Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2015 December 18
December 18
File:Philadelphia Fire patch.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep and update File:PhiladelphiaFire.png, delete the remaining two. — ξxplicit 06:15, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Philadelphia Fire patch.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Evrik (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
- File:Philadelphia Fire ladder 23 patch.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Evrik (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
- File:PhiladelphiaFire.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Evrik (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)
Three non-free images are being used in
]- First, let me say ... these were all loaded nine years ago. The source for all of them was the official website of the PFD. Lord knows what that URL was nine years ago. Today, it's http://www.phila.gov/fire .
- Second, if any were deleted, I would say that it should be the black and gold departmental patch, though I do think that patch adds dimension to the logo on the top of the page. The "Fire ladder 23" patch is in the section about the stations. This patch is distinctive as it is the Chinatown Station, the house of Dragons.
- Thanks, --evrik (talk) 22:31, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- I agree that the "Fire Ladder 23" patch is distinctive and it would probably be acceptable if used in the infobox of a stand-alone article about the ladder company; However, just adding it to what is essentially an WP:NFLISTS. The reader's understanding of the Philadelphia fire department is not significantly improved by seeing the image and removing the image cannot be detrimental to the reader's understanding of something that is not being discussed at all. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:22, 19 December 2015 (UTC)]
- I agree that the "Fire Ladder 23" patch is distinctive and it would probably be acceptable if used in the infobox of a stand-alone article about the ladder company; However, just adding it to what is essentially an
- Maybe delete all three and upload http://www.phila.gov/fire/images/logo.jpg instead? --Stefan2 (talk) 21:21, 20 December 2015 (UTC)]
- For two of them maybe, but the house of dragons should stay. --evrik (talk) 15:33, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Except that the current usage of the "House of Dragons" still does not satisfy all 10 of the non-free content criteria listed at WP:NFCCE, "it is the duty of users seeking to include or retain content to provide a valid rationale; those seeking to remove or delete it are not required to show that one cannot be created" and decorative usage for a single entry in a list of other fire stations is something generally not considered accpetable per NFLISTS and NFCC#8.-- Marchjuly (talk) 21:52, 11 January 2016 (UTC)]
- Except that the current usage of the "House of Dragons" still does not satisfy all 10 of the non-free content criteria listed at
- For two of them maybe, but the house of dragons should stay. --evrik (talk) 15:33, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Moldova FA.svg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep in Moldovan Football Federation, remove all other instances. — ξxplicit 06:15, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- File:Moldova FA.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by HonorTheKing (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Non-free image being used in
- Remove from all articles but Football Association of Moldova. Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 17:54, 18 December 2015 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Siya and Ram.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as
- File:Siya and Ram.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kritksh (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Usage does not satisfy
]
Is there any problem with this image??
This picture shows the lead actors of the tv serial. If there is any problem tell me and tell me What i should do.
Kritksh (talk) 15:00, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- The problem is that the ]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Tetra Tech logo.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as
- File:Tetra Tech logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Phonecalls (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This logo does not appear to be very original, certainly not as much as some of the logos on
]- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.