User talk:ZestyLemonz

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Miscellany for deletion notices. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 23:05, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Miscellany for deletion notices. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. -- Whpq (talk) 11:36, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Miscellany for deletion notices, you may be blocked from editing. - Whpq (talk) 12:20, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ZestyLemonz. You have new messages at Whpq's talk page.
Message added 17:25, 12 April 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Whpq (talk) 17:25, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ZestyLemonz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I've been told by User:Yamla Until I get this account unblocked, there isn't a chance of me editing, yes I've been involved in edit wars but I've never continuously vandalised maliciously. I'm a good wikipedian, hence why I've made so many other accounts, but I'll admit I did get set in my ways and I did get in edit wars when pages were changed. However I'm willing to follow the rules, and if all my other accounts need to be deleted, I'd be willing to just use this one.

Decline reason:

The issue is when you are blocked, you are not allowed to make ANY edits, even if they are constructive. Blocked means just that, you're blocked from editing. If you're intent on being a contributor to Wikipedia, consider the

standard offer, where you walk away from editing Wikipedia for 6 months period. No IP edits, no block evasion, no "constructive edits". Do that, come back six months from now and request an unblock. That will go a long way to show you're serious about working constructively on Wikipedia RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:33, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To the reviewing admin, note this user engaged in extensive block evasion as late as yesterday. I've indicated

Yes and I do apologise, however I was making constructive edits on a page that needed editing. But like you said until this account and my IP address (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2A02:C7D:8AA4:5600:0:0:0:0/64) is unblocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ZestyLemonz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I need to edit Coach Trip as it never gets done and

Coach Trip (series 16)

a mess. I am a constructive editor and I NEED to be unblocked. How I can do this ASAP so I can get back to editing Coach Trip.

Decline reason:

You, the person behind this account, and all the other accounts and IP addresses you've used, are not allowed to edit. The best you can hope for is to successfully apply for the

standard offer after six months of no socking or block evasion. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:45, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note that this user has engaged in block evasion within the past 24 hours. They've previously been pointed at

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ZestyLemonz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I need to edit Coach Trip as it never gets done and

Coach Trip (series 16)

a mess. I am a constructive editor and I NEED to be unblocked. How I can do this ASAP so I can get back to editing Coach Trip.

Decline reason:

You, the person behind this account, and all the other accounts...oh, forget it. I'll assume you know how to read. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 16:56, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

For continued abuse, Bbb23 has revoked this user's talk page access. If the currently open unblock request is declined, that leaves

User has engaged in block evasion as of August 2017. --Yamla (talk) 17:21, 3 August 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

ZestyLemonz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #19097 was submitted on Aug 28, 2017 12:00:00. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 12:00, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User has engaged in block evasion as of late September, 2017. --Yamla (talk) 23:41, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User has engaged in block evasion as of October, 2017. User regularly lies about block evasion. --Yamla (talk) 14:05, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User has engaged in block evasion as of November, 2017. --Yamla (talk) 12:17, 15 November 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

ZestyLemonz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #19852 was submitted on Nov 25, 2017 00:36:38. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 00:36, 25 November 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

ZestyLemonz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #20317 was submitted on Jan 13, 2018 18:25:15. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 18:25, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User is permitted to request an unblock no sooner than 11 July, 2018. If this user requests an unblock sooner than that, they may be banned from

Copied from User talk:2A02:C7D:8AA4:5600:DB6:C5BA:4D3F:9EC9: Right so, if my CONSTRUCTIVE contributions are going to be reverted (I thought you could edit via IP address if you don’t have an account), then I’m applying for the standard offer. So I’ll be back in July. @Yamla: could you actually explain the standard offer and what I have to do SPECIFICALLY and not leave a saracastic comment. Thanks.

And if I am inactive until July is the Standard Offer GUARANTEED.

2A02:C7D:8AA4:5600:DB6:C5BA:4D3F:9EC9 (talk) 01:51, 17 January 2018 (UTC) User:ZestyLemonz[reply]

I will copy this response over to User talk:ZestyLemonz. All the details of the standard offer are given at

WP:SO. Even then, there's a good chance you may be required to go through {{2nd chance}} and may be subject to a topic ban. But again, I want to be clear, this is your only way forward. Reminder: your edit here has reset the six month timer. You are now not eligible to apply before 2018-07-17. --Yamla (talk) 11:40, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

I'll also note that you do have an account. You know perfectly well, because you've been told many, many times, that you aren't permitted to edit while that account is blocked.

WP:BLOCK is very clear on this. You can't claim you thought you could edit via an IP address if you didn't have an account, because you have an account. --Yamla (talk) 11:54, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

User has engaged in block evasion as of 2018-01-28. See 90.204.47.61 (talk · contribs). --Yamla (talk) 13:04, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User has engaged in block evasion as of February, 2018. --Yamla (talk) 14:59, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am considering moving for your formal

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 21:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The link is WP:CBAN for ZestyLemonz. --Yamla (talk) 21:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are banned under

User has engaged in ban evasion as of 2018-04. --Yamla (talk) 13:57, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User has engaged in ban evasion as of 2018-06. --Yamla (talk) 11:29, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User has engaged in ban evasion as of 2018-10. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:33, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And in March, 2019. --Yamla (talk) 20:40, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And July, 2019. --Yamla (talk) 21:08, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Basically, there's no month when this banned user doesn't evade their block. But for the record, they evaded their ban in August, 2019. --Yamla (talk) 14:32, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And April, 2020. --Yamla (talk) 10:42, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #46761 is closed. User UTRS banned till February 13, 2022. Noting Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ZestyLemonz/Archive#08 August 2021 Noting global lock. Noting user's poor attitude. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:34, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]