User talk:ZMGA
ZMGA, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi ZMGA! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 11 April 2021 (UTC) |
Hi! I need some help. I don’t know how to edit semi-protected pages and I want the eligibility to. Please assist me. ZMGA (talk) 09:48, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
April 2021
Very surprising. A while before, I've seen this user adding reliable sources and reverting edits that are unreliable, so it's ironic that he would be a sockpuppet of a user that kept adding unreliable sources. Something's very fishy. We are the Great (talk) 20:36, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
ZMGA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I do not understand why I have been blocked. Please try and understand, I have completely tried my best to contribute to Wikipedia. I have made pages, surely I have made mistakes of adding unreliable sources and that was only because I didn't know what reliable sources were. Now, I have in fact being removing unreliable sources and adding reliable ones. ZMGA (talk) 03:17, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:19, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ZMGA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have understood my mistake and I will definitely not repeat this again. I was confused initially on what my mistake was, however, I have now realised my wrong and am apologising for the same. I will not cause any disturbances again and not repeat any mistakes committed before. Instead of repeating these mistakes, I will try my level best to make Wikipedia a better place for viewers to read and I will only develop articles and not cause any damage or disruption. I am sincerely apologetic for all my mistakes and I can give you the assurance that I will not repeat my mistakes again. Thankyou. ZMGA (talk) 21:09, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You are paraphrasing the last decline message. You need to say what your mistake was, and how you will handle situations differently. Also, you need to say what contributions you will make if you are unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 01:47, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ZMGA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello. I apologize for not agreeing to the Wikipedia Guidelines. My mistake was abusing multiple accounts and I am apologetic for the same. In the future, if you find my reason of unblock valuable, I can assure that I will not commit this mistake again of abusing multiple accounts and I will handle the situation differently from now on and not abuse any accounts. All I wish to do in the future is make Wikipedia a better place for readers. Speaking about what future contributions to Wikipedia, I want to develop Draft:Zindagi Mere Ghar Aana and current pages. I would also love to develop the current pages and clarify the pages which aren't defined. However, I will not abuse any users and instead, I will handle things differently and explain the reason of any reverts or additions, rather than abusing. My core dream is only to make Wikipedia a better place and I didn't realise that while doing this, I have made mistakes. However, now I have now realized all faults and will not commit them again. My only wish is that together, all of us editors can make Wikipedia a better place. Once again, Thankyou for making me realize my mistakes and I will never commit them again. Stay Safe, Thankyou. ZMGA (talk) 06:19, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You have used many, many sock accounts, and are now subject to a site ban per
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hi! I have submitted my reason of unblock on my talk page. Please go through it and I hope you find it helpful.
Regards, ZMGA. ZMGA (talk) 16:49, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
The article Bhagya Lakshmi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Promotional article by sockpuppet account.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrsSnoozyTurtle 03:21, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Ogo Nirupoma
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.
Your draft article, Draft:Vidrohi (TV series)
Hello, ZMGA. It has been over six months since you last edited the
".In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:02, 30 March 2022 (UTC)