Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jérémy Amelin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per the uncontested claims of notability. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:10, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jérémy_Amelin

Jérémy_Amelin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• Missing high quality secondary sources. Doesn't meet notability standards. Promo. Articles for deletion. TheSpectra (talk) 12:40, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Automated comment: This AfD cannot be processed correctly because of an issue with the header. Please make sure the header has only 1 article, and doesn't have any HTML encoded characters.—
  Talk to my owner:Online 12:46, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly
  Talk to my owner:Online 13:02, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Comment. This appears to be the nominator's first edit. See TheSpectra (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log). While the nomination is signed by TheSpectra, it was submitted by 2a01:e35:8be2:6d00:91ba:57f4:a79e:3b3a (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:21, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. This AfD was formatted incorrectly, so I fixed it. My first reaction is that the subject looks notable. 2a01:e35:8be2:6d00:91ba:57f4:a79e:3b3a (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log), who submitted this nomination, has also submitted one for the corresponding French article, fr:Jérémy Amelin Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:21, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. The result of the French AfD, closed on october 17, 2014, was no consensus: meets the notability guidelines and is sourced for the keep !votes, sources are not good for the delete !votes. Regards, Comte0 (talk) 20:42, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:06, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:06, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:06, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:06, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:06, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Sources from
  WP:GNG. Regards, Comte0 (talk) 01:52, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep as passes criteria 1 of
  WP:NMUSIC with significant coverage in reliable sources as shown above and also passes criteria 2 with a release charting on two national charts so the article deserves to be kept imv, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:28, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.