, but I am always thankful for the help. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 17:32, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Charles Egerton (British Army officer) on this article; the birth/death dates suggest that it's the wrong Charles Egerton so I've reverted for now. There seem to be an unusual number of people by this name, I've tried picking them apart myself before now only to give up in exasperation :( - TB (talk) 18:03, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply
I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the
WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412T02:09, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply
Greetings fellow disambiguator! Remember back in February when we made history by clearing the board for the first time ever, for the monthly disambiguation contest? Let's do it again in May! I personally will be aiming to lead the board next month, but for anyone who thinks they can put in a better effort, I will give a $10 Amazon gift card to any editor who scores more disambiguation points in May. Also, I will be setting up a one-day contest later in the month, and will try to set up more prizes and other ways to make this a fun and productive month. Cheers! bd2412T18:51, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you
Hi Ulric1313: In this 75th year of the congressional founding of the US Coast Guard Auxiliary, I am trying to thank every editor who has had a hand in crafting the Wikipedia article about founder Malcolm Stuart Boylan. Thank you very much for your efforts through the years! May you have fair winds and following seas all your days. Taram (talk) 22:08, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for catching the extra links to the disambiguation page Thozha that I somehow totally missed when I was fixing the links - much appreciated! -- Natalya15:29, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Reference errors on 6 April
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Thanx for linking Ron Nelson on eight drum corps pages. I checked for other corps that have played his music by referencing www.corpsreps.com and found one that was correctly linked and five that were only linked to Ron Nelson and disambiguated them. GWFrog (talk) 03:14, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As one of Wikipedia's most experienced Wikipedia editors,
Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere(or here)01:38, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Ulric1313. Voting in the
2017 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but all of you recent edits have edit summaries that appear to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Tornado chaser (talk) 17:27, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I recently sent you an invitation to join NPP, but you also might be the right candidate for another related project, AfC, which is also extremely backlogged. Would you please consider becoming an Articles for Creation reviewer? Articles for Creation reviewers help new users learn the ropes of creating their first articles, and identify whether topics are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Reviewing drafts doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia inclusion policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After requesting to be added to the project, reviewing is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the reviewing instructions before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere(or here)03:14, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Too many thank you's to do -- but thanks for cleaning up my recent album/book ref additions. Much appreciated -- clearly I am doing something wrong! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Muso805 (talk • contribs) 21:48, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]