User talk:Westroopnerd

24 June 2025
News and notes: Happy 7 millionth! In the media: Playing professor pong with prosecutorial discretion Disinformation report: Pardon me, Mr. President, have you seen my socks? Recent research: Wikipedia's political bias; "Ethical" LLMs accede to copyright owners' demands but ignore those of Wikipedians Traffic report: All Sinners, a future, all Saints, a past News from Diff: Call for candidates is now open: Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees Opinion: Russian Wiki-fork flails, failing readers and editors Debriefing: EggRoll97's RfA2 debriefing Community view: A Deep Dive Into Wikimedia (part 3) Comix: Hamburgers
Single page Front page About Subscribe Suggestions Archives

Hello! I'm Westroopnerd. Welcome to my talk page! Feel free to leave messages, feedback, or just simple discussion here. I appreciate it!

I want to contest the articles you put up for deletion. --Softstarrs23 (talk) 23:46, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Which article are you referring to? Club Atlético Newell's Old Boys II or Honolii Stream? Or both? Westroopnerd (talk) 23:49, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Both --Softstarrs23 (talk) 23:50, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To contest the first one, click the button on the red template at the top of the page that says "Contest". This will allow you to create a discussion on why the article should not be deleted. For the second, you can simply remove the template, although it could be re-nominated at

WP:AFD for a controversial nomination. Westroopnerd (talk) 23:52, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

I need mentoring. --Softstarrs23 (talk) 23:54, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you're new to Wikipedia, I strongly recommend checking out the Teahouse, that's probably the best mentoring you can get around here! Also be sure to quickly read over the five pillars of Wikipedia. Also, thanks for volunteering to help out Wikipedia! It's a great thing to do! Westroopnerd (talk) 23:58, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Nrwairport. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Suō no Naishi, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Nrwairport (talk) 06:39, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Westroopnerd,

The Dead Sea 1618 is a company that was established back in 1890. It should not go through speedy if you think it does not have a place in wikipedia. --Tarawneh (talk) 17:36, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It's important to remember that age does not mean notability. While this company is potentially notable, I see no particular indication of it on the page and found few external sources on it. I would be more than happy to put it back through AfD, if you prefer. Westroopnerd (talk) 17:39, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, gladly. There are tons of offline references, I will add them all to the article. But at the end of the day, this is not a NASDAQ company, so do not expect to find info about it online. --Tarawneh (talk) 17:47, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, I tagged Zion Lights over twenty minutes after creation, with virtually no difference in content. Westroopnerd (talk) 21:45, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cremorne Gardens, Sydney

added a link pointing to Cremorne

Eastern Illinois Railroad

added a link pointing to Metcalf

Janet Sision

added a link pointing to Kona

Shanti Tigga

added a link pointing to Jawan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks you for patrolling the article St. John's Church, Vellore. Actually, I created this article today (4 hours ago), and was in the process of editing the article, when it was patrolled, before the article was completed. Could you please review the article again. Regards "Aus_Indian (talk) 04:53, 18 August 2015 (UTC)"[reply]

Absolutely, thanks for bringing this to my attention! Westroopnerd (talk) 19:01, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I will do remember to do that in the future. Thanks for the advice and support! --

Hello, Westroopnerd. You have new messages at Jersey92's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

There was no claim of significance or importance in

Hello, Westroopnerd. You have new messages at Jersey92's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

after several days, no admin seems willing to delete. Please merge, or use afd DGG ( talk ) 05:26, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

you are right re The Washington Post. my mistake. Rjensen (talk) 02:21, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Westroopnerd. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia and for creating articles relating to the various upcoming US elections. TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:31, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick note to say thanks for creating the basic outlines on all the gubernatorial election pages- perhaps add one reference if you can for each one so it doesn't have to have that ugly "unreferenced" tag on top :) ? jcc (tea and biscuits) 12:07, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see re the above article you created. Hugo999 (talk) 01:29, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the

Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Hello, Westroopnerd. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TJ Cox 2020 talk) 01:52, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply ]

One link that says the vote tally is getting close is not enough for a Wikipedia article. What you put there belongs on the election article. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:10, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're correct Westroopnerd. There is too many editors/ips editing the

I kindly invite you to the discussion on Template talk:Infobox election#The Bolding issue to decide whether to bold the winner in the election infobox. Lmmnhn (talk) 19:21, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in the bolding issue of the election infobox earlier. We are now holding a final vote in order to reach a clear and final consensus. Please take a moment to review our discussion and vote in Template talk:Infobox election#Final voting. Lmmnhn (talk) 14:52, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain why Lesbian elvis is pointing to 2018 United States House of Representatives elections in Texas#District 3? I can't find a connection between the two. Wug·a·po·des​ 07:44, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lesbian elvis. Since you had some involvement with the Lesbian elvis redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Wug·a·po·des​ 16:51, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I undid your edit to Georgetown University but failed to link to the right discussions where we decided not to use the "Latin name" field, that should be here: Talk:Georgetown University/Archive 3#Native Name in Infobox and Talk:Georgetown University/Archive 2#Infobox. If you think we were wrong or something's changed, maybe start a new discussion on the Talk:Georgetown University page. Thanks-- Patrick, _oѺ^∞ 18:45, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]