Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fate of the Lhapa (soundtrack)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete for lack of notability. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:29, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fate of the Lhapa (soundtrack)

Fate of the Lhapa (soundtrack) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet

WP:NALBUMS. AllMusic is not a source for notability, and no one else has reviewed it. It has not won a major award, gotten any substantial coverage, etc., and it really doesn't need to be redirected - we don't have an article on the documentary. MSJapan (talk) 19:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Discussion about other related
WP:WALLEDGARDEN
articles and COI (recommend !voters to read it)
  • Comment: "Plan"
Originally I had said, at the
Belarca Records
would be viable as stand-alone article, however, this may be sufficient independent reliable sources on their CDs for such article:
So the article could be somewhat like this: its lead section about the label's founder and the Naxos distribution;
Also the formerly deleted Francesco Di Fiore may redirect here
Other titles can be made into redirects to this section too.
(sorry for the unusual presentation of this plan: I created this reply on a separate page in my userspace in order to post it as a template on several AfDs concurrently) --Francis Schonken (talk) 08:15, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • The problem with this, if I have understood you correctly, is that Belarca Records is not a notable label and currently redirects to
    Naxos Records. Finally, small labels like this draw their notability from the notability of the artists and ensembles who record for them. If none of them are independently notable, then neither is the label. In my view, this is not helpful. The decision should be made on each of the artist/ensemble articles separately. This kind of transclusion of a sub-discussion also causes a potential mess in AfDs. Voceditenore (talk) 09:16, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 02:36, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 02:36, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.