User talk:WWEFan1926

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks!

I have noticed that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks!

Hi WWEFan1926, Greetings to you. All content added/edit in Wikipedia need to directly support by source/reference. Just click the "cite" button on the menu bar and fill in the info. See

• citing source - see
  WP:Tutorial/Citing sources
• citing from internet source - see
  WP:CITEWEB and its template -see Template: cite web

WWEFan1926, Good day. I have seen you adding info on UFC events at late, and do understand that the articles's inline citation is the

talk) 22:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ryan Newman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 00:46, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have reverted your edit on

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael McDowell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages William Byron and Ryan Newman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WWEFan1926 , Thank you for providing the source. Cheers.

talk) 04:36, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, WWEFan1926. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, UFC 228, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on

Hello, WWEFan1926,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether UFC 228 should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFC 228 .

If you're new to the process,

Thanks,

Hello, WWEFan1926,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether UFC 228 should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFC 228 .

If you're new to the process,

Thanks,

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Extreme Rules (2018), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Disqualification (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Michael McDowell and William Byron (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Byron (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WWEFan1926, Please note that content added need to be supported by source which you have been notified many times of such action. All content must be

talk) 01:11, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

WWEFan1926, re: UFC 230 - Penn vs Hall - Please note that when a bout is announced by the press, place the bout on "announced bout section". When the has shown on UFC.com fight card section on that particular event, then removed the bout from "announced bout section" and place it on the fight card section. Thank you.

talk) 02:04, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 01:41, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

WWEFan1926 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #22751 was submitted on Sep 22, 2018 23:01:24. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 23:01, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You need to explain that other account, User:Wweufcnascar. Drmies (talk) 01:27, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• OK, it is pretty obvious that this is you also. Unless you explain, real quick, what is going on, I will go ahead and block it, since these two accounts have way too much overlap. Drmies (talk) 01:38, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Yes. It's another account that I use, but just block or delete it. However you do it.

• OK, consider this a final warning. You've been blocked for the same thing, adding unsourced content, twice now, and you keep having to be warned about it. Next time the block is indefinite since this is more trouble than it's worth. Drmies (talk) 14:46, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 01:16, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WWEFan1926 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I don't why you are blocking me for. I have done it this whole time and now you wanna block me. What the hell dude? I make good edits so I guess you block people for that.~

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:40, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WWEFan1926 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand why I was blocked for disrupting edits even though I don't know why my edits were disrupting, but I will make useful edits from now on. Sorry that I caused this issue and I will try to not to do it anymore. I love editing the articles and doing my best to help out.

Decline reason:

Block reduced to 48hrs per below discussion. Be VERY VERY careful in your future editing. Any repetition of these issues will not be treated lightly. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:58, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• You have been asked a number of times about your edits--why they are unverified, why you don't explain what's going on, why you had an alternate account which made the same kinds of edits, etc. You've never, as far as I know, responded; you've provided edit summaries for only 1.5% of your edits. As far as the "I have done this all the time"--yeah, and that's why you got blocked last time, and that's why editors have been leaving messages here for months. Drmies (talk) 01:55, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• What do you suggest that I do about editing?
  • I don't get it. I am telling you you're blocked for making unverified and unexplained edits, and you're asking me what you should do? Drmies (talk) 02:04, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • I understand your frustration. So anytime I edit, I need to give the reasoning of my edit or provide the source. Okay, I completely understand now. Again, sorry for this whole thing. I just haven't figured it all out yet, but it's sinking in.
• Let me try and put this in very simple language. Wikipedia requires that all claims of fact that are not obviously non-controversial (i.e. the sun rises in the east) MUST be backed by a citation to a reliable independent source. This is policy. Persistently ignoring it will get you blocked. The relevant policy is
  WP:RS. I really appreciate your work here and no admin enjoys blocking editors who are obviously not malicious and who are trying to improve things. But you just keep ignoring all of these messages and warnings. It seems a block was the only way to get you to stop and talk about this. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:16, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • I understand Wikipedia's guidelines and policy. I understand that I need to start adding my sources to my edits and I understand the position that you guys are in and I appreciate your actions towards stopping this and making sure everyone follows Wikipedia's rules.
    • Great. We are making progress here. @Drmies: anything you want to add or require from WWEFan1926? -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:25, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      • Up to you, Ad Orientem... Drmies (talk) 04:48, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
        • @WWEFan1926 I am going to reduce your block to 48 hrs. I want you to spend some time reading the linked guidelines and I want you to be sure you are going to be using edit summaries and proper citations. If there is any more of this in the future you will be looking at a long term block. We like original mistakes. -Ad Orientem (talk) 04:58, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Okay thanks a lot you guys. I won't let you down.

And especially stop lying in your edit summaries. That's not fixing a typo. Keep it up and you're going to be blocked again. Enigma^msg 05:28, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia.

What part of my edit count as unsourced content and how did I lie about fixing a typo?

It clearly was not a typo. A typo means a mistake made in typing. You know full well that's not the case. A typo is if someone spells a word wrong, for example. Changing the information to something that's wrong with an edit summary like that is in bad faith. Enigma^msg 22:09, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here are recent examples of unacceptable edits: [1] [2] There are others, too. Enigma^msg 22:11, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Byron (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WWEFan1926, Greetings to you. Please note that source from random sport databases such as Tapology and Sherdot (the database sport section and not the news section), are usually not used to for inline citation for announcement of a bout. I have provided you a list of sources which you would use as per our last conversation in my talk page. If those sources have not yet reported the bout then you might want to check on other site to see if it has been reported. I have changed the source of the above page. Cheers and thank you.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mixed_martial_arts#Discussion_(Support_or_Oppose) Can you take a look at this suggestion if is good? Colton Meltzer (talk) 22:48, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On 20 November 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2018 Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 00:21, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WWEFan1926. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hhi WWEFan1926, Greetings to you. Pls note that content should be supported by source. UFC 235 fight card table source is placed underneath the table and it points to UFC.UK website and not UFC US web site for such the Wikipedia UFC 235 should reflect accordingly. An editor (not me) change the normal source from UFC US web site to UFC UK web site as after new website of UFC US, the update of the fight card is extremely slow, slower than previous, and the editor change to other UFC website for the fightcard. Please check the source before update accordingly. Thank you.

WWEFan1926, Greetings to you. As mentioned to you before, user generated sites, such as facebook, twitter and etc are considered unreliable source. Secondly the fight card in Wikipedia reflects what the source indicate (see beneath the table. Pls do not change the fight card if the source does not show the bout yet and keep the bouts in the "Announced section". Thank you.

talk) 03:10, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

WWEFan1962, You edits have been reverted. As you have been informed in the past, and here I to inform you again, the information from press is the announced bout and should be in announced bout section. The fight cards are where the bout appear in UFC web site. Pls do not moved them before they have happened. jAlso do not add 2 diff UFC website fight card into one table in the fight card section. Pls be patient and wait fora few weeks for the source to be available. Thank you.

talk) 07:01, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

WWEFan1962, You have been informed and warned many times, if you going to add/change info of the content beside superficial edit then pls provide source. Thank you.

talk) 07:14, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:50, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael McDowell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael McDowell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:10, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RMaung (WMF) 16:36, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RMaung (WMF) 15:38, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RMaung (WMF) 20:39, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

H WWEFan1926. pls do not added unsourced attendant and gate info. Add it when you have a source to back up the claim.05:31, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi the source you provide [4] have no info .

talk) 06:09, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:21, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• If you are engaged in an article
  article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards
  .
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's

WWFann 1026, pls do not move the page and change the page name until the event name is changed as per UFC.com event page. Thank you.

talk) 01:05, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

1. Pls visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Mixed martial arts and read through the MMA Wikipedia guidelines.
2. When a bout is announced which stating "finalizing, in work, rumors, verbally agreed,  in the press, this means the bout is not official yet. Wait until it official bofore place it under the "Announced bouts" section of the event page.
3. When a bout is announced in the press, editors put the match up in the  "Announced bouts" section (inline citation is needed)
4. When UFC.com / its local web site (pls check the reference beneath the fight card table in the Wikipedia page), the editors would remove the bout in the "Announced bouts" and place it in the "fight card" section.
5. When a fighter pulls from a fight (due to injury/or by UFC/ visa issues and etc), we placed the info in the "Background section" (inline citation needed) and remove the injured fighter name and put "TBD".
6. When a injured fighter has been replaced, editor put the info in the background section (with inline citation). If the new match up has not been shown in the UFC.com fight card, then we will removed the match up from the fight card and place it back to "Announced section". If the match up already shown in the UFC.com then jut put the replacement fighter in the fight card section.
7. When the event named has been announced (such as UFC Fight Night: dos Santos vs. Tuivasa) then we place the info in the background section (with inline citation). If UFC.com has shown the event name, then editor would move the article and article talk page name accordingly.
8. No colour box in the fighter's page infobox at event fight card page. No title eliminator in the fight card or body text in fighter page or event page. No (c) - champion on the event fight card unless the fighter is the current champion of the weight division.
9. "method" in the fight table is as per Sherdog.com as per
   WP:verification and not the true
   .
10. Info box as per Sherdog. No other nick names or else we would have many nicknames pop up every time there is a internet meme.
11. Reach as per UFC.com as Sherdog dont have the info. Pls provide inline citation.
12. Stand - need to provide inline citation. IF you can find source to support it, leave it blank
13. Style - "The style parameter should only be used in MMA fighters that have participated professionally or in international competitions in other combat sports (i.e. boxing or kickboxing) and who are notable in said sports and deserve an article for their merits in these other sports (i.e. Antônio Rogério Nogueira, Alistair Overeem). It is suggested to MMA editors that they actively remove the style parameter in infoboxes of MMA fighters that do not meet these criteria." Leave style for modern mma fighter as they have to train several combat disciplines.
14. No Flag icon on info box or fight table.
15. Info could be obtain from Sherdog on Info box - need to support by sources such as teachers, belts, notable relatives, university, occupation outside fighting career and etc.

An article you recently created,

WWEFan1926, hi, the event is UFC 247 and not UFN 167.

talk) 02:24, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

On 18 November 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2019 Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Black Kite (talk) 23:21, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited UFC 247, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Derrick Lewis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:14, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited UFC Fight Night: Woodley vs. Edwards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danny Roberts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:30, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:UFC Fight Night 167, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at

Thank you for your attention.

Hello, WWEFan1926. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:03, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WWEFan1926, I reverted your edit as there is no source or any second edit to indicate Cutalaba is out and I just on the web and cant find any source. As mentioned, pls add source of your edit to support the claim. If news announced his withdrawal then you are welcome to add it back. Stay safe and best.

Hi WWEFan1926, Thank you for adding the content back with source. Appreciate it. Stay safe and best.

talk) 23:49, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks Sdpdude9 (talk) 23:21, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 NASCAR Cup Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael McDowell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WWWEFan1926, Good day. Your edit of the above page has been reverted as no verbally agreed bout should be placed in the announced bout section so are no in works, targeted, rumous bouts. Thank you.

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 NASCAR Cup Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Justin Haley.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding more info, however, wrestling moves are not italicized. Please stop doing that, and please try to use more encyclopedic terminology. JDC808 ♫ 23:33, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, how are you? You've been updating the results at UFC 268 with the wrong dash (29-28), instead of the correct one (29–28). Could you please make the proper adjustments next time? Thanks Gsfelipe94 (talk) 23:24, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bellator 278, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Gallagher.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi WWEFan1926, Pls note that when you moved and then create another articleof the page above, the history edits were removed. Pls moved in a different way so all the info retained in the history log as it is important to see the history edits of the page. If you not sure how to do it, then pls leave the move to other editors who have performed the moved regularly. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 10:09, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023 NASCAR Cup Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael McDowell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2024 NASCAR Cup Series, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 NASCAR Cup Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ford.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 NASCAR Cup Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christopher Bell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]