Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 December 10

< December 9	December 11 >

December 10

File:FEU nurse-doctor statues by Vicente Manansala.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:12, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is no FOP in the Philippines FASTILY 05:37, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AlwaysandforReal.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:12, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Currently used in the biography of Adeaze. Now that the album Always and for Real is non-notable, the image would be replaceable by a free image of the music duo, though now nonexistent. Also, the album cover may merely identify the music duo, but the cover doesn't make the album itself significant to the biography when the album already merged. George Ho (talk) 07:31, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tajdar-e-Haram Sabri Brothers Live At BBC 1977.webm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:12, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused/

WP:NOTWEBHOST, & unclear copyright status FASTILY 08:20, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:L'Arrivée d'un train en gare de La Ciotat, Complete.webm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:59, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 08:22, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Now used. Yann (talk) 16:15, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bob's game puzzle gameplay.webm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 December 18#File:Bob's_game_puzzle_gameplay.webm}}

Bobsgame (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bob's game game world 2008.webm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 December 18#File:Bob's_game_game_world_2008.webm}}

Bobsgame (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bob's game Outside test.webm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 December 18#File:Bob's_game_Outside_test.webm}}

Bobsgame (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Uploads by User:Andrew Parodi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 January 4#User:Andrew_Parodi}}

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Uploads of 2D Art by User:Andrew Parodi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: All deleted Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:06, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

These five images are depictions of 2D art of which the copyright status is unclear. Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:46, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unclear where these were taken; they may be subject to FOP restrictions. -FASTILY 20:15, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Copyright status unclear. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 20:30, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mojanglogoold.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:12, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted on Commons; see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mojang.svg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 21:05, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Picture of american buddhist with thai buddha.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:12, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File is an unused, censored version of File:American Buddhist with Thai Buddha photo.jpg Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:10, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Patsy Hendren, cricketer, 1937.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A photo from 1937 placed on Flickr in 2010 under a CC license. Either this is Flickr washing or copyfraud. Bringing it here to get some help determining which. Majora (talk) 21:12, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Roesch House Historical Marker 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:12, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted text on marker. No freedom of panorama for this in the United States. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 22:46, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AlderMarker.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:12, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted text on marker. No freedom of panorama for this in the United States. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 22:47, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NewCaliforniaMarker01.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:12, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted text on marker. No freedom of panorama for this in the United States. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 22:48, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NewCaliforniaMarker02.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:12, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted text on marker. No freedom of panorama for this in the United States. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 22:48, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Old Dunstable.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:12, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted text on marker. No freedom of panorama for this in the United States. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 22:52, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rochester Michigan Rollin Sprague Historical Marker.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:12, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted text on marker. No freedom of panorama for this in the United States. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 22:53, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TheGroveHistoricalMarker.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:12, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted text on marker. No freedom of panorama for this in the United States. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 22:54, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Thornton Sign.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. Feel free to create a centralized repository for documenting permissions for regional historical markers. Also feel free to start a centralized discussion on any other issue. Until then, we must assume the text on the sign is copyrighted. czar 09:55, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted text on marker. No freedom of panorama for this in the United States. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 22:55, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Oppose -- The elimination of images of historical markers on Wikipedia is a crime against history. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 06:23, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Even if it were, we still need to know the copyright status of the text imaged. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:19, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Oppose - IMHO there should be one discussion about historical markers in general that editors can reference about their use, either to allow or not allow. Until that is done, I oppose further deletions of them. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 14:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The copyright rules on this issue are very clear. Do you have any questions about them? Or do you just not want this to be deleted? Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 14:56, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think any historical markers should be deleted, including the ones above that were deleted. This isn't a work of art, nobody's trying to make a buck off of it, and nobody is saying they put the sign up. They're historic markers, and you treat it like the people who post them are claiming they created

Peanuts or some crap like that. What's next? Are we going to delete train station signs and highway signs because they somehow violate freedom of panorama laws? ---------User:DanTD (talk) 05:50, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

The copyright status doesn't change with what you said. Train station signs and highway signs are unlikely to be original enough to qualify for copyright protection. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 05:57, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see nothing here forbidding pictures of historical markers. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 19:17, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is the text, not the marker. Imagine if CNN printed out an article and posted it outside. The text is still copyrighted. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 19:31, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CNN, and other news outlets give sources to their stories. Here the sources are clear, and impossible to plagiarize. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 13:58, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't affect the copyright status. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 14:31, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I go back to my original point. I think it's worthwhile to have a greater discussion on memorial markers in general. Plagiarizing is when attribution is not given, which is not the case here. I see no harm in having a larger discussion on this topic, to expand those who can comment. As a result of the discussion, there will be a thread to point back to moving forward as this comes up again in the future. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 16:50, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What would you like to discuss? The text is copyrighted. If you would like to discuss hosting it anyway because they probably won't mind, we can't do that. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 17:31, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are you the expert on this issue? My point is to get broader discussion on the issue of memorial markers, and I'm not speaking of this one file alone. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 18:52, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DevnarayanPostCard.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:12, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indian government works are copyrighted. See commons:Template:EdictGov-India. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 23:05, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jabha East Africa.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:12, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Logo of terrorist group. Copyright owned by terror group. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 23:21, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bordo Bereliler logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:12, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

KazekageTR (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

).

Please see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:OKK.png. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:29, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.