User talk:Will Beback

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
(Redirected from
User talk:Will Beback/Revisions
)

A beer for you!

Hope you come back one day. --evrik (talk) 23:38, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Will, I hope that ArbCom takes up your appeal and agrees to allow you to return to editing. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 01:19, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Current status

redacted

Have restored this content. No reason to delete it without going through proper channels. Arbcom is free to not comment.
talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 00:25, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

handling of unblock request

At Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard#change_to_block_of_User:Will_Beback I've asked the Arbitration Committee about its response to the unblock request. —rybec 21:02, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I hope that you can soon continue the necessary, good work that you did if you can promise not be overzealous again and promise not to out people again. Andries (talk) 11:05, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Will Beback ban appeal

The Arbitration Committee has, by motion, suspended Will Beback's ("WBB") site-ban on the following terms:

  1. Suspension of ban
    1. WBB's indefinite site-ban is suspended subject to his unconditional acceptance of and continuing compliance with the terms below, the purpose of which is to enable him to return to active content work. Failure to comply fully with the letter and spirit of these terms may result in the committee revoking the suspension without warning and reinstating the indefinite ban.
    2. For purposes of enforcement, "on-wiki" refers to any edit in any namespace on the English Wikipedia or on any Project or mailing list or email system hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation or in any IRC channel with "wikipedia" or "wikimedia" in the channel name.
  2. One-way interaction ban
    1. WBB is directed to immediately cease commenting directly or indirectly on-wiki about User:TimidGuy and User:Keithbob. WBB also agrees to not communicate with the above editors, to not contact either their places of work or their colleagues, and to not seek sanctions for them, by any means.
    2. Administrators who receive requests for sanctions are requested to inform the Arbitration Committee by email.
  3. Topic ban: new religious movements
    1. WBB is indefinitely topic-banned from making any edit on-wiki about, or any edit to any page relating to, new religious movements, broadly construed.
    2. This restriction replaces WBB's existing new religious movements topic ban.
  4. Topic ban: conflicts of interest/paid advocacy; real-world identities
    1. WBB is indefinitely topic-banned from making any edit on-wiki relating to conflicts of interest, paid advocacy or the real-world identity of any editor, broadly construed.
    2. WBB agrees to not become involved in any investigation broadly construed, either on- or off-wiki, into the real-world identity of any editor or into their real-world interests and affiliations.
  5. Reconsideration of restrictions
    1. The original 2012 case has been carefully and extensively reviewed by the 2013 and 2014 Arbitration Committees, who have seen no reason to disturb it. No further review of the case will take place.
    2. No request for reconsideration of these restrictions may be made until at least twelve months have elapsed since the date on which the suspension of the ban comes into effect.

The record of the vote on the motion can be seen here. For the Arbitration Committee, Carcharoth (talk) 02:54, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back, Will!

Live long and prosper! Cullen328 Let's discuss it 03:36, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back from me too! TFD (talk) 03:42, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What they said. Writegeist (talk) 04:06, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, welcome back! Herostratus (talk) 04:32, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Great news. I personally really missed you in the areas where I edit. I'm sure you'll find enough to do outside your topic ban areas to keep you busy!

talk) 05:39, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Winter's over and Will's back? It's a good week for RL and WP. Rivertorch (talk) 13:29, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back. Smallbones(smalltalk) 13:47, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back. Andries (talk) 20:16, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I hereby join the chorus of people happy to see you back. Guy (Help!) 22:59, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw this today! It always makes me happy to see an act of justice such as this, although the restriction prohibiting policy discussion is still pretty absurd. Welcome back! ThemFromSpace 20:27, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

O! Happy Day! Will is Back! ```Buster Seven Talk 05:17, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I check your pages every couple of months to see the progress of your exile, and now, finally, you are back! Wikipedia is better for it. Welcome back to the Monkey House. Randy Kryn 18:46 22 May 2014 (UTC)

welcome back Will, the name truly fits, will be back :) look forward to seeing you in all the old places. Darkstar1st (talk) 09:17, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply] 

What happened to the "List of people who have learned Transcendental Meditation"? It's gone! What to do?! I've spent a lot of time updating it, as I suppose you have too.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.41.49.93 (talk) 13:15, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suspension of site ban

I've unblocked you per the motion suspending your site ban and will be sending a final e-mail to conclude the appeal process. I removed the tags from your user page and user talk page and reduced the protection level on your user page to allow you to edit it. Please feel free to archive your talk page in due course, though you should keep a copy of the restrictions available to refer to. Additionally, as you requested by e-mail, I'm stating here that the terms of your unban do not permit you to discuss or comment on the case that led to your ban. If you have any further questions relating to your restrictions, please e-mail us (the Arbitration Committee) in the first instance. Carcharoth (talk) 03:56, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So...

I was gonna say, it's a true test of a person to take his lumps and get back on the horse. I assumed that that you were about to pass that test since you went to the trouble of applying for reinstatement. But you haven't edited since your reinstatement after all, so dunno.

Of course maybe you're burned out or disgusted or disappointed or whatever. Of course it's 100% OK not to edit anymore, it's all purely voluntary here.

I know what I'd do though. I was kicked out of the admin corps for (IMO) insufficient reason and some people figured that I'd leave in a huff. I didn't and I like that about myself. It's a hard-knock world after all.

Everybody's different though. No criticism implied. It's entirely possible that editing doesn't work for you anymore and it's important to do what works for oneself. Best wishes whatever you do. Herostratus (talk) 18:21, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I second the motion. Smallbones(smalltalk) 18:46, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 11, 2011 attacks listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect September 11, 2011 attacks. Since you had some involvement with the September 11, 2011 attacks redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 23:50, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:GuruDevtint.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered,

Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Mdann52talk to me! 16:02, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Non-free rationale for File:GuruDevtint.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to

non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale
.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

Stefan2 (talk) 23:01, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Talk Page Protection

I have unprotected your talk page per

WP:RFPP. Mkdwtalk 14:43, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Jay8962/Fair Oaks Pharmacy and Soda Fountain

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations
for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. Whpq (talk) 17:44, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Clarification motion

A case (Transcendental Meditation movement) in which you were involved has been modified by motion which changed the wording of the discretionary sanctions section to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee --S Philbrick(Talk) 20:10, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clintogate listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Clintogate. Since you had some involvement with the Clintogate redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 21:55, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

5 Million: We celebrate your contribution

We couldn't have done it without you
Well, maybe. But the encyclopedia would not be as good.

Celebrate!

Smallbones(smalltalk) 15:27, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just hope you know

That sardonic quip at the Armenian fellow who was banned a while back about belonging to Conservapedia was lovely, considering, you know, Conservapedia bans dissenters of the hivemind, which you did because of your own commonplace belief.--Sıgehelmus (Talk) |д=) 22:04, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Nomination of
Tourism in Cumberland, Maryland
for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

Tourism in Cumberland, Maryland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted
.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tourism in Cumberland, Maryland until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

talk) 20:41, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Fifth Helena Drive listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fifth Helena Drive. Since you had some involvement with the Fifth Helena Drive redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 09:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

About Roy Cizek

As you suggested to me, I've done! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roy_Cizek https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cizek_Model_One THX! --Paolippe (talk) 16:39, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Teardrop trailer (truck) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Teardrop trailer (truck) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teardrop trailer (truck) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nightfury 15:28, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Beatles at Rishikesh.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A cheeseburger for you!

In appreciation of your tactful handling of the obvious COI at the page for A&F. Nuff said. Rags (talk) 12:33, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
When I say this hopped that Will Was Back. Unfortunately he has not made an edit since 2014. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:14, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Taylor (The Platters) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jessica Taylor (The Platters). Since you had some involvement with the Jessica Taylor (The Platters) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Anomalocaris (talk) 05:03, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Reflections of an American Political Prisoner.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retitle the L.A. Task Force

Your attention is called to the discussion

here, suggesting retitling Los Angeles Task Force to Los Angeles County Task Force. Sincerely, BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 22:20, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

MERU, Holland listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

talk) 11:26, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Checking the list

Hello. I am

WP:boldly culling the membership list of the Los Angeles Area Task Force. Some people don’t participate any more. Because you joined more than ten years ago, I am asking if you still want to be listed as a participant. I’ll be deleting those who say no or don’t answer, and then we can move merrily forward. Sincerely, BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 17:29, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago

Awesome
Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:00, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Backpacking

Please consider returning to the project. —philoserf (talk) 01:51, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of people who have learned Transcendental Meditation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of people who have learned Transcendental Meditation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people who have learned Transcendental Meditation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:04, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Transcendental Meditation practitioners has been nominated for deletion

Category:Transcendental Meditation practitioners has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 22:03, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Maharishi School logo.gif

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media
).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Hope you're doing OK. Herostratus (talk) 05:11, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jeffrey Steinberg for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeffrey Steinberg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Steinberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Location (talk) 19:10, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Prem Rawat: Contentious topic designation removed

Hello Will Beback,

As a very late update to the

contentious topic designation, previously "discretionary sanctions", originally "article probation", has been removed following a successful request for amendment.

Any actions previously taken in accordance with the contentious topic designation remain in force and are governed by the

contentious topics procedure
.

This notification may be mostly unnecessary, but as you had been a party to the original case, I thought you might be interested in hearing that after about 15 years, this remnant has been removed. Until today, it was listed at Wikipedia:General sanctions § Arbitration Committee-authorised sanctions.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:37, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maharishi Vastu Architecture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maharishi Vastu Architecture, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maharishi Vastu Architecture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Will_Beback&oldid=1186558678"