Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mallikarjun Bande

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 05:12, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mallikarjun Bande

Mallikarjun Bande (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I know he is deceased but

WP:BLP1E applies here. No significant coverage, and nothing about anything other than his death. GiantSnowman 20:27, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Keep

Reasons being IGP to whom the PSI was reporting has been transferred from

Gulbarga
due to public outrage and demand from the deceased's wife. At this moment yes there are no enough points to put on his life , but going forward as and when the enquiry gets started new information may come out.

Also if required page name can be renamed to "Death of mallikarjun bande". But i personally feel that page should not be deleted. [[User:|Prajwalkumarmn]] (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:58, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep

Bande was a brave cop who died in the fierce encounter with Munna, a sharp shooter and active criminal with alleged nexus with underworld. Also, bande was credited for his crack down on rowdy sheeters for which it is reported that he was transferred to Crime Branch. His death has now sparked intense Socio-political and security debate in Karnataka. Government of Karnataka has even ordered for a thorough investigation into his death by the CID. Who Knows?? the outcome might act as a new milestone for future police reforms in India.-- ~ Irrigator talk 05:07, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:44, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:44, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, good deal of source coverage on this deceased individual. — Cirt (talk) 07:48, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep coverage, sources. alot of notability indications.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:43, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.