Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Vote/Aranda56

This candidate has withdrawn from the race; please do not vote. This page is kept primarily for historical reasons. Thank you!

Sorry for the late entry into this race but I think it's a must. Hello all my name is Jorge and I have been a Wikipedian since early August and I am attempt to run for arb-com. I felt recenly that the arb-com takes too long to make a decistion. If I get elected to the arb-com I would try to make desistions that are best for Wikipedia and to look at each case very closely in my own view. Thanks --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 22:42, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Questions

I withdraw, --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 00:32, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I am noticing a big pileon something don't want, so please someone close the voting on it. Thanks --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 01:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1. Oppose, lack of experience. See my voting rationale. Talrias (t | e | c) 00:02, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
2. Oppose. Mo0[talk] 00:03, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
3. Fair use policy 00:04, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply
   ]
4. I wanted to withdraw so I'm opposing myself --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 00:05, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
5. —Kirill Lokshin 00:09, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
6. Michael Snow 00:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
7. Even the nominator is opposing, so Oppose. Batmanand 00:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
8. Oppose - Inexperience -Mackensen (talk) 00:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
9. Oppose only because he wants to withdraw. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 00:16, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
10. Oppose, and think harder next time before putting yourself up for elections. Madame Sosostris 00:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
11. Oppose. There's no way to just withdraw? —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 00:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
12. Oppose--ragesoss 00:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
13. Oppose. Nice user. But the many times the user applied for administrator (in frequent sucession) as well as postponing/withdrawing twice the last nomination (admittedly related to health problems, but which seems to have correlation with the success of the nomination) makes me think that the user is not mature enough. Next time. :) Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 00:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
14. Oppose inexperience. David | explanation | Talk 00:32, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    Note: The following votes were added after the candidate withdrew his candidacy.

15. Oppose not experienced. --Angelo 00:36, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
16. Cryptic (talk) 00:38, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
17. Oppose --
    Ptalk29 / ^Pcontribs29 00:42, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply
    ]
18. Oppose, inexperience. Carbonite | Talk 00:45, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
19. He wants to withdraw, so... Neutrality^talk 00:47, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
20. Per Neutrality. Ambi 00:59, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
21. Oppose. Changed from support, as he wants to withdraw. --GraemeL ^(talk) 01:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
22. Oppose --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 01:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]