User talk:ValtteriLahti12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rauma dialect, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Finnish and Rauma.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created,

The nature of my issues with the article does not revolve solely around that specific source; the source is simply a good example of one specific issue within my overall nomination. Also, I've got a copy of the book, and on page 7 (as you've cited in your recent edit) does not assert that Northumbrians are "distinct from other English people"; in fact the only mention of any form of 'distinctiveness' is in relation to accent (and other things related to linguistics) rather than a separate ethnogenesis and/or cultural distinctiveness making them separate from all other English people. It may be better to continue this discussion on the article's talk page. Alssa1 (talk) 12:14, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For now i deleted that part of the article, however regional identities should still have articles, it would be more use to improve the article instead of deletion. --ValtteriLahti12 (talk) 12:17, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think i accidentaly referenfed the wrong page, it said "Vii" instead of 7. --ValtteriLahti12 (talk) 12:18, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you're relying on "Vii" to support the claim "Northumbrians are culturally distinct from other English people", you're engaging in

WP:SYNTH. The source does not make that claim. To quote directly: "Using the more inclusive term 'Northumbrians' avoids bogging us down in the imprecise demarcation of Geordies and Mackems, the two feuding tribes of Tyne and Wear whose modern rivalry has obscured how much they share in common..." Basically an inclusive neologism has been created for the purposes of this book so as to recant the history of the people of the region. Alssa1 (talk) 12:34, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Well that part can be deleted from the article, however it is still better to try to improve the article rather than delete it. --ValtteriLahti12 (talk) 12:39, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We don't create articles for the sake of it, they have to have an encyclopedic value. We haven't got a Yorkshireman article, or West Countryman article, or a 'Gwyneddian' article etc etc. Why does 'Northumbrian' specifically require its own article on wikipedia when the others don't? Alssa1 (talk) 21:17, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Who said other regional identities don't need an article?, even my tribe Finns proper have an article. There is even a whole template for all Finnish subgroups, if Finnish subgroups have articles, why not English? --ValtteriLahti12 (talk) 06:08, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here are more examples of subgroup articles: Pomors Gauja Estonians Ludza Estonians --ValtteriLahti12 (talk) 06:20, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Terve,
saatat olla kiinnostunut näistä vastikään julkaistuista kokoavista digisanakirjoista:

• Kamassz szótár
• Kojbál szótár

--Trɔpʏliʊm • blah 06:06, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kiitos, tiedänkin unkarilaisen joka on kiinnostunut tästä ja lähetin myös hänelle ValtteriLahti12 (talk)

Lännen lokari, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:50, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ValtteriLahti12! Hope you're doing good. Just one observation/question: I agree with you about this[1] (we don't have to mention everything that someone has stated somewhere at some time), but: doesn't by the same logic the page Sino-Uralic give undue weight to a fringe hypothesis of a single author (with one co-author in one paper) by having a standalone page for it? –Austronesier (talk) 15:02, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fringish language theories as far as I have seen often have wiki pages, however its acceptance can be changed to ”fringe”. I myself don’t believe Sino-Uralic at all, I also edited the Uralic page to include Sino-Uralic in the "fringe" section. ValtteriLahti12 (talk)

Don't worry, I am sure that you don't buy into it. Actually, WP has an inclusion policy about fringe

Well there are other people who also proposed similar stuff, (https://www.britannica.com/topic/Uralic-languages) "The most radical of these claims is the massive Dené-Finnish grouping of Morris Swadesh, which encompasses, among others, Sino-Tibetan (e.g., Chinese) and Athabaskan (e.g., Navajo).", so I think it is covered enough to have an article. --ValtteriLahti12 (talk) 15:44, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ValtteriLahti12, thank you for your contributions. I think Sino-Uralic is "just about" worth mentioning in a standalone article, but it's certainly not well-known. The really non-notable fringe theories and hoaxes that I've been dealing with are pseudo-religious nonsense such as [2] [3], whereas Sino-Uralic is at least something slightly plausible coming from academia, resembling works by the Moscow School of Comparative Linguistics. — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 17:32, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm the German Kaiserreich and thank you for making the Paleo-Laplandic language page. It was very helpful for me for my research about substrate words. Did you know that the obsolete English word "cote" meaning cottage is speculated to be a borrowing from a Uralic language. Anyways, I've been thinking of a page called the Funnelbeaker language which is a hypothesized language or set of languages spoken by the Funnelbeaker Culture that was the source of presumably most of the Germanic substrate words like knight, reed and pflegen (the last one is German). What do you think about that? Deutschland1871 (talk) 02:48, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have heard about that proposed Uralic etymology, and if you have good sources go ahead with the page --ValtteriLahti12 (talk) 08:33, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So, the Sources are from mainly Wikitionary and Wikipedia so the information is kind of being reused. But I have a few problems, first I have no idea how to cite sources which is a big one since when you are editing or adding information, you need to cite them which is important. Secondly, the Funnelbeaker language is unclassified meaning that there is no way of relating it to any existing language family. However, I've came up with a few theories. First, O speculate that it might be an Afroasiatic language from a previously unknown branch from which I called the "Early European Farmer branch" after finding that Proto-Germanic *gaits is from a substrate but it might have some relatives I some Semitic languages which are Afroasiatic and look similar typologically. Then I found out that Proto-Germanic *skēpą looks like the Hebrew word for sheep when transliterated "kéves" and it only strengthened as the Proto-Indo-European word for sheep had a speculated relation with the same Hebrew word. However, then I contradicted my theory that the Funnelbeaker language is not from an unknown branch of Afroasiatic and possibly from a dead language family after realizing that I had little to no evidence after realizing that I've drawn up my previous conclusion with only two reconstructed words. Then, I recontradicted my theory after finding that the Proto-Germanic word for wren *wrandijo looked like the Arabic word for wren when transliterated "was". Then, I rerecontradicted my theory that it might be related to the Sumerian language under the idea that they must have seemed from a Proto-language and finding that the English word "ass" referring to a type of horse comes from Proto-Germanic which us from a substrate that looks like the Sumerian word for ass when transliterated "anšu". But for now, the Funnelbeaker language has to be classified as unclassified because we don't have enough proof yet. Deutschland1871 (talk) 05:15, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Help:Referencing for beginners
• Wikipedia:Citing sources --ValtteriLahti12 (talk) 05:54, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks. It may take me some time but I'll get it eventually. Deutschland1871 (talk) 07:16, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Wouldn't some of the redirects here [4] need repointing to

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Proto-Protestantism, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proto-Protestantism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ValtteriLahti12! Thank you for your edits to Yeniseian languages. It looks like you've copied or moved text from Botai culture into that page, and while you are welcome to re-use the content, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. If you've copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thanks! DanCherek (talk) 18:49, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		The Christianity Barnstar
		Dear ValtteriLahti12, I award you The Christianity Barnstar for all your hard work in WikiProject Christianity-related articles, especially your recent additions to the article on the perpetual virginity of Mary. Keep up the good work! Your efforts are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 16:47, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have added asterisks to all of the proto-forms in the tables in Uralo-Siberian languages, since I'm assuming that they are all proto-language reconstructions. Can you confirm that they are all proto-languages and not attestations of synchronic languages? — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 14:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, they are proto-languages ValtteriLahti12 (talk) 14:39, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sino-Uralic languages has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:GNG

. The hypothesis is based on the work of one author, Jingyi Gao (with an exceptional instance of a co-author). None of the journal articles cited here has any citations on Google Scholar except for self-citations by the author Jingyi Gao.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Austronesier (talk) 21:14, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have doubts about the article's notability myself, so go ahead. --ValtteriLahti12 (talk) 05:51, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Predestinatian is not an English word. Editor2020 (talk) 02:50, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I made a typo ValtteriLahti12 (talk) 04:26, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to tell you to respect the sources and be more careful when editing.

Saying that Tertullian believed that "in an emergency, the laity can give the sacraments" is not the same as saying that Tertullian believed that "in an emergency, the laity can give the baptism".

By saying all the sacraments, it is a very serious error since you are saying that Tertullian believed that a layman can ordain priests, consecrate the Eucharist, administer the sacrament of Marriage and Confirmation, forgive sins in the sacrament of Reconciliation, etc...

The source only says that in an emergency a lay person can administer baptism, not all the sacraments. Please be more careful what you put in your edits.--Rafaelosornio (talk) 15:56, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rafaelosornio: Most edits you seemed to delete were me trying to change the wording of the sources so that I do not copy directly, thus breaking copyright. --ValtteriLahti12 (talk) 16:42, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kiinostaisko tuo Karjalan wikipedia homma? Kilaseell - Message me! - 14:26, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Livvinkarjalan wikipedia taitaa olla ainoa wikipedia millään suomen sukukielellä jos viroa ei lasketa. en ole ihan varma. -Kilaseell - Message me! - 14:27, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ValtteriLahti12,

Thank you for creating Protestant opposition to papal supremacy.

Alpha and Omega Ministries is a blog, the Gospel Coalition is a blog; this adds up to six references that are not reliable sources.

This article needs to satisfy general notability as given in

WP:GNG

More sources are needed. Individual sources must be evaluated separately and independently of each other and meet the four criteria below to determine if a source qualifies towards establishing notability:

1. Contain
   significant coverage
   addressing the subject of the article directly and in depth.
2. Be completely
   independent
   of the article subject.
3. Meet the standard for being a
   reliable
   source.
4. Be a
   secondary source
   ; primary and tertiary sources do not count towards establishing notability.
   

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 09:48, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha and Omega is the blog of a theologian who is an expert called James White, it is not unreliable as blogs ran by professionals are accepted ValtteriLahti12 (talk) 11:43, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please, before editing an article, make sure that what you write comes from the source you place. It is wrong to refer to a book in which what you write does not appear. --Rafaelosornio (talk) 15:38, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to delete stuff when I changed the wording, for example for "heretical" I used the word "heterodox", still keeping the general meaning. --ValtteriLahti12 (talk) 15:50, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ValtteriLahti12

Thank you for creating Piispanristi.

Good start. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 11:44, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ValtteriLahti12

Thank you for removing the redirect and working on the Origenism article.

Hi, I have reviewed Origenism. Thank you for your contributions here! I wanted to point you to

MOS:LEADCITE

regarding the many citations in the lead. I think they are not needed there because they are cited in the body. But I appreciate you, I just thought perhaps one small improvement. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 16:03, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @ValtteriLahti12: I reviewed this article and don't have a clue who the Hussites are. You have to tell the reader what is going in. I have no idea what thats about. Can you update the lede to give a description please. Great referencing. scope_creep^Talk 06:08, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ValtteriLahti12,

Thank you for creating Gavin Ortlund.

It is not clear how the subject of this article is notable, based on Wikipedia’s criteria. You will want to correct this or it could be considered for deletion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Caorongjin}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

—Caorongjin 💬 19:03, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Strigolniki into Protestantism in Russia. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 11:40, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

most of what I copied was written by me. --ValtteriLahti12 (talk) 12:14, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Now you see what I talked about here[5]. My appreciation was heartfelt then and even more, now. Austronesier (talk) 16:36, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

The quotes you sent me on discord pertaining to St. Ephrem the Syrian seeming to promote iconoclasm has substantial evidence to believe it is a forgery. - Bob Rightdivider1611 (talk) 22:41, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you are latinlearner13, I already blocked you multiple times and you still try to message me here, I am not interested in debating.--ValtteriLahti12 (talk) 09:41, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ValtteriLahti12. Thank you for your work on

Thanks for creating this article! Hopefully you will write more articles! Have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:42, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ValtteriLahti12. I came across your page while skimming the history page of Proto-Yeniseian, where you wrote that there was scarcely any material. Perhaps with the sources I added to the Further reading are able to improve it. KHR FolkMyth (talk) 12:49, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote it a long time ago and barely have any memory of what the sources say. --ValtteriLahti12 (talk) 13:14, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I invite you to review all the edits you have made to the articles, as they are full of repetitive information that you could easily replace using the pronouns. Only in this way will the quality of the articles improve, since a bad edition can ruin them. Rafaelosornio (talk) 04:38, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ValtteriLahti12. Thank you for your work on

Hey y'all! I sure hope y'all are havin' a mighty fine day today. I just wanted to say a heartfelt thank you for takin' the time to contribute to Wikipedia by creatin' that there article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Now y'all can rest easy and enjoy the rest of your day, along with your kinfolk! Y'all take care now, ya hear?

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:48, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bana'im is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bana'im until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maghāriya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maghāriya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hello, ValtteriLahti12,

I thought I'd let you know that this draft was just deleted through speedy deletion, CSD G13. I postponed deletion of this draft several times but you never returned to work on it so I let it be deleted on schedule as an expired draft. If you would like to continue to work on it, you can make a request at

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

Just adding a note to this rather than starting a new section, since it's related to this article. Thanks for your contributions on expanding the article. However, I would caution you to try to seek out reliable secondary sources as much as possible. Some of what was added relies on primary sources (sermon links and others) and (somewhat) editorial synthesis to arrive at the stated conclusion. It's better to have a secondary source do that. Also, use caution on labels. While ADL is a reliable source, labels of antisemitism need to use attribution (see

WP:RSPADL). Not saying the label isn't correct - it's how it's stated in the article. ButlerBlog (talk) 16:04, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

This group doesn't have many of their peculiar doctrinal stances very public, and most news focus on their more political takes, so their theological views are mostly kept within their sermons. I tried to add quotes to make it more accurate and to avoid too much paraphrase. --ValtteriLahti12 (talk) 16:29, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's generally better - it allows the reader to decide. Good efforts on expanding the article. ButlerBlog (talk) 17:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ValtteriLahti12. Thank you for your work on

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:09, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]