Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hasan Fuat Sari (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:00, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hasan Fuat Sari

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think he meets

WP:ARTIST. Nothing in google news, and limited hits in google books. Some of the sources merely confirm he has work exhibited or won minor awards. LibStar (talk) 22:28, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Finland, and Turkey. LibStar (talk) 22:28, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there isn't any significant coverage and no indication of passing the notability criteria. It was created in 2017 by a user named Ogtumer, who only has 3 edits and all were on this article. Several months after its creation, this entry was edited by an account named HFSari, who was most likely the subject himself. So, there is COI and also possible PROMO. Aintabli (talk) 00:29, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Sources already in the article enough for GNG. Public sculptures displayed in Finland's largest urban area park is a significant work. I didn't see anything promotional in the article text. Ben Azura (talk) 21:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:13, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, if we are to trust Finnish media, he's notable, and the page meets GNG. Randy Kryn (talk) 23:42, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment below refutes your point on Finnish coverage. LibStar (talk) 05:26, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment For the benefit of those unable to read Finnish, the Finnish language sourcing is not very solid. Refs 1, 2 and 10 are non-independent and 8 is a bog-standard event advertisement. Ref 20 is merely a name in a list, and also incidentally non-independent. I can't seem to access 11 and 16-19, but based on the titles I'm suspicious that at least 16-18 are passing mentions and would discount them unless someone can describe the content in some detail. Based on what I've seen ref #6 is the only Finnish language source I'm confident actually contributes towards GNG. -Ljleppan (talk) 08:38, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:11, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 03:58, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The public sculptures in the Kupittaa Park's playground mentioned above by User:Ben Azura were part of a community art project led by other people and were apparently demolished in 2013.[1][2] Being part of such a project is not a strong evidence of notability. And if the sculptures are to be used in establishing his notability, we need to know more about his contribution to the project, e.g. what were the individual works by him? (I don't have access to Turun päivälehti ref, so I don't know what that says) Jähmefyysikko (talk) 09:15, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As explained by Ljleppan above, there is currently only one ref supporting his notability. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 09:18, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dellete. Does not have the sources and coverage to support
WP:ARTIST. Elspea756 (talk) 00:03, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.