Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 1

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Log
< January 31
February 2 >

February 1

Category:Stand-up comedy concert films

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 9#Category:Stand-up comedy concert films

Category:Companies based in Poulton-le-Fylde

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 23:42, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Merge to larger parent category as the category only has 1 entry. LibStar (talk) 23:44, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Queer actresses by nationality

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 23:42, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's only one nationality in here, which isn't helpful for navigation Mason (talk) 22:59, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:Athletic Club football teams and seasons

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 03:20, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: delete, the category mainly consists of entries merely bearing the name Athletic Club, and for other entries it is entirely unclear why they are in this category. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:32, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:19th-century Roman Catholic bishops in the Papal States

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 9#Category:19th-century Roman Catholic bishops in the Papal States

Category:South Bend Athletic Association football seasons

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 23:35, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only 1 page in category. Let'srun (talk) 02:34, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support in principle, but not delete. @Let'srun for tiny categories like this that are too small at the moment, a merge target is important so that the page isn't isolated from the tree. Do you have a suggested merge? Mason (talk) 23:02, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 21:47, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Lawyers from the Colony of New South Wales

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Triple merge * Pppery * it has begun... 23:35, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Dual merge, non-defining intersection between colony location, occupation, and century. I also think it is worth noting that for the VAST majority of people, being from the Colony of New South Wales is not defining. Same logic as Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_November_17#Category:Writers_from_the_Colony_of_Western_Australia Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_January_7#Category:Engineers_from_the_Colony_of_New_South_Wales Mason (talk) 05:14, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 21:47, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Triple merge per Marcocapelle, and precedent discussions. The intersection between the past political status of NSW and occupation seems irrelevant to these individuals' biographies, as presumably a scientist or businesspeople goes on with the same occupation when the political status changes. Place Clichy (talk) 09:58, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Humor and wit characters

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 9#Category:Humor and wit characters

Category:BBC Daytime television series

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename Uncontested for two weeks, could have been speedy renamed per C2A. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:35, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: 'BBC Daytime' isn't an official name: [1] Fuddle. Similar to Category:Late night television programming. (talk) 05:43, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 21:46, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional characters involved in incest

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus.
(non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 23:43, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: The "involved in" is a dead giveaway that this isn't defining for a character, just an aspect of the story itself. Therefore it clearly fails
WP:NONDEF. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 23:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Support per nom Mason (talk) 01:24, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose "just an aspect of the story itself" Incomprehensible. The story is what tells us about the life events of a character. Dimadick (talk) 01:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Something outside of the character that happens to them is not the same thing as an intrinsic trait of the character that would be defining for them. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:17, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Dimadick AHI-3000 (talk) 20:53, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 18:46, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 21:46, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Finno-Ugric peoples

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus.
WP:NPASR applies. ✗plicit 00:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: The terms Finno-Ugric and Uralic are often used interchangeably[2] and it is often unclear whether to classify pages under 'Uralic' or 'Finno-Ugric' (example) The subcategories of Uralic peoples should also mimic the structure of the template Template:Finno-Ugric peoples. Compare also with Category:Uralic languages, which is in a better shape. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 16:22, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 19:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 21:46, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional bibliophiles

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep.
(non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 03:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: This would appear to be your standard
WP:SUBJECTIVECAT as it is unclear what would qualify a fictional character to be a bibliophile, or what would make them defined by that trait. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 08:30, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Delete, a rather trivial characteristic. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:10, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, a lot of the entries seem to surpisingly fit, with Belle (Disney character), Twilight Sparkle and Hermione Granger all having a strong fascination with reading that defines their characters. Presuming the category is well maintained, that seems to be more objective of a category for fictional characters.
  • Keep "surpisingly fit" Not that surprising, since this is an entire type of characters, and not than rare either. In Twilight Sparkle's case, she spent part of her series living in a library and was the closest thing to a librarian which the main setting had. She did not just read books, she offered or lend books to other characters. Dimadick (talk) 02:06, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 19:59, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 21:45, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional travelers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus.
WP:NPASR applies. ✗plicit 00:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: The vagueness of this category makes it a
WP:SUBJECTIVECAT. Being a traveler in general is not a defining aspect of a character, whereas the subcategories arguably are defining, as they depict specific types of traveler, that aren't subjective in nature. Of course, the individual articles in the category would be purged. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 08:23, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 19:59, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I agree that it is confusing and vague, but we have the non-fictional version as well, which I think has the same problems. Mason (talk) 00:02, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 21:45, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Dimensional travelers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus.
WP:NPASR applies. ✗plicit 00:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: Only the first category encompasses actual dimensional travelers. The others have members that are not necessarily defined by being a dimensional traveler, though they may have engaged in it. Therefore, the category is redundant, as well as potentially confusing due to its lack of "fictional". ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:20, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: See also #Category:Fictional travelers below.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 20:00, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 21:45, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Churches in the United Kingdom by century, 7th-17th century

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus.
(non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 03:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: The United Kingdom didn't exist as these predate the Acts of Union 1707. As they were separate countries, churches by century categories for each nation should be in corresponding century and country category. Suonii180 (talk) 02:01, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 20:05, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per nom. That said, I also like the alternative by Aiden: rename them to "YY-century churches in Great Britain" per Aiden's suggestion. Omnis Scientia (talk) 20:56, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Keep Nonsense proposal - no modern country except perhaps Egypt existed 2,000 years ago, yet we have dozens if not hundreds of categories for Roman/Greek/Indian buildings by modern country. If the cats said "of" rather than "in" there might be the glimmering of a case, but they don't. Or has this proposal been very badly explained? The main stated grounds make no sense at all. Johnbod (talk) 04:51, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    U still around? I think you are one of the better editors on WP so I am surprised you are sticking it out! And I agree with you on this one. 121.98.204.148 (talk) 23:23, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep and speedy close. The nom does not see the difference in "in" and "of" ("or constructed in"). 23:27, 25 January 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.98.204.148 (talk)
  • Keep. Believe it or not, there are 16th-century churches in the United Kingdom. Today. Place Clichy (talk) 14:13, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 21:42, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another completely unnecessary rollover by User:Qwerfjkl! This is a clear Keep. Johnbod (talk) 18:16, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Johnbod, This is not a clear keep, or I would have closed it as such. It may still end as keep, but it is by no means clear, which is why I relisted it. Qwerfjkltalk 19:40, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User:Qwerfjkl, it is clear there is no consensus (with keep votes the most numerous), so it defaults to keep. Johnbod (talk) 02:04, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@
!votes, so I don't count them. Qwerfjkltalk 07:05, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Hafez al-Assad

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep.
(non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 23:38, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominators rationale: As per the
WP:C2D. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cactinites (talk • contribs
)
  • @Cactinites: the article has been moved three months ago without RM, so the usage of C2D as the main argument is questionable. It requires more substantive arguments. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:00, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Inconsistent even within the main article. It seems that the article move was probably motivated by an interpretation of Arabic-to-English transcription rather than common English usage. Place Clichy (talk) 18:17, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 20:25, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • I have submitted a technical move request to move the article back. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:30, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 21:40, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • This nomination is moot since the article is now back at its original title. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:48, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I support a procedural speedy close, per lack of rationale. Place Clichy (talk) 10:00, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep/close, Another completely unnecessary rollover by User:Qwerfjkl! Johnbod (talk) 18:17, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ukrainian territories claimed by Russia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 23:38, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale:
WP:NONDEFINING, Russian officials have laid claim to various areas in Ukraine, with some claiming the entirety of Ukraine. Yorkporter (talk) 21:32, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Swedish migration to North America

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 23:38, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: better fits the content, as well as sibling categories. Besides the emigrants children categories (which can be reparented), these categories are in fact not just about migration but also diaspora including subsequent generations, their culture etc. Place Clichy (talk) 20:24, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Female soldiers

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 9#Category:Female soldiers

Category:Railway stations in Weston-super-Mare

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 23:48, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This is the official name for the subdivision it belongs to, so I believe this is a more fitting name — Preceding unsigned comment added by Class444SWRail (talk • contribs) 18:13, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Railway stations in Bath, Somerset

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 23:47, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This is the official name for the subdivision, so I believe the category name for it should be reflective. Class444SWRail (talk) 14:15, 2 February 2024 (UTC) Class444SWRail[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Railway stations in Bristol, Bath and South Gloucestershire

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 23:47, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This is the official name for the subdivision, so I believe the category name for it should be reflective. Class444SWRail (talk) 14:15, 2 February 2024 (UTC) Class444SWRail[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:History of the United States by ethnic group

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 23:47, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: better fits the actual content, and homogeneous with siblings e.g. History of ethnic groups in Poland, History of ethnic groups in Russia etc. Place Clichy (talk) 17:12, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Unorganized territory of the United States

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 23:47, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale:
WP:OVERLAPCAT, unuseful duplicate of long-standing Category:United States Minor Outlying Islands. Current content is 9 articles for islands all already in the former category: Baker Island, Howland Island, Jarvis Island, Johnston Atoll, Kingman Reef, Midway Atoll, Navassa Island, Palmyra Atoll, Wake Island. They are sometimes in a child category, hence deletion is better than merger. Place Clichy (talk) 15:31, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wives of Rupert Murdoch

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 9#Category:Wives of Rupert Murdoch

Category:QAnon

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: purge.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 16:05, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: We seem to have a mix of biographical and non-biographical articles here, which fails
WP:COPSEP. --woodensuperman 12:31, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Paleoconservatism

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: purge.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 16:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: We seem to have a mix of biographical and non-biographical articles here, which fails
WP:COPSEP --woodensuperman 12:30, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Right-wing populism in the United States

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: purge.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 16:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: We seem to have a mix of biographical and non-biographical articles here, which fails
WP:COPSEP. --woodensuperman 12:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Translators of Ray Bradbury

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 9#Category:Translators of Ray Bradbury

Category:Translators of Agatha Christie

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 9#Category:Translators of Agatha Christie

Category:Floristry by country

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 23:36, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only one category in here, which is unhelpful for navigation. Delete instead of merge because the child category is already in the proper categories. Mason (talk) 06:13, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Lists of flower festivals

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 23:36, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's only one page in here, which isn't helpful for navigation Mason (talk) 05:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge for now, without objection to recreate the category when some more articles are available. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:41, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Greek mythology of Illyria

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Rather than drag this CfD out for another week, I would ask that interested editors take the discussion of whether
(non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: Not really sure that a distinction needs to be made here. Other parent category is Category:Greek mythology by region Mason (talk) 05:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just delete, the article is already in Category:Characters in Greek mythology and does not belong in (non-Greek) Category:Illyrian mythology. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:29, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Support merge: The characters maybe in Greek mythology but Illyrian is a separate culture and civilization itself. For example, there are many deities that span multiple religions and civilizations, and it would not be objective to claim they're proprietary to just one and not another. If the two nominated Categories each had extensive entries I would have recommended keeping the two separate, since what the Ancient Greeks claimed of Illyria and what Illyrians claimed of themselves (or what modern research attributes to Illyrians) are two distinct scopes of topics. DA1 (talk) 09:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Marcocapelle. We're just talking about article Illyrius here. This character is presently absent from topic articles Illyrian religion and Paleo-Balkan mythology, and seems to be an eponymous ancestor assumed by the Greeks and Romans for the Illyrians rather than a deity worshiped by this non-Greek people. Place Clichy (talk) 15:59, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Films directed by Ray Smallwood

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge but trout nominator for emptying a category out-of-process.
(non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 00:13, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: These refer to the same director. Goustien (talk) 04:55, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Iowa Wesleyan Tigers football seasons

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 8#Category:Iowa Wesleyan Tigers football seasons

Category:Pennsylvania lobbyists

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to
(non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 23:44, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: Dual merge. We don't need to diffuse lobbyists by their state. Mason (talk) 04:41, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:1910s business films

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 9#Category:1910s business films

Category:1910 government budgets

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 9#Category:1910 government budgets

Category:Sober people

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 23:35, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I have doubts as to whether this is a
defining category for individuals. Additionally, when I spot-checked several of the individuals for whom this category has been applied, I didn't see anything stating that those individuals are currently sober. DonIago (talk) 03:49, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Delete per nom. Mason (talk) 04:08, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, trivial characteristic. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:11, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I am generally in favor on categorizing people by medical conditions or personal beliefs. But not on whether they drink alcohol or smoke cigarettes. Who is going to search for that kind of information? Dimadick (talk) 13:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. Being cured from addiction is interesting, and should be explained in article body. However, People cured from the flu or another disease or condition will not be a good basis for a category. Place Clichy (talk) 15:38, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:Copper Buddha statues

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge (non-admin closure) HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 00:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's only one copper statue in here, which isn't helpful for navigaiton. Mason (talk) 02:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge for now, without objection to recreate the category when some more articles are available. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:12, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge I suspect that we already have more relevant articles on the topic. But the material of the statue has nothing to do with what it depicts. It seems to be a trivial intersection. Dimadick (talk) 13:30, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strongly disagree with that last bit. But copper statues tend to be regarded as bronze statues, as the Sultanganj Buddha was for over a century, until an actual analysis was done. Johnbod (talk) 17:58, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.


Category:GA-Class vital articles in Biology

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 11:32, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Given the target category literally begins with the title of this page, I am not seeing how this is a useful category redirect? HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 02:19, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Mesoamerican music

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 9#Category:Mesoamerican music

Category:Songs from television series

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename & purge.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 16:06, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale:
WP:C2C for parent category Category:Songs written for works; sibling categories Category:Songs written for video games‎ and Category:Songs written for films‎. However, I am listing this for a full CfD because it would entail purging the category of songs which were not defined by being for a TV series. HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 01:07, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply
]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_February_1&oldid=1206014688"