User talk:Zer0431/Archive 1

Under the

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Phgao 02:42, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, sorry but I believe those pages usually do not go in the Mainspace and are usually part of Wikipedia space. Hence, I think you can add it to the W. Project it is related to as a subpage. Hope that helps! Phgao 02:51, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can't seem to locate the WP page, but you can move the page or just create it and copy/paste the stuff over! Glad I could help! Phgao 02:57, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I didnt mean to send you the tag twice! And thanks for moving it! Phgao 03:09, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to

talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 02:55, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply

I have also moved Fledgeling WikiProject Small Engines to your userspace (

User:Gp75motorsports/Fledgeling WikiProject Small Engines). Regards, пﮟოьεԻ 57 12:00, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Why did you warn this user that the account was indefinitely banned from wikipedia? (See your edit). The block that was imposed was only for 24 hours - block log.

talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 14:30, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply

Replied there.--Isotope23 ^talk 14:34, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be alerted whenever

assuming good faith. Remember, most of your fellow editors share your goal of making the article better, and should be treated with kindness and respect. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:06, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

This edit is inappropriate. You do not have the power to ban users. And even if you did, this user is not banned. And you made this edit hours after being warned after making a similar edit. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:06, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hm. Wonder if it's RickK returned.  :) Probably not, though. Corvus cornix 17:29, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know that Wikipedia has an

I agree with

WP:ADOPT would probably be a very good idea (I wish I had thought of that).--Isotope23 ^talk 12:47, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Thankyou for your interset in the Union of Wikipedia Users...I was informed that making an account for the purposes of it being a Union, group ex. was against Wiki laws...or something like that. Therefore we are removing the User: U.W.U. page on Monday, October 22nd. However we do plan on having something like an Alliance to ensure accuracy in articles. We (me and User: Greenwood1010) will contact you soon (most likely on friday or monday) Thankyou! --King of Nepal 13:00, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you forming a new group? We can still work togather with out a page1 Rush me info about this new group. Are you taking over the UWU? I resigned as Chairman today...you have to talk to User: Greenwood1010 he is the new chairman. Thanks --King of Nepal 13:38, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am the Chairman of the Union of Wikipedia Users and I go to the uwu page and see that some one is claiming to be in charge of the uwu and says that I am vice-president...of my own group of which i am chairman? What is going on here? Please contact me right away!User: Greenwood1010 —Preceding comment was added at 13:51, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to relocate it and all that...fine. It's just taht you should have let me know, or did you think my friend, User: King of Nepal was still chairman? Anyhow I am incharge of UWU and your renaming of the group does not change that...however give me a day to think, I like your ideas...please drop by and leave me a message of your plans...BUT I AM IN CHARGE... however I do need a Vice-Chaiman, interseted? User: Greenwood1010 —Preceding comment was added at 13:57, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I see that Greenwood contacted you. Hope all is going well. I have to log out, but keep up the goog work. I will get in touch with you on monday, around 10 a.m. ok well just make sure that the group does not break any of Wikipedia's laws ok!? ByeUser: King of Nepal —Preceding comment was added at 14:03, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok then, it all sounds very confusing. One request however, is there anyway that we can stop using the User: UWU page, from what i've heard using a username for somthing like this is against wikipedia's laws. can we move the alliance to another page/link (forgive me I'm not good with "computer talk") Anyhow you seem to know what you are doing. It is just that the user name, User: U.W.U. is one of my personal accounts and I already have one so I'm trying to have it deleted. (it seems both me and King of Nepal are having troble with our signature!! User: greenwood1010 —Preceding comment was added at 14:13, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean it will get us banned, and how do you delete it? Everytime I go to User: U.W.U. your name followed by the WAU show up, conatct me right away. Stop submitting all info. My e-amil is [email protected] if have to leave soon so i will have to talk torromow, but i'm still hear untill 10:55am User: U.W.U. AKA User:Greenwood1010

For now I say that we delete all UWU and WUA stuff, then talk later and regroup...did you say that you submitted the WUA stuff to wiki? I am just going to delete all UWU & WUA stuff for now...however I can't remove my account. Did you link User: U.W.U. to your acciount?[[--Greenwood1010 14:30, 18 October 2007 (UTC)]][reply]

Ok i won't remove the User:Gp75motorsports/Wikipedia Users' Alliance page. But when you type in User: U.W.U. it takes me to the page with this at top. So ok it's my 2nd account..umm but your in control of it? Anyhow I just hope it all works out, it would be a nine thing: I have a gov idea, i'll post it in a minute:--U.W.U. 14:41, 18 October 2007 (UTC) Government Idea[reply]

You seem to know more than I do about how this all works so how about if the WUA is run by a council, but for the most part it only handles judicial type things (expelling members, interviewing those who want to become members ex.) The Chairman (that’s me) will have veto power and overall authority, however the President (you) will be appointed by the Chairman and will handle overall administrative duties (setting up the pages, planning meetings ex.) That is how many companies are run, with a CEO, Chairman, Board of Directors and then an administrative President. Does this sound ok? Anyhow for now it will be me, Chairman, you Vice- Chairman. I have to go in 5 minutes so we will talk tomorrow, around 10 am? Is that ok? Anyhow bye and I look forward to working with you. Keep me up to date and see you tomorrow.--U.W.U. 14:48, 18 October 2007 (UTC) aka User: Greenwood1010[reply]

I also made some minor changes to the User: U.W.U. page --U.W.U. 14:50, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but the problem I foresee is that there already is a

No, I didn't really think so.  :) Corvus cornix 20:21, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that

Have you gone to any of the links that people have sent me? Listen if we want to do this than we have to do it legally, the Wikipedia way. Someone said that there is alreadly a counter-vandelism group. Just go to the links please. I'll send them in a minute.--Greenwood1010 12:28, 19 October 2007 (UTC) Links

Both you and I are indeed working on the same side, I want to help wikipedia, as do you. By the way did you go to the links? Any how I am going to make a few minor changes to the WUA page. What time is the meeting on Monday? As "Chairman" I should plan the meetings"--Greenwood1010 12:39, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think that we should get rid of the titles, at least for now. It seems to burocratic so for now lets get rid of them. I'll change tem to Over-all Director (me) Administraive Director (you)--Greenwood1010 12:40, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Esperanza A very interesting link--Greenwood1010 12:45, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have a class to go to, be back at 10am...i cant make the meeting if it is at 7am.--Greenwood1010 12:51, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

my e-mail is (removed).com if you do have e-mail ok, but if you do send one so i can have your e-mail address --User: Greenwood1010 12:57, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. :) To prevent conversation fork, I would really prefer to continue the conversation at Wikipedia_talk:Counter-Vandalism_Unit#Help.21 so that other members of CVU can quickly see and take part. In any event, I had posted my follow-up before your revision to your note on my talk page. :) I'll be watching Wikipedia_talk:Counter-Vandalism_Unit#Help.21, so you can be sure I'll see any answers you put there. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:12, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I hate to have to do this but as Chairman i am firing you. King of Nepal want s to be VC, THEN i AM GOING TO RESIGN AND HE WILL BE CHAIR, THEN HE WILL MAKE A STATEMENT SAYING THAT ALL CHAIRMAN TITILES ARE ABOLISHED then we can go about are work. Please note, I'm not saying stop working on this, i'm saying you no longer hold the title of vc, however all titles are about to be done away with in a few minutes by the King of Nepal...ok?--Greenwood1010 14:16, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am here to inform you that you are herby removed from your postion as Vice-Chairman and that I am replacing you.--King of Nepal 14:25, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greenwood1010 has resigned as Chairman, therefore this makes ME the rightful successor to the postion as Chairman. Thank you. I will be making a brief statment in a few minutes. His Excellency --King of Nepal 14:27, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

“As Chairman of the Wikipedia Users Alliance I herby abolish the offices of Chairman and Vice-Chairman in an effort to ensure that WUA is in complete compliance with all of Wikipedia’s laws and regulations and that the group will be open to all Wikipedians without them having to follow or report to a Chairman, President or anything of that nature. This action shall take place at 10:35 today, October 19, 2007. This is my last act as Chairman and while it does sadden me, I know that it is what’s best for the WUA. Thank you and may the heavenly spirits bless the success of the Wikipedia Users Alliance. Sincerely, His Excellency Founder and Chairman of the Wikipedia Users Alliance,--King of Nepal 14:32, 19 October 2007 (UTC) "[reply]

What do you mean where legal...they took the idea???!!!!--King of Nepal 14:42, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We're not doing that anymore. Now we're just a normal project with no heiarchy whatsoever. Best, --

It's still completely redundant with several other groups, and no specific purpose for this new group has been presented. --Onorem♠Dil 14:46, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why wa sI removed as a member of WUA, i just resigned as chairman , not as a member...all well we all make mistakes, anyhow I'll add my name to the list--Greenwood1010 14:50, 19 October 2007 (UTC)-- 14:49, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you go to my page or King of Nepal 's page you will notice a list of ranks that we held before ranks where done away with. I want to add one to your page...ok--Greenwood1010 14:52, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have to go to work...I may be on over the weekend, but i can't make the monday meeting unless it starts at 10 am. your friend --Greenwood1010 15:40, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:AzaToth's got a pretty good one. User:The Transhumanist of course is widely recognized as the userpage expert, but you probably already know that. My adoptee, User:Audacitor has a pretty good one as well. Hope this helps some. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 16:25, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, glad to help. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 16:34, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You may remember me from the rumors of RickK coming back to Wikipedia. Anyway, I would like to join you Alliance. How do I sign up? -

I am back, but only for 10 minutes...how is everything going? how is the WUA coming...--Greenwood1010 22:21, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did see what you did...it is great. Thanks for all your hard work. FYI King of Nepal went to Bhutun today, he'll be back in 5 days. Keep up the good work. Long Live the WUA!!! I also put the wua member logo on your page. did you change the monday meeting time from 7 to 10 am?--Greenwood1010 00:15, 21 October 2007 (UTC) sorry i have to go.[reply]

The link was a dudd--Greenwood1010 01:13, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am writting a statment to post on the debate page it will take a few mins. for me to finish-long live wua--Greenwood1010 01:48, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks..it took me awhile to write it, but like you i really want the wua to work! i am glad that we got to meet each other. i am making a few changes tot he wua page, i'll let you know when i am done--Greenwood1010 02:33, 21 October 2007 (UTC) long live the wua[reply]

I finished making a few changes to the site, as well as adding my "speech" to the discussions page (i am going to do that in a minute) add one of your wua related mottos at the bottom of the page!--Greenwood1010 02:49, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your name at the end of the quote at the bottom of the first page of the wua..thanks--Greenwood1010 02:58, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

go to the dissucions page on the wua site...some one nomiated it for deletion!!! do something i don't know what to do--Greenwood1010 03:00, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

please send me the link...i am also trying to contact the king of nepal--Greenwood1010 03:12, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your message at the deletion discussion, and I apologize for having to remove it. I would answer your question now, but I honestly didn't understand what you were asking. Please let me know via my talk page if you'd like to discuss anything.

Dear fiend, I have to go :( but i will be back on monday around 10 am hopefully i may be able to be here on sunday. anyhow i shall pray to Lord Buddha that all goes well and wish you the best of luck. --Greenwood1010 03:47, 21 October 2007 (UTC) ps thank you so much for all of the hard work that you have put into the WUA[reply]

...I've said what I can. Good luck. If it gets deleted, who knows what will happen... -

I can't seem to find the link to the page where we where debating the deletion...could you send it to me?--Greenwood1010 19:40, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Gp75motorsports/Wikipedia Users' Alliance

Equazcion • argue/improves • 19:51, 10/21/2007

I found it and left a comment--Greenwood1010 20:03, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Look, IF WORSE COMES TO WORST WE CAN HAVE AN "UNOFFICAL "ALLIANCE""--Greenwood1010 20:58, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...and I replied. I did what I can. I know you're serious. But, unfortunately, I don't think we are going to survive. -

As I am still in school I have a math test to retake so I will not be able to go to the meeting...sorry. I know that you changed the time for me--Greenwood1010 13:03, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My day today

8-9 math class 9-10 computer time 10-1030 math retest 1030 go home 1100 work so the only time i am free is ... right now!--Greenwood1010 13:07, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Look when WUA is deleted then we should not repost it...I am opposed to that idea...however we could have a wua in "exile" type thing... by this i mean that we still could get together on one of are disscussions page and talk about articles we edited or whatever and we would have on officla webpage or whatever just wiki friends united in an unoffical group. With a form of gov you know, but no username site or anything like we have now...what do you think--Greenwood1010 13:25, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No talk page...first lets go to the debate page and in a nice mannner say that we now will no longe roppose the deletion...second did you send me a e-mail...3rd the group will have on page or anything like that--Greenwood1010 13:30, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have to go :( when it is deleted don't do anything... don't repost it... I will handle the exile part...best wishes...long live the spirit of the wua!--Greenwood1010 14:06, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am also going to rmove most of the content on the wua page and make a brief statment on it.--Greenwood1010 14:08, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am back...for a little bit, just failed the test...anyhow give me time to think...we will just all meet in a disscusions room and give advice to one another about editing/fighting vandelsim...not today...I'll send you an e-mail on Wensday (so give me your address (e-mail)). Also leave a comment on the deletion disscussion page...I did along with the King of Nepal--Greenwood1010 14:55, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have to go to work...see you tommorrow...9-930am--Greenwood1010 15:43, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your comment about wanting all the Inheritance characters to have their own articles... So do I!! But unfortunately.... there are limits. And they won't let me recreate the Murtagh article. T_T

Love, --MurtaghxMisery 17:19, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to

talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 01:11, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply

Sorry, but you can't circumvent a

deletion decision by creating a new page in another section... it will just get deleted again.--Isotope23 ^talk 12:36, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Hey are you there? contact me!!!--Greenwood1010 14:38, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Gp75motoersports, I, His Majisty, the King of Nepal, hereby infrom you that you will be awarded the RNA on November 1, 2007. I shall give you more info in the next week.--King of Nepal 14:52, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How about an Accuracy on the Internet Alliance group. (Now, for all of you who are watching this page...THIS IS NOT A WIKIPROJECT GROUP. I am not trying to start another "movement" So before all of you freak out, I suggest you finish reading this message) I mean that we would go around to different websites (Wikipedia, About.com AND MANY OTHERS) and insure that the info was accurate. Ok? Like, for example we would go to a history website and make sure everyhting was true...get what I am saying? (Now Gp75mot...I know you like wikipedia...but you can't just do wikipedia, you have to do other sites as well...ok?) Anyhow think about. Your friend--Greenwood1010 12:46, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you pay the fees for the domain name and hosting, pretty much whatever you want to within the boundaries of the law wherever your site is being hosted. There is all kinds of free software out there to set up forums, etc. Heck you can even download the MediaWiki software and host your own wiki for you and your friends.--Isotope23 ^talk 16:28, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can do anything you like on your own domain. But... aren't you overthinking this a little bit? I work to improve the quality and accuracy of Wikipedia. I have online friends who help me. I don't need to organize a group to do this, I just... do it. People who have the same goals work with me, and we have a nice social little time while getting useful work done, all without a separate web site or any formal organization. I think you might end up finding that the organization distracts you from the work you want to do, rather than helping you do it- we've had much larger organizations at Wikipedia try what you're doing, and in general, it hasn't worked nearly as well as just getting on with the work of building the encyclopedia. Still, off-wiki, it's entirely up to you, and I wish you success in whatever you end up doing. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:34, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am actually working on writing it.... I couldn't find a wikibox that said 'this user is writing a book' or something similar.

It's called Saving Maharazhad: The Prophecy

Email me at [email protected] for the summary.... for Wikipedia is not a social place to just sit and chat about my wonderful book.

yours truly,

Éowyn

♥~♥~♥ —Preceding unsigned comment added by MurtaghxMisery (talk • contribs) 17:29, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I got your message...I will be "out" for a few days...be back on monday. So we will talk more about the group then...put for now send me an e-mail...I don't like how every one can read what I am saying...writ...whatever. If you like just set up an account on yahoo. Contact me on my page--Greenwood1010 12:20, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You here? contact me...i am in my computer class--Greenwood1010 13:52, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Special Barnstar
		I, Greenwood1010, herby due award, Gp75motorsports this award in recognition for your hard works towards progressing the Wikipedia Users’ Alliance forward. Thank you--Greenwood1010 14:10, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Even though the WUA was shut down, your efforts where greatfully appreciated.

And I, too give you this:

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		I, Goodshoped35110s, hereby due award, Gp75motorsports this award in recognition for your hard works towards progressing on the WUA. One of two barnstars!

That was a really good idea. Too bad it was deleted. Enjoy! -

ed 03:40, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

In fact I was going to remove them myself as they were added in a long time ago plus I no longer add trivia stuff. Willirennen 16:28, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi...I am back...I'll be online untill 11:40 am...anyhow, how have you been? We will have to talk about A.I.A. soon, but not today. Anyhow King of Nepal was going ot come back from Bhutan on Friday, but something came up, he'll be back on Thursday.--Greenwood1010 14:05, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry but I have to go...see you tuesday, 9-9:30 am, goodbye--Greenwood1010 15:40, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated User:Your Username/Userboxes/Gran Turismo World Championship (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Г^edʃtǁcɭ 22:59, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See the

On your

I just got a message from one of the wikipeida nazis that says that we can't have title boxes...they said WUA was too buracratic? good Lord...it's wikipedia that is TOO buracratic. Those communistic administrators...and he said that we can not disscuss the plans via wikipedia...by the way he most likely has been watching our page (communism any one? "big brother sees all!) I am sure that other liberla-commi administrtors are watching too (hi commis)excuse the spelling, i am in a hurry. so we'll talk later bye.--Greenwood1010 18:19, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this barnstar because you found my hidden page! Here it is:

		Hidden Junkyard Gallery Barnstar!
		This User Found Goodshoped's Secret gallery! Have you found it yet?

-

The November 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 15:32, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Thanks for the statusbot box on my talk page, it's pretty cool. As you can probably tell, I've been busy lately. Life is crazy right now, but I hope to be able to get on and edit more often than I have been. Happy editing. Sbacle 23:17, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to say hi!--Greenwood1010 00:28, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry that I haven't contacted you in awhile, I was supposed to be back from Bhutan, but there was an accident. An American friend of mine was badly hurt in a accident, so I am still here...hopfuly I will be home soon...bye.--King of Nepal 13:32, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

logged on, will be here until 10:45 ok--Greenwood1010 13:35, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is me again, how are you! I am doing ok? Say do you like Neon Genesis Evangelion? (Where did that question come from?) --Greenwood1010 18:37, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See the link on the subject? That might be him. That might be him! -

And a reply: I don't really care. -

ed 00:40, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Yes i went to the link, i will look at your story when I get more time and I also saw the wua thing...apparently the girl who was traveling with our friend King of Nepal died...though I have not yet been able to confirm it (heard it from a close family member of his)--Greenwood1010 14:43, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to

talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 02:18, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

Please note that I have delisted your nomination to join the Arbitration Committee from the list of candidate statements, as you do not meet the criteria for nomination (623 edits to 02:29, 12 November 2007 (UTC), requires 1000 edits to 00:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC)). Thank you, Daniel 02:29, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For now...don't do anything, that could be seen as ...something. Allow the opposers and supporters to add more info and then say...after a month, then protect it from editing. I have to go a 9:10(am) but wil be back at 10:10 (am) ok? bye...ps the girl that the King of Nepal was traveling with passed away.--Greenwood1010 13:48, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm now working of a Javascript solution to being able to view the history of just a single section. Of course it won't be quite as good as if it were in the software itself, but I think it'll do.

With the watchlist I'm not quite sure but how I would do it yet, though I'm not quite sure I understand what you were asking for in your original proposal. You talk about scrolling down to a section, bure surely you're aware that you can click on the little arrow next to a section name to go straight to it? -- DatRoot 22:19, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care really, As long as you specify that you are a different person than I am. Wikidudeman ^(talk) 18:22, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I mean on your techsupportguy profile. Just a brief not saying "Not the same person as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Wikidudeman. Wikidudeman ^(talk) 17:33, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. Wikidudeman ^(talk) 17:31, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I really do support any conclusion to this matter. However Giove and myself already made an agreement wich he broke within 48 hours (with circa 15 edits). He accepted my proposal for us both to stop editing because of the possible restriction, but went on as per usual. This is just an example, I'm afraid, and I'm skeptical because of this, but will do my best.
Every time there is a historical/ethnic conflict people (not excluding myself sometimes) are prone to irrational conversation and dubious arguments, Giove, however, is beyond all this, he just emakes a dozen edits and "explains" them with an uncompromising sentence or two, the reply to wich he does not answer.

Hope someone does. I think even most Italian editors realize he is behaving irrationally. With the possible exception of the so-called "esuli" (eng: "exiles") editors, people who left territories in

TALK) 15:52, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi, Gp75motorsports.
Few notes: the best description of Giove's behaviour is on the Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Dalmatia/Evidence, section "Evidence present by Kubura"..
About user PIO. See this : Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration/Dalmatia#Statement_by_semi-involved_PIO. Also, I think that PIO has a history of certain words against admins on it.wiki (I think Ilario).
Also, user Cherso is a "one-time edit" user. Possibly a sockpuppet of Giove himself, or of his banned collaborant Giorgio Orsini.
Sincerely, Kubura 09:02, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How would you propose to go through with solving this problem?

Hope it works.

TALK) 19:16, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Where exactly is the new ARBCOM?

TALK) 19:19, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

So, wait, what am I supposed to do here again? -

ed 04:10, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

(sarcastic voice:) No, that's not true, we're the "right" party. You will believe in me: just question of time. ;)

TALK) 19:55, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

LoL!

TALK) 19:52, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Or Atavan. --

talk) 17:04, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

...or Windex. I told you to put that stuff up. --

talk) 01:32, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi, as you now I am the President of the inactive (but trying to be active) Accuary on the Internet Alliance (in no way connected to Wikipedia) Any how I have decieded to resign because I do not have the time, King of Nepal is busy in Bhutna, he was supposed to come back almost a month ago, but the girl he was traveling with was killed in a car crash over there...so another friend of mine will take over as acting president...anyhow you are aware that Wikipedia and it's communist adm. do not want people talking about "clubs" on this site...we need to arrange for each other to get each other's e-mail address. Please contact me as soon as possible. Thank you. --Greenwood1010 03:43, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, that's the first time I've ever seen admins called "communists"... usually we are referred to as fascists, though I personally consider myself an absurdist.--Isotope23 ^talk 01:24, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I could have used the term fascists ...after all wiki. admins. are trying to nationalize wikipedia...I just really hate communists.--Greenwood1010 (talk) 01:45, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, could use the wikilink ;D

And I'm not sure whether you're interested in this, but me and TigerShark are investigating this sock who kept putting flaccid objects on Ronald McDonald, PeeWee Herman, and J.K. Rowling, as well as my userpage. We're about to do a checkuser on him right now. Best, -

ed 00:20, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Well, if you want, you can review the case

ed 04:15, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Sweet. I'll be back tonight at 20:00 PST with updates. -

ed 22:58, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Your behavior is going worst and worst. I'm just trying to resolve, you put a tag without references, now you have to provide evidences for your accuses and your insults. --

talk) 12:07, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

I'm glad you did not acted in bad faith, anyway you acted bad. I ask for the FOURTH times evidences for your accuse of sockpuppetry. (I do not care of Dalmatia, now, and you are not competent on it). Begin to realize that you was the further victim of a group on nationalist, from one of the more nationalist country in Europe (see

talk) 12:12, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Aaah biase, national labelling.... Giove's favourite "weapons."

TALK) 21:49, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

If you want to do something really useful in regards to this, rather than hounding Giovanni, keep an eye out for LEO. He tends to make talkpage edits in Italian. Given the fact that he is a troll evading multiple blocks with a rotating IP, you can revert him on sight and send his IP my way.--Isotope23 ^talk 13:51, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hey stranger. this is Eowyn. I am changing my novel's title to Night Shall End In Day. Just a head's up 4 you. how is life? I am doing great, and I can send you a summary for my novel if you'd like, by email.

love, --MurtaghxMisery (talk) 19:18, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

three books AND a fanfic? I'm working on two books, one smaller. NSEID is going well. I just have limited time on the computer. bleh. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MurtaghxMisery (talk • contribs) 15:49, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My life is okay, also. If you consider maintaing six sibsings, and having to chase two of them out of my room daily, and having to feed the fussiest baby in the entire universe, nonetheless carry him around (that 20 pound turkey) okay. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MurtaghxMisery (talk • contribs) 15:54, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I can understand why you ask, but no, I'm not

Sorry? Have I asked you something about him? --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 19:55, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you've finally been reviewed, sorry for the long wait! delldot talk 02:00, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

a/c) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile

}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

(Oh.) That's why I reported it a few days back (Giove's third sockpuppeteering report). It was considered possible and that was the end of it. I don't think anything can be done... :(

TALK) 23:04, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

I am being nom. for deletion...is it a joke?'Or is it for real? Please help me. I have to get off soon...i will be back on tuesday at 9 am...please help!!!--Greenwood1010 (talk) 23:21, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you kidding me... I thought it was for real and was swearing at my brother Zak who will not shut up...I just removed half the stuff on my user page because I thouht that it was for real...I am about to scream at my brother...Iwas so worried that they had finally gotten me...but it is just a joke?! I have to go now, thankyou and bye.--Greenwood1010 (talk) 23:28, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How are things going with the Dalmatia issue? I've been out of touch lately so I'd like to know if I missed anything...

I've been meaning to ask, is there any way to "overturn" or at least shorten an ARBCOM restriction? I was hoping to appeal on the grounds that, while I did engage in edit-waring, I did so merely in response to Giove's incessant outrageous edits in an attempt to prevent their corruption, while duscussing every time. If there is a way, do you think I may stand a chance?

TALK) 22:11, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

I know, you're absolutely right. I'll get round to it one of these days. Never seems the most important thing to do, though. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 23:13, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've suggested to Goodshoped35110s that he and StopTaoSpam simply keep away from each other, given the disinclination of anyone to block the username, and his apparent efforts to clean up linkspam. I'll have a separate word about his reaction to the UAA report and reverts with him. Acroterion _(talk) 03:22, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see, my supposed sock puppetry was an invention of D. together the "Greater Croatia Assault troupes", as you can see, they are again trying to accuse me of sockpuppetry with Leo and others. D. is just a troll, realize it. Meanwhile you have accused ME, to be a vandal and a sockpuppet. Wake up, boy! --

I do not care if you report me, claiming that "this guy is PERHAPS a sockpuppet of xxx, please check him. But you put a label on my page, without evidences, and you called me VANDAL. I am still waiting for your apologies, meanwhile think about the army, and how it cheats you day after day. Wake up, boy! --

talk) 14:45, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

This might be a good time for the two of you to disengage from each other. If LEO also uses a named account, it's very likely not Giovanni; it's someone else entirely. Giovanni is most certainly not Afrika Paprika... I've dealt with AP enough that I'm certain of this. Beyond that, disparagingly ending your posts with "wake up, boy"! is completely non-helpful, Giovanni. I'm going to suggest that you simply drop it at this point. No need to extend the drama. --Isotope23 ^talk 14:54, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The best way you can help this situation is to disengage. While I know you are trying to help here, you are ratcheting up the situation. Please walk away for now and let it cool down.--Isotope23 ^talk 15:06, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That ok. I just ask to GP to stay far from me. Thank you Isotope.--

talk) 15:11, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Isotope, are you really gonna take this guys side? If he's "just trying to help," why does he have a the longest blocklog I've ever seen? Should you decide to take part in this dispute again, all I ask is that you remain neutral.

TALK) 20:56, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

I don't think Isotope's taking anybody's side. It does us both good to take a breather. --

talk) 21:57, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

You should put some kind of explanation in your edit summaries. The IP is accusing you of vandalism. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:13, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The IP accuses everyone of vandalism. None of the edits really are, and the matter is discussed in the talkpage. --

TALK) 20:59, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Oh, I'm pretty used to his various accusations by now. At one time or another, these included vandalism, personal attacks, sockpuppetry, etc... --

TALK) 21:55, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Like I said, I'm skeptical. This guy didn't stop when we concluded a personal agreement and he took no notice of his ARBCOM restriction... --

TALK) 21:57, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

I'll do my best to remain above the fray. However, when you patiently look into stuff, get it properly sourced and updated, and GG comes along with 17 edits in an afternoon, well... AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 22:14, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Really? I'm eagerly waiting. :-)
AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 22:22, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but your prompting has inspired me to fix it up, so no need to worry. It's basic but looks OK. Thanks again. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 09:19, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Accuracy on the Internet Alliance has been having some trouble...I was able to form a Board of Directors...myself and 7 of my friends (sorry that I didn't ask you to join...I dindn't ask the King of Nepal as well) anyhow....on November 22 I resigned as President and the King of Nepal took over after the BOD voted him in 4 to 3 and today he said he will resign at 12 noon...as you know he is still in Nepal, was supposed to be back Oct 26! but that girl died in an accident and well he is still there...would you like to become the acting president for now?...lost your email please send it to be... And to the Adminis.watching...I know that this kind of stuff shouldn't go on here...but I lost his email...sorrry!--Greenwood1010 (talk) 15:14, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I need you to responed by 10:30 am today...if you don't I'll have the BOD declare me acting Pres...untill I hear from you...ok?--Greenwood1010 (talk) 15:20, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AccInsure? what is this? The Board of Directors voted and siad that "The AIA will not have any "homepage, group ceneter page or anythiing of that nature on Wikipedia" (Quote from BOD Member Charles L. I hope that AccInsure has nothing do do with AIA...does it?--Greenwood1010 (talk) 15:25, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As of right now it would be best to keep distance from the aia, i mean the wiki project should not have anyhting to do with Aia...the BOD doesn't want stuff like that. We are going to be an indepent group that is not part of wiki...i have to go...will send you more stuff on friday--Greenwood1010 (talk) 15:49, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Remember that the best use of Wikipedia userspace is things that are likely to make the encyclopedia better. While a certain amount of humor is part of Wikipedia, a game that is in no way related to improving the encyclopedia is likely to be deleted if it ever comes to a discussion at

Yes. Thanks. :-)
AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 19:23, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the birthday wishes. :) Anyway, I deleted Tony Spencer Hawk's user and talk pages because he was an indefinitely blocked user, and his user/talk pages had been in Category:Temporary Wikipedian userpages for some time, and pages listed in that category are deleted after a certain amount of time. Tony Spencer Hawk's user and talk pages were simply pages I came across in the category, not pages I had just decided to delete. Acalamari 21:21, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why apologize? You were just asking a question. :) Acalamari 22:39, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You say "Ignore what he says" this is personal attack!!!! And you accuses of me sockpuppetry elsewhere I wont say where it is un important!!!! Leave me in pieces. I dont know why you attacks me,BUT YOU WONT WIN. (Once you've read this, it might be an idea to quietly delete it...)
AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 23:25, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wait a second there, buddy, it was me. Mockery of another user. Sorry. No other words need be added (but call off the dogs, if, in a Mr Burns fashion, anyone has set them free). I promise never to do the same again (but weren't the 4 !!!! a give away?) AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 00:42, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"I will fight them to the end, they will not hijack, or distort, not twist. They will not raise their lies unchallenged. We humans are all equal. We all deserve the same chance, and if there are those that wish to say this is not so, I will stand eye to eye against them, and shoulder to shoulder with those that are with us. There is power in standing together, where ordinary people stand and say "No! That is not so!". But if humans are better than apes, it is because we are able to say that one thing is right and not another".
AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 01:04, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen on DIREKTOR's page you were looking for a translation. Here it is.

Dear engineer, we have to be patient: I integrated your text in 'Istrian exodus' but then the Slovene restored that previous version eliminating our contributions. Therefore I've added the (WIKI top banners about) neutrality and sources. Then the user:Ko'oy edited but with a similar version to yours. I suggest we spend some days discussing it on the appropriate page with the Slovene so we can understand his intention. We think that our versions are fine and we can restore them when we want but it is better to try dialogue and understanding now . You can read this message and those after in order to consider that troll or the vandals - unfortunately there are many!!!! LEO, 28 nov 2007

AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 01:56, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for you comment, what were you looking to have changed to your user page?, if I'm able to help I'll will. ▪◦▪≡ЅiREX≡^Talk 15:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know you might not mean any harm but the pic on

I don't see an error on your userpage so I don't know what you did, but most likely you broke the table, see Help:Table also I said earlier "the only pics not allowed on user pages as far as I know are copyrighted (without permission)/ fairuse pictures" I forgot to say illegal pictures. anyways I'll have to see the error in order to fix it.▪◦▪≡ЅiREX≡^Talk 01:41, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what comment you want pasted to Giove's page. Please drop it on your thread on my talk page and as long as it's not incivil or something (it's sure it's okay though), I'll drop it on his talk page. — Rlevse • Talk • 12:09, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PS, you should archive a bunch of this talk page-;) — Rlevse • Talk • 12:10, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it's been unprotected, prob better if you do the edit yourself now. — Rlevse • Talk • 15:12, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I told you in an email that I didn't want you to make a wikiproject page for aia. Why did you do it? Sadly you are removed from your postion...still a member however:)--Greenwood1010 15:41, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't be so sure, we'll still have to be on the lookout for his puppets. I don't think LEO's one of them, but I also don't think a "mere" ban will discourage Giove. I'd say we may have another User:Afrika paprika on our hands before long, the guy probably thinks this is all part of my GRAND MASTER PLAN, he's blaming me. --

I'm not Giovanni Giove, and it's becoming quite boring to be accused of that. 87.15.232.138 16:53, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1) The IP started reverting within 48 hours of Giovanni Giove's ban.

2) The IP's reverting the exact same articles Giovanni was interested in (in the same way).

3) Check out Giove's statement in his sockpuppet report (here: [1]):

"THIS IS MY IP: 84.221.67.196. (...)

talk) 14:38, 20 November 2007 (UTC)"[reply

]

There can be no doubt, the IP(s) IS Giovanni Giove, possibly using a proofreader (or somebody) to check his grammar. --

TALK) 20:26, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: I made a small correction on your userpage for you. :) ▪◦▪≡ЅiREX≡^Talk 02:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said, not even a community block stops this guy. A fanatic, plain and simple: Here he goes: [2] as IP 87.9.234.27 then [3] as IP 87.2.235.167 and here's a continuation of his obsessive "name of Zadar" edit-warring [4] and [5] as IP 87.2.63.34.

I've posted a sockpuppeteering report about Giovanni Giove's IPs, here:

]

Signpost updated for December 3rd, 2007.

Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 49	3 December 2007	About the Signpost

Signpost interview: New Executive Director Sue Gardner	Arbitration Committee elections: Elections open
Possible license migration sparks debate	Featured articles director names deputy
Software bug fixed, overuse of parser function curtailed	WikiWorld comic: "Wordplay"
News and notes: Wikipedian honored, fundraiser, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
WikiProject Report: LGBT studies	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Single-Page View	WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the

And if you want to clean up vandalism, I recommend you use

ed 02:56, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

The December 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot -- 11:21, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That would be fine with me. Shell ^babelfish 22:49, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

if you know somethings about horses, you may review my first article, The Syrian Arabian.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_Arabian

Wassail,

Eowyn --MurtaghxMisery 19:56, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussioni_utente:Giovanni_Giove/personale

AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 23:11, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He's preparing an appeal. Lots of "Alerted an administrator, but was blocked erroniously". "Obvious meat puppetry" "Took the second revert to the administrator, asking instructions", "falsely accused of..." "reverted an offensive edit..." bla bla bla.
Seems to have a hate on for Steel. Concluding comment is "Didn't even make a minimal effort at conciliation between the parties".AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 23:45, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Steady on, GP. The link you sent DIREKTOR was already there, just a few lines above... —Preceding unsigned comment added by AlasdairGreen27 (talk • contribs) 23:49, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I read the link. Quite simply, the guy's a fanatic. The worst part is I got restricted trying to stem the unending flow of biased edits eminating from the freak. :(

--

TALK) 17:03, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Please do not taunt other editors as you did here. This is unhelpful, and is considered disruptive. Thank you. — Coren ^(talk) 05:02, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When you want to enter a second RFA, you need to create a new page, and not just edit over the new one. ~Sasha Callahan _(Talk) 22:28, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like me to close your RfA as a

Anthøny 22:58, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

I split the second votes into a new page per

WP:RFA/N ~Sasha Callahan _(Talk) 23:27, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Is this good? <DREAMAFTER> ^<TALK> 23:34, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have you checked the RAW signature box? <DREAMAFTER> ^<TALK> 22:42, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You go to your My Preferences, see the "Signature:" box, where you can type? Put the code, everything in the edit box, into the typing space and check the RAW signature box, and click the "Save" button. <DREAMAFTER> ^<TALK> 21:55, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When you put it in, check the end of the code, and see if it is all there. <DREAMAFTER> ^<TALK> 22:10, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then you may have to remove the contribs link, or I can trim it down, and try to keep it similar. <DREAMAFTER> ^<TALK> 22:15, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Try it now. <DREAMAFTER> ^<TALK> 22:20, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now it should work. <DREAMAFTER> ^<TALK> 22:23, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How about now? <DREAMAFTER> ^<TALK> 22:59, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I may have missed something before, try it now. <DREAMAFTER> ^<TALK> 02:41, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the

Hey Gp, I thought I would give you an explanation why I reverted your edit to

gp, you undid an edit citing "does this dis the topic". I'm not sure I follow. Were you saying it's not relevent to the topic of bastardy laws when modern judges publicly espouse a prejudiced view against bastards?, or that the substance of the judges comments (verifiable) were so unconscionable that the only civil response is to pretend they were never said? Anyway, if you'd clarify, maybe I'd learn something ... Benjamin Gatti (talk) 13:51, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The wiki cup is a sort of world cup, for editing on wikipedia, you can join the next tournement. more info is here

]

Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.

Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 20	12 May 2008	About the Signpost

Explicit sexual content draws fire	Sighted revisions introduced on the German Wikipedia
Foundation receives copyright claim from church	Board to update privacy policy, adopts data retention policy
Update on Citizendium	Board candidacies open through May 22
Two wiki events held in San Francisco Bay Area	New feature enables users to bypass IP blocks
WikiWorld: "Tony Clifton"	News and notes: Autoconfirmed level, milestones
Wikipedia in the News	Dispatches: Changes at Featured lists
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Single-Page View	WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the

I swear Metros, like moths to the candle, you are just a magnet for this sort of thing. How do you manage it? ➪HiDrNick! 18:35, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, I apologize. It's not fair that you edited user spaces and Wikipedia spaces without getting blocked. Because of that, I have blocked you for one month. As for BoL, see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive133#Removing_topic_ban_on_Blow_of_Light. Metros (talk) 18:58, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, he's unbanned because "he got it". Well I got it too. I got the idea not to start useless projects or make an overly big deal about vandals too. I got the idea not to MYSPACE too. I got it already. I started all those pages for better organization, not for social heiarchy or MYSPACEing. I stayed away from Wikipedia-space editing. So tell me, what have I not gotten? Except for the UAA edits which Twinkle made. I've already proven I'm not useless. And

please note I do not disagree with the topic ban removal for BoL. --

You didn't quite "get it". You created adoption pages for people who haven't agreed to be adopted by you. Hell, with you being on a topic ban, should you even be adopting others? An adopter is supposed to be an example for the adopted user; I don't think having a topic ban is a good example. Your UAA report was clearly wrong; that's not even close to being promotional. So, no, you don't fully "get it" yet. Metros (talk) 20:53, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, maybe not the UAA thing, but I had explicitly stated permission from an administrator (see above thread) to create that page. AND, add that to the fact that I didn't know Hopiakuta's last edit was a half-month before I posted the thread. If I had known that, I wouldn't have created that page or the adoption directory in the first place. And from now on, I'll stay away from UAA because I violated not only community terms, but my own terms (which are to not do anything unless I know it's against username rules). That makes me doubly pissed, and having you pissed at me doesn't help. I've learned. --

^{REV LIMITER} 21:04, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Was the other administrator aware of your ban? Looking at

your conversation, there was no question of you as to whether it was okay for you to do it despite your ban. The only permission I see that you received was to copy parts of his subpages. You never said "hey, I know I have a topic ban but..." You never received permission to edit outside your topic ban. Metros (talk) 21:10, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

I honestly have no idea. But you still have to applaude me for having the responsibility to ask and make the fact that I was going to do it public instead of going behind your back to do it. I could've done that, but I didn't want to. --

^{REV LIMITER} 21:17, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Once again, I reiterate that the only thing you asked was to copy his adoption subpages. You never asked to adopt despite your ban. Stop applauding yourself for what you didn't do. Metros (talk) 21:19, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I didn't want to copy his subpages. I'd be a thief if I did that. --

Okay, but still, in no way did you ask to go around your topic ban. The way your question is worded appears to sinply be a general query about whether that's allowed (for any user) or a good idea (for any user). You never explicitly ask if you can go around your topic ban. Hersfold's response appears to have no knowledge of the topic ban within it. He clearly answered it as a general query and not a "can I go around the topic ban?" question. Metros (talk) 21:34, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At the time I thought Hersfold knew. But I was wrong. Can't I be accidentally wrong without getting blocked?

Your "accidents" occur too frequently. You "accidentally" report a user for a non-violation of policy to UAA. You "accidentally" adopt a user when the user hasn't accepted your adoption offer. When the user hasn't edited since a week before your offer. When another user offered adoption the previous day to the user. You "accidentally" assume that everyone knows about your topic ban and "accidentally" assert that you had explicit permission to break your topic ban. That's a lot of "accidents" here. Metros (talk) 21:49, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't "accidentally" report a user. I didn't "accidentally" adopt a user. I didn't "accidentally" assert anything. I don't do accidents. I do what I interperet as right and what I interperet as inside the rules. Which is what any human with any level of self-esteem would do. --

^{REV LIMITER} 21:57, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

okay, cool. If you keep editing outside the rules, then we have to keep you blocked. Your interpretations of what is inside the rules are clearly wrong and outside the rules. Therefore, we cannot risk you causing further headaches. Sorry the block stands. Metros (talk) 22:05, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(outdent) Metros, if I may ask, what is your rationale for this block, in the sense of how do you think it is going to benefit the encyclopedia? AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 22:11, 21 May 2008 (UTC) Scratch that. Not enough article edits to be worth defending.AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 22:47, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gp75, administrators aren't omniscient, not by far. I had no knowledge whatsoever about your topic ban, and without you expressly telling me, I had no reason to go digging through mountains of archives to go find out that you were banned, and not allowed to edit in the user space. I generally

a/c) 02:22, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

So that makes me scum. A frigging mistake makes me scum. --

^{REV LIMITER} 12:47, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

WP:AAU, User:Hopiakuta

• I've delisted gp75 from the Adopter's section because he no longer meets the
  criteria
  .
• as for Hopiakuta, I'm still not even sure what's going on with that one. he might not even desire adoption, for all we know - his userpage and talk page is a mish-mash of cut and pasted partially parsed code. since he's been inactive for nearly a month, and there's already a number of individuals who came forward to try and help him with whatever issues he seems to be having, I commented out the adoption requests, and removed the adoption offers.
• because of the foregoing, your topic ban, and the fact that Hopiakuta never accepted your offer, I would suggest you {{
  talk ¿ review ) 22:17, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The reason I didn't reply is because you're the one who has to decide all that. I don't care what you do. Metros (talk) 16:42, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But I'm stuck in a hole and would still like the community's opinion. --

^{REV LIMITER} 18:13, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The community doesn't decide when a person should retire. Only that person can. Metros (talk) 21:01, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And on a completely different topic, after my block is up, I'll need to upload an image of my U-Car per

WP:FACR

, as that's what I plan to get it to. It's my car, it was taken with my camera by my mom, and it's me in the car. So no copyright issues to worry about.

Another email sent, another email unanswered. Why? --

^{REV LIMITER} 13:26, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Because why the hell do I care that you sliced your finger? Additionally, you posted it on top of your user talk page. So I could have seen it there. There was also nothing to respond to: no question asked, no request of any kind. Metros (talk) 13:31, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because you could have acted humane and hoped I get well soon. That's why. --

^{REV LIMITER} 13:47, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

And when someone like Riana or Newyorkbrad gets hurt, three million people plague the user's page with cookies and "get well soon" cards. But peole like me, on the other hand, get things like "why the hell do I care?" Is there some reason the community treats some editors more humanly or something? --

^{REV LIMITER} 13:54, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

What'd you want? A card signed by everyone saying "We hope that you have a speedy recovery so that you can return soon as a non-productive editor who proves again and again why he is on a topic ban"? The reason you're not getting piles upon piles of "get well soon" notices is that you haven't earned the respect of other users. Metros (talk) 14:07, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You do realize that your next block is going to be fairly long, right? Probably in the 3-6 months to a year to possibly indefinite range. So when that block expires, you better become a productive user who doesn't have all these "accidents" and "mistakes" that you keep experiencing. Metros (talk) 14:32, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GP, can you possibly explain what you are hoping to accomplish here? Prior to your topic ban, your sole purpose was to give an obvious troll the attention he wanted. Since then, instead of contributing to the encyclopedia, you have gone out of your way to get blocked. You've pushed the limits of your topic ban and played the victim time and time again. I've even defended you... foolishly. Enough. Stop begging for attention and contribute. If you don't want to contribute, retire or get banned. Simple. AniMate 15:00, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want the respect of the community at large, earn it. People like Riana and Newyorkbrad have dedicated themselves to working on many, many different areas of the project (as well as working across some of the other WMF projects), and as such, people have respect for them. EVula // talk // ☯ // 15:22, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Again, Metros, all I want is for this god-damned shame of a non-supportive community to stop treating me and others like me as a user and start treating me as a human. You, for exaple, haven't tried to help me, and instead treated me as a broken bot. Here's an idea: why don't you do your administrative duty and HELP users in need? --

^{REV LIMITER} 16:03, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The "duty" of an administrator is to protect the encyclopedia from damage. Dozens have tried to help you, but you resist help and just cause further damage. So if that requires you being blocked to prevent further damage, then that's what needs to be done. Metros (talk) 16:10, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gp - use the time of your block to get away from Wikipedia and find another interim hobby. No one, Metros or anyone else, is responsible for helping you conform to policy. It your responsibility, and no one elses, to prove to the community that you can be a constructive member. So far, at least in the eyes of a number of people, you haven't done that. No one is attacking you for who you are or anything like that - you have been criticized, restricted and blocked solely because of your failure to demonstrate that you can valuably contribute without causing disruption.

^T 16:11, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

The community is very supportive of the members that are productive and contribute to both the community and the project; see again the examples of Riana or Newyorkbrad. However, of your positive contributions, most of them are negated by the amount of drama that is usually entailed. Put your nose to the grindstone at work (within the bounds of your topic ban) and people will respect you more. That's the only recipe for this ending well. EVula // talk // ☯ // 16:18, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Metros, I don't know how the hell you earned the trust of the community, but apparently that trust is wrong. No one is safe on your watch. --

^{REV LIMITER} 16:19, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

I will ask you to refrain from making personal attacks, in light of the comment above. Commenting in that manner will lead to an extended block. It's almost as if this thread was created to disrupt the community further. Rudget (Help?) 16:33, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also note I'm being stalked across multiple wikis by my school IP (68.248.232.211). this is why I need someone to change my name. --

^{REV LIMITER} 16:48, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Oh, here's a bit more fun, via YouTube: [6]

talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile

}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks. This is much needed. :) --

^{REV LIMITER} 15:54, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Don't worry, your english is fine. :D --

^{REV LIMITER} 16:11, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

It is easier for me to speak Portuguese, Spanish or Maltese. English is my fourth language. It is easier for me to speak it than to write it. So what's with this injury? Sounds pretty nasty.

talk) 16:25, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

I was working on a shop class project when the line I was cutting suddenly veered off-course. My small finger hit the moving blade. --

^{REV LIMITER} 16:30, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Yeah, it hurt. And you can help me by guiding me through the deeper aspects of artcle editing etc. I've only got ~375 mainpace edits.--

^{REV LIMITER} 16:52, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Now, I don’t know anything about your editing or your approach to Wikipedia articles. If you have the time and interest, you can do me a big favor. My pal Magnewatan is trying to clean up an article. It is over here: [7]. If you’d like to work with us, here is what you can do: copy the article off Wikipedia, save it as a Word document. Edit it as you believe it needs to be edited. Then e-mail your Word document to me. Let me look at it, and I can report back. How does that sound?

Thanks!

]

Signpost updated for May 19th and 26th, 2008.

Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 21	19 May 2008	About the Signpost

Pro-Israeli group's lobbying gets press, arbitration case	Board elections: Voting information, new candidates
Sister Projects Interview: Wikibooks	WikiWorld: "Hodag"
News and notes: Russian passes Swedish, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Dispatches: Good article milestone	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 22	26 May 2008	About the Signpost

Board elections: Candidate questions	Single User Login opt-in for all users
Community-related news sources grow	WikiWorld: "Tomcat and Bobcat"
News and notes: Wikimedia DE lawsuit, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Dispatches: Featured sounds	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Single-Page View	WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the

I'm quite sorry you hurt your hand and I'm sorry that someone from your school is harassing you. Neither of these things, however, have anything to do with your current block. You seem to desperately want someone (mostly Metros) to help you. He has. You were an unproductive contributor focused solely on one vandal. So Metros and the community gave you and Blow of Light some strict guidelines to help you edit productively. BoL (for the most part) followed the guidelines set out for him and is free from editing restrictions. You are not. You seem extremely uninterested in actually editing the encyclopedia. In fact, of your 1900 or so edits, only 311 are actual edits to articles. Now, you should know, I'm giving you this advice because I want to. It's not my job to guide you anymore than it is Metros'. That's something you seem very confused about. While some administrators are natural nurturers, it isn't a requirement. They have a mop (in the form of extra buttons) to help clean up and protect the encyclopedia. They are not your teachers, they are not guidance counselors, they are not mentors. If that's what you want, I'm sure any of the people watching this page would be happy to put you

Still, all of this begs the question: Why are you here? Looking over your history, it seems to be that you enjoy the dramatic, community aspects of Wikipedia but don't really care for contributing to the mainspace. That's problematic, as your contributions to the "meta" side of things aren't helpful either. So, why are you here? And, what do you want?

Personally, it looks to me like you're after acceptance by the Wikipedia community. That only comes from meaningful mainspace contributions or insightful contributions to the meta/policy side of things. If I'm right about your motivations, and I suspect that I am, can I suggest that another venue might be appropriate for the kind of interactions you're looking for. Here's a

I'm not telling you to retire or anything, but I do think these options might be better if what you're really looking for is simply community acceptance and personal interaction. These are just my opinions/late night thoughts. I'd consider listening, as something here has to change. AniMate 08:58, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, something is going to change. Let's try to harness some of that energy and enthusiasm into a worthwhile project? Which leads us to our next topic for GP75...

I still really want you to think about what I've said. Article writing and copyediting haven't been things you've been very keen on in the past, and there are other virtual communities out there where you might find the types of interactions you seem to be looking for. AniMate 11:52, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Listen, I have a friend who is a movie actress and a former

Oh, how is the hand doing?

Uh, okay. I'll see what I can do. --

^{REV LIMITER} 11:40, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Sure. --

^{REV LIMITER} 10:24, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Great. Now we have something to look forward to! Oh, heads up: I got three Did You Know? notices over a four-day period (May 30-June 2). I was a bit happy and wanted to share the news. :-) When you're active again, let's make an effort to go after the Did You Know? competition.

talk) 12:24, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Sounds good! --

^{REV LIMITER} 16:22, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

My hand's healing well. I'm having the stitches taken out Thursday. --

^{REV LIMITER} 17:45, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Hey is this your creation: [8]? Because if it is, you could be a fine writer. I enjoyed this a lot – excellent work! Really, I’ve not been this surprised since I caught Fred Flintstone smoking cigarettes: [9].

Yep. Suprisingly it's not really my favorite work. My favorite is this. --

^{REV LIMITER} 19:20, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

This is good stuff! Do you want to be a writer? You have the tools to pursue it, if you wanted to.

talk) 00:17, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Yeah, I'm currently writing my first book. --

^{REV LIMITER} 00:45, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks. I'm working on it when I can. --

^{REV LIMITER} 10:35, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

BoL (Talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

BoL (Talk) 02:03, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. :) --

^{REV LIMITER} 10:36, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Sounds like an excellent idea! Going there now. --

^{REV LIMITER} 16:19, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

It is. --

^{REV LIMITER} 18:12, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Check your email (if you haven't already) and let me know what you think. 19:12, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry-I was busy. Will check it this evening. --

^{REV LIMITER} 10:37, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Feeling pretty good, actually. --

^{REV LIMITER} 16:18, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Signpost updated for June 2, 2008.

Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 23	2 June 2008	About the Signpost

Board elections open	WikiWorld: "Facial Hair"
Wikipedia in the News	Dispatches: Style guide and policy changes
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Single-Page View	WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the