Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RJ Dheena

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 20:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RJ Dheena

RJ Dheena (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:BLP1E, is not enough to achieve notability. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints|Mistakes) 00:26, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:42, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There are coverage which discussed him before he broke the record and after(click "next") in multiple mainstream reliable sources. There are also quite a few independent coverage (from world record) of him, like this one.
One should notice that the time-frame within which he was covered by multiple reliable sources spans for a decade. Additionally, these are only English-language sources; his coverage should be at least double in number in Tamil language (language of the region he belongs to).
Anup [Talk] 04:16, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 (talkcontribs) 00:30, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:26, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Radio personality as a compromise. Other than the records, there is not a lot of information available about the subject in sources (e.g. [1], [2]). The Radio personality article presently has no mentions of the Limca Book of Records or Guinness World Records, so a merge will improve that article. North America1000 16:50, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep and try to expand, but merge is a poor choice here. It's like merging minor authors to the general page of "author" It is of almost no actual use. ```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by DGG (talkcontribs) 23:51, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
We can merge some author who holds the record for writing the longest book ever and if that's the only notable thing he has done or a painter who has painted the longest canvas painting and so on.... "Try to expand" is actually of almost no use because all the trivia about him can be added. I can listen to his radio show someday and mention in his article that he admires singers like Lata Mangeshkar, Balamuralikrishna and so on... We can "expand" by writing his views which he expressed on his show about flood relief activities in Chennai or how truck regulations should be made strict so they don't run over people and so on.... §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:37, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.