User talk:Vensatry/Archive 23

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Archive 20 Archive 21 Archive 22 Archive 23 Archive 24 Archive 25 → Archive 30

Bhadrakali (film)

Hey bro! I found an article where Viswanatha Rai claims that almost 50 per cent of the film, including two songs and the climax, was picturised with the help of the duplicate. You might consider rephrasing the hook. here --

Sriram speak up
23:56, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

We need more sources to make exact claims like this. The present hook looks convincing to me. And thanks for the source. —Vensatry (Ping) 05:36, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
It's your call. Suit yourself. --
Sriram speak up
12:01, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Right. You shouldn't be insisting for a change then! —Vensatry (Ping) 12:11, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
When did I? FYI, I had used the word might. You can always do what feels right for you. --
Sriram speak up
12:41, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Had it been bolded earlier, I might have very well noticed it. Sorry for that! And of course yes, I do what feels right for me. I don't welcome suggestions that makes no sense. —Vensatry (Ping) 13:22, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
I don't know if you know Hindi, but still, I just wanna say this: Jo Bhi Main Kehna Chahoon Barbaad Kare Alfaaz Mere. --
Sriram speak up
14:35, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
You're not supposed to communicate in any language other than English. And, I don't know Hindi. —Vensatry (Ping) 14:57, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Not supposed? I don't buy that. FYI, Soham communicates with some editors in Bengali (I think). Anyway, just see this. --
Sriram speak up
15:02, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Buy what? I think
WP:OSE applies here too! I don't really have a need to find out the meaning. —Vensatry (Ping)
15:08, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Well then.. Forgive me. I apologize for the inconvenience. Thanks. --

Sriram speak up
15:14, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

You need not apologize as I don't believe in "forgiveness" —Vensatry (Ping) 15:18, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Rajinikanth filmography FL

Recently,

User:Krimuk90 successfully brought Aamir Khan filmography to featured list status, despite having opened it only a short time ago. I therefore believe that Rajinikanth filmography has an equal chance of quick success. How about working on it after the release of Kochadaiiyaan? It may also become Kollywood's first article with featured status. Kailash29792 (talk
) 04:54, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Nominations getting promoted in quick time is in nobody's hands. It's a matter of reviewers that they attract and the nominator's promptness in resolving the issues! Coming to Rajini, I would not say that it's impossible but definitely needs some work. To my knowledge, he has not acted in any documentaries/shorts/TV shows like most of his contemporaries. However, finding the release dates of his old films would be tough. It's good to go for a peer review before FLC. —Vensatry (Ping) 08:36, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Bhadrakali (film)

Happy Easter and have a good Sunday Victuallers (talk) 16:03, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks and wishing you the same :) —Vensatry (Ping) 08:38, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 April 2014

S. V. Sahasranamam

I think you would be interested to create an article on him, and I found some sources as follows:

And I think you can find more sources in Tamil. Happy editing :) ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 16:18, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for everything. And, yes he needs an article, but right now, I'm concentrating only on the film. —Vensatry (Ping) 16:30, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
I guess you mean the film he was kicked out of :) Kailash29792 (talk) 16:48, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
Kailash, I'm getting lost cause of edit conflicts with you. I may have to edit the article at a later time. —Vensatry (Ping) 17:06, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Devika Rani

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dwaipayanc -- Dwaipayanc (talk
) 22:00, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

World War II fiction

At first, I noticed that Andha Naal belonged to the category "World War II fiction". I later discovered the category "World War II films", which has a description reading "These are films set in World War II, including those based on fact and fiction." That is why I shifted Andha Naal's category, also because "World War II fiction" seemed like a parent category. Please tell me if that was fair, because the edit was undone. Kailash29792 (talk) 18:59, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

You're right! Thanks for notifying :) —Vensatry (ping) 19:09, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2014

Your GA nomination of Devika Rani

The article Devika Rani you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Devika Rani for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dwaipayanc -- Dwaipayanc (talk) 03:01, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For making Devika Rani a GA! Kailash29792 (talk) 03:05, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your continued support and encouragement. —Vensatry (ping) 06:12, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Devika Rani

Wha?
01:56, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Specifically, the QPQ was started but isn't resolved yet.
Wha?
01:56, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 May 2014

DYK for Devika Rani

Cas Liber (talk · contribs

) 09:38, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Captured screenshot —Vensatry (ping) 10:23, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

National Film Award for Best Music Direction

Is that piece of information any relevant to this article? Almost every year, when the national awards is announced, you can see media reports that some particular person was a close contender for the award or that someone lost the award narrowly and so on. I did not question the reliability of the source you used but I think the information is quite irrelevant and trivial as regards this article. If you list all such occasions, the persons who lost the award by a vote or so will be much larger than the awardees themselves. Malayala Sahityam (talk) 17:45, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

First of all we shouldn't call it a
trivia as it was quoted in many sources including ARR's authorized biography. Secondly, it was not that IR had lost by one vote, but he was initially tied with ARR. And, it was only because of the chairman the award went to him. I cannot find newspapers quoting claims like this most often. And above all, it's very much relevant to the article as it talks about two of the most-time winners. —Vensatry (ping)
18:09, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of National Film Award for Best Music Direction

Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk
) 07:39, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Vensatry. You have new messages at Strike Eagle's talk page.
Message added 14:35, 11 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ƬheStrikeΣagle sorties 14:35, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Andha Naal

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article

criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk
) 09:21, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Andha Naal

The article Andha Naal you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Andha Naal for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld (talk) 17:21, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

What next?

Congratulations on getting Andha Naal to GA status. Now there are 7 good articles on Tamil films before 2000 AD. So what next? I know

Nayakan looks like a very good one, and I have some sources you could use. Kailash29792 (talk
) 04:26, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! I'm concentrating only on "best" films not year-wise ones. And, yes Nayakan is a good one and has a lot of potential. —Vensatry (ping) 14:03, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 May 2014

DYK for National Film Award for Best Music Direction

v/r - TP 18:41, 19 May 2014 (UTC) 18:48, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 May 2014

The Signpost: 28 May 2014

FLC review request

Hi. Hope you're well. I was wondering if you had the time to take a look at a FLC (Link to comments), (Link to article) that Corvoe and I put up a month ago. I know that you mainly do sports related lists but I would very much welcome your feedback. Cowlibob (talk) 16:45, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

I'll probably have a look at it tomorrow. —Vensatry (ping) 18:22, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Hey. Sorry if I caused any confusion with my edit. We have made the relevant changes to the article and given an explanation for the ones that weren't done. I was wondering if you had anything more to add to help us improve the FLC. Cowlibob (talk) 14:38, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Andha Naal

@
Baffle gab1978: Sorry for teh delay in getting back. Thanks for copy-editing the article. —Vensatry (ping)
 16:15, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 June 2014

Talkback

Hello, Vensatry. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (stations).
Message added 02:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You may have your say, if interested. Am posting this since you are the creator of

Tiruchirappalli Junction. βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ)(Support
) 02:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 June 2014

Population

Please see this stats [1].--Vin09 (talk) 06:16, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

I'm very well aware of that. Please go through the foot notes at the bottom of the page. —Vensatry (ping) 06:18, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Also, you shouldn't use rollback for reverting edits like this. It should only be used for reverting blatant vandalism, else the rights might be revoked. See
WP:RBK —Vensatry (ping)
06:23, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
ok sorry for that I will not use that. But let's discuss about population, census states around 8 lakh. Also, the agglomeration was in 2010, so the population came out in 2011. Those you mentioned may be in agglomerated population. If I am wrong please state a link which states 9 lakh population.
There are many reliable sources in the article itself. FYI, the figure is also present in the lead, and if you go through the demographics section, it would be very clear. —Vensatry (ping) 06:32, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
ok, but tell me the link or the reliable source where exactly the figures are this link [2], [3] and [4] stated as footnotes have only info about 2001 and no info on population of 2011.--Vin09 (talk) 06:34, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

also the demographics section state the one told be me.

FN (a) clearly explains about the expansion and the adjusted figures. The 916,674 figure is mentioned in the "Sanitary works in 18 Tiruchi wards to be outsourced" article (just click the next image). —Vensatry (ping) 06:39, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
but that was the news of 2013, you are stating the year in trichy page as 2011. Change the year to 2013 else the population to previous, if I am wrong.--Vin09 (talk) 06:44, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
No, the figures being published in 2013 doesn't necessarily mean that they are "as of 2013". They were calculated based on the 2011 final results; the municipal corporation gives out the data based on census reports only. I've done extensive research on this (it's a hobby too), besides a lot of cross-checking. —Vensatry (ping) 06:49, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
I do respect your opinion because populations do change when corporations gets merged, but we need to provide actual reference of the figure like the one I provided which are official on census 2011. It's ok let's close this here. Thank you.--Vin09 (talk) 06:52, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Vin09, that's what I'm exactly saying. There are sources for every single figure in the article. I've pointed everything, you just need to check them out. —Vensatry (ping) 06:55, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Official figures get obsolete over time. They update the records once in ten years. We cannot rely on them for demographic data at least. Take the case of Bangalore (city proper), which had a population of 4.292 million in 2001 (as per official records). The BBMP formed in 2007, resulted in a massive expansion and it clearly went past other cities like Chennai and Kolkata. So in 2014, you definitely cannot say "Bangalore is the fifth/sixth largest city in India". —Vensatry (ping) 06:59, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Venastry, what is your source, can you provide link? OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 07:01, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

For which figure? —Vensatry (ping) 07:08, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Population stats. If you are using anything other than the official consensus then it is not going to be widely accepted. Reason is simple that you have to follow the official number. You can mention the specific year of the consensus, but you have to use it. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 07:17, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
We've had many discussions in the past. All reliable sources that I've used are based on the official figures only. Besides, I've mentioned the official figures, change in city limits, corresponding change in population. I see no harm in using updated figures. —Vensatry (ping) 07:19, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
There was a discussion regarding this in the FAC. The figures that I'v used here are widely accepted and only then the article got promoted. See I cannot discuss trivial things like this every time. —Vensatry (ping) 07:22, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Link the discussion. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 07:23, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
It's at the talk page of the article. —Vensatry (ping) 07:25, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
No it is not. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 07:28, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
It's there in the FAC discussion. —Vensatry (ping) 07:30, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
I read the whole, you should've mentioned the archive2. I think we have already stated the Indian consensus on the first line of section, "demographics", I wouldn't have any issue with the current situation of the article. Anything else should be discussed on the talk page first. Consider me as non-involved editor. Happy editing. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 07:40, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
Yeah, by FAC I was referring to the successful one. And, thanks for understanding. —Vensatry (ping) 07:42, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

@Vin09: Wasn't the first warning on when to use rollback clear enough for you? You have abused it again today. — LeoFrank  Talk 13:49, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

ok, I will not use it again in wrong way, I read the rules once again.--Vin09 (talk) 13:55, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
@
Abhishek191288: you're back? Didn't notice your username change. —Vensatry (ping)
 17:48, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

What is your problem?

Why buddy? I mean First you mild oppose and when i clear all your concerns. Then, you left a note to criticize me? Hello! Who will strike your oppose? If your comments were not neccessary why did you post there. Come on, grow up. I know all your tricks to insult me. By the way, i didnt mentioned anyone's name on Kailash's talk page. You are stretching this unwanted topic. Leave all this. If you were hurt (though i know why? As i didnt mentioned anyones name) then forgive me. Im very sorry. You can continue the flc. Thanks!—

Prashant
15:44, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

"I was happy that no idiot (like last time) came with his silly comments". Who's the idiot you're referring here? —Vensatry (ping) 16:15, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

I just said it without thinking. By the way, now you want me to name another person' name and get into a new trouble. I can assure you, it wasnt you.—

Prashant
16:45, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Whoever it may be, you've been advised by many people many times that you need to maintain civility. WP is a collaborative project and not an "one-man army" as you presume. If you think that's how things work here, then this is definitely not for you. And, who is insulting others here, me? just go away! —Vensatry (ping) 16:53, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

FLC

I'll do my best, but my WP time is a bit limited at the moment -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:20, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 June 2014

Varanasi

Sorry to hear you're feeling stressed. Just to let you know a drive has begun to get this up to GA status.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:20, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Ha, not really much these days. I'll see if I can improve some sections which I'm comfortable with. —Vensatry (ping) 15:40, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 June 2014

DYK

Just a note to let you know I'm going to reject your DYK nom for now, as you haven't done your Quid Pro Quo Review. 842U (talk) 16:18, 30 June 2014 (UTC) thanks.

I'll do it asap. But I don't understand why the deadline is very short. —Vensatry (ping) 17:27, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
It's not that the deadline is short, as it is a requirement that you have completed a Quid Pro Quo before your article is advanced. I've got two DYK's that are languishing. If you could look at them I'd appreciate it:
If You Build It (film).842U (talk
) 03:18, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Bommai

Gatoclass (talk) 02:27, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

archived url --
Sriram speak up
14:09, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 4 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

false positive, you can report it to my operator
. Thanks,
talk
) 00:27, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Vensatry. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Henry Alexander Stuart-Menteth.
Message added 13:54, 5 July 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Matty.007 13:54, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 July 2014

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vensatry/Archive_23&oldid=1136128099"