User talk:ZMGA

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

ZMGA, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi ZMGA! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi! I need some help. I don’t know how to edit semi-protected pages and I want the eligibility to. Please assist me. ZMGA (talk) 09:48, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

List of programs broadcast by Zee TV have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG
.

Thank you.

talk) 10:05, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version that you can then get feedback on. Also see Wikipedia's disambiguation guideline which indicates how to handle separate subjects with similar names. If you continue to hijack an existing article, you may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. NJD-DE (talk) 19:04, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Apologises from my end. There were no sources so I assumed. My fault. Sorry ZMGA (talk) 03:36, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Zindagi Mere Ghar Aana. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 09:05, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Where do I write a comment? Which appropriate page? ZMGA (talk) 09:21, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cancel the Deletion of the Page

Upcoming Television Series, Zindagi Mere Ghar Aana’s article is found relevant to me and I don’t think we should go ahead with it’s deletion. The series’ shooting and production had started and we are awaiting its promotional teaser too, I think the page is relevant and makes sense and I feel that we should retain it on Wikipedia, as it could be a source of information for those who are unaware of major factors of the show like the lead cast, the production house and other details. Please find my words relevant. Thankyou ZMGA (talk) 10:10, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vidroh (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
talk) 16:15, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Khelaghor moved to draftspace

An article you recently created,

general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – NJD-DE (talk) 18:52, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Hi. How do you stop the deletion of a page? ZMGA (talk) 07:24, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ogo Nirupoma
moved to draftspace

An article you recently created,

general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – NJD-DE (talk) 18:54, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to

Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. SunDawn (talk) 07:23, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Reliable sources

Please check

WP:ICTFSOURCES to know which sources are considered reliable or non reliable, we don't add information based on non reliable sources. You will also find discussion related to Tellychakkar here. Warm Regards. Sid95Q (talk) 04:04, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

As explained before not all sites on web are considered reliable. Please check
WP:ICTFSOURCES to know which sources are considered reliable by the community. You will find discussion related to IWMBuzz and Tellychakkar here. As Wikipedia works as a community, adding these sources might be consider as disruptive or vandalism as it creates problem for other users to clean. Sid95Q (talk) 08:01, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_programmes_broadcast_by_StarPlus&oldid=1024016348 shows that you are still using Tellychakkar as a source for your edit. You've been warned about this before, but you're still using it. Continuing this might get you blocked. Please find other sources to support your edit. We are the Great (talk) 18:09, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to

usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.)

Aapki Nazron Ne Samjha
added a link pointing to Bengali
Sasural Simar Ka
added a link pointing to Karan Sharma

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi please check this link Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. If you are receiving any compensation or other inducements for your contributions to Wikipedia. Sid95Q (talk) 16:29, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Not really I’m not getting paid. I just do it ZMGA (talk) 04:22, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Dhulokona, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Do not remove sourced references and break links. Run n Fly (talk) 15:19, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Appologies from my end ZMGA (talk) 16:25, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 14:32, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

WP:ICTFSOURCES even after community consensus was shown to the user Sid95Q (talk) 05:21, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sharad Malhotra. Ravensfire (talk) 18:44, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kuch Rang Pyar Ke Aise Bhi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romantic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lakshmi Ghar Aayi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lakshmi Ghar Aayi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lakshmi Ghar Aayi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 12:35, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 22

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Dhulokona
added a link pointing to Romance
Imlie
added a link pointing to Bengali
Lakshmi Ghar Aayi
added a link pointing to Romance
Pandya Store
added a link pointing to Romance

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mann Kee Awaaz Pratigya 2

Information icon Hello, I'm Jellysandwich0. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mann Kee Awaaz Pratigya 2 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Father, mother, uncle, aunt, husband, wife, son, and daughter were incorrectly capitalised. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 12:06, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

English

In Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai you repeatedly capitalised words that should not be. Please write correctly when contributing to English Wikipedia. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 17:30, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:13, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Disambiguation link notification for June 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anupamaa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ahmadabad.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

MOS:TV to know TV articles related guidelines Sid95Q (talk) 06:37, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Shree Krishna Bhakto Meera
moved to draftspace

Please see log comments. MrsSnoozyTurtle 09:06, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moved back to mainspace as it passes
WP:GNG. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 14:41, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Thankyou 💟 ZMGA (talk) 15:18, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lakshmi Ghar Aayi

Hello, ZMGA,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started,

deletion review process
instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 20:44, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shree Krishna Bhakto Meera for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shree Krishna Bhakto Meera is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shree Krishna Bhakto Meera until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:31, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- RoySmith (talk) 17:59, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Very surprising. A while before, I've seen this user adding reliable sources and reverting edits that are unreliable, so it's ironic that he would be a sockpuppet of a user that kept adding unreliable sources. Something's very fishy. We are the Great (talk) 20:36, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ZMGA (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I do not understand why I have been blocked. Please try and understand, I have completely tried my best to contribute to Wikipedia. I have made pages, surely I have made mistakes of adding unreliable sources and that was only because I didn't know what reliable sources were. Now, I have in fact being removing unreliable sources and adding reliable ones. ZMGA (talk) 03:17, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:19, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ZMGA (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have understood my mistake and I will definitely not repeat this again. I was confused initially on what my mistake was, however, I have now realised my wrong and am apologising for the same. I will not cause any disturbances again and not repeat any mistakes committed before. Instead of repeating these mistakes, I will try my level best to make Wikipedia a better place for viewers to read and I will only develop articles and not cause any damage or disruption. I am sincerely apologetic for all my mistakes and I can give you the assurance that I will not repeat my mistakes again. Thankyou. ZMGA (talk) 21:09, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are paraphrasing the last decline message. You need to say what your mistake was, and how you will handle situations differently. Also, you need to say what contributions you will make if you are unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 01:47, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ZMGA (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello. I apologize for not agreeing to the Wikipedia Guidelines. My mistake was abusing multiple accounts and I am apologetic for the same. In the future, if you find my reason of unblock valuable, I can assure that I will not commit this mistake again of abusing multiple accounts and I will handle the situation differently from now on and not abuse any accounts. All I wish to do in the future is make Wikipedia a better place for readers. Speaking about what future contributions to Wikipedia, I want to develop Draft:Zindagi Mere Ghar Aana and current pages. I would also love to develop the current pages and clarify the pages which aren't defined. However, I will not abuse any users and instead, I will handle things differently and explain the reason of any reverts or additions, rather than abusing. My core dream is only to make Wikipedia a better place and I didn't realise that while doing this, I have made mistakes. However, now I have now realized all faults and will not commit them again. My only wish is that together, all of us editors can make Wikipedia a better place. Once again, Thankyou for making me realize my mistakes and I will never commit them again. Stay Safe, Thankyou. ZMGA (talk) 06:19, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have used many, many sock accounts, and are now subject to a site ban per

WP:3X. Any future request to lift the ban should come from your main account, so I am revoking talk page access to this account. Girth Summit (blether) 13:15, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply
]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi! I have submitted my reason of unblock on my talk page. Please go through it and I hope you find it helpful.

Regards, ZMGA. ZMGA (talk) 16:49, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Bhagya Lakshmi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional article by sockpuppet account.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrsSnoozyTurtle 03:21, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding
Draft:Ogo Nirupoma

request
that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

talk) 19:03, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Hello, ZMGA. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vidrohi
".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion
. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:02, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]