Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 December 12

< December 11	December 13 >

December 12

File:PassengerHoldingUpJetAirways.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails NFCC#8. Is a screenshot of a cell phone video of an unidentified person holding up a flight. The events are described in the article, and seeing an unidentified person does not contribute to the reader's understanding. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 02:16, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sara Statue.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:09, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is no FOP in Sri Lanka FASTILY 04:02, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chellapandi.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rehman (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Inapplicable license; and, photo does not appear to be encyclopedic. Brianga (talk) 04:27, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Editor is now indef blocked and the image appears to be more of the playing around that got this editor blocked. Not a useful image. -- Whpq (talk) 14:14, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Go-Gos cover art

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep and remove from The Go-Go's#History. Wikiacc (¶) 16:14, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free cover art being used in

WP:NFC#UUI. Suggest keep for the stand-alone articles about the album/song and remove from the band's article. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:02, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Keep - Definitely complies with fair use guidelines for the Vacation album article. But the image should be removed from the band article, as it does not meet the fair use guidalines within that article. Rlendog (talk) 12:45, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

George Michael cover art

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 January 12#George_Michael_cover_art}}

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A memorial for potassium suppository (installation art).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:09, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reproduction of art in Greece. No FOP in Greece. See commons:Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Greece. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 06:26, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:David Gilmour On An Island.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: remove from

On an Island (song). — ξ ^xplicit 06:53, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Non-free cover art being used in

non-free use rationale is provided for each use, but no source is given other than "The cover art can be obtained from the record label", so it's hard to verify if the same cover art was actually used for both the album and the single. Googling the album shows the cover art is used for the album at Amazon, All Music and Gilmour's official website, but I can't find anything for the single. Unless someone is able to show that this is also the cover art for the single, then I think it should be removed from that article. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:16, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:5 covers.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:09, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free file being used in

WP:NFC#cite_note-2. So, unless all of these non-free use issues can be resolved, I suggest delete for the file. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:27, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alisha playing the character 'Mia' on "Super Cops Vs Super Villains".jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be a tv/movie screenshot, dubious self-work claim. Probable copyvio. FASTILY 09:34, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rose City Transit 502 in 1961.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Claimed as own but attributed to an archive source. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:55, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:College acceptance rates.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete nominated revision. — ξ ^xplicit 06:53, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Referral owing to logo inclusion ( some of which are not necessarily free logos) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:10, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dont delete it I'll update the photo with none trade marked fair use logos. Wikideas1 (talk) 10:26, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the logos and only put fair use ones in the new uploaded image. Wikideas1 (talk) 12:41, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Waepa Logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Logo maybe above TOO, and I couldn't easily find the a CC license on the permission source listed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:12, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pet Shop Boys - Super.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as

F5 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Fieldafar (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

).

Only seeing text/shapes so querying why this is under non-free use? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:19, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PHOENIX LOGO.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as

F5 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Only seeing text, so querying why this is under 'non-free' use? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:20, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alcatel Onetouch logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as

F5 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Only seeing text, querying why this is 'non-free'? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:29, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Google Boys Arimalam.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as

F5 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Unused image by a now blocked editor which was likely intended for addition whatever this editor was playing around with. Whpq (talk) 13:19, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'd toss the image in the dustbin. User seemed to be here to promote some rinky-dink organization of his own fabrication, and the use of the Biography logo in the image is likely a trademark/copyright violation. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:14, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ventilator Soundtrack Cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails

WP:NFCC#8. - Vivvt (Talk) 14:07, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Turner Construction.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as

F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Only seeing text, why is this non-free? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:15, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Because people don't understand copyright and do what they see others doing? Marked F8. --Majora (talk) 05:44, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Transnet Freight Rail logo.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons has this as being below threshold of originality, why is this non-free? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:19, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NYMAS Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 18:08, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't the organization's logo, it's their website heading which happens to use some shadow. Ridiculous to assume it's an official logo. $ɱ$ (talk) · vbm · coi) 18:33, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Next time it'd be easier to just remove it from the article boldly and let it be tagged as unused non-free image. But technically it shouldn't even have the fair use rationale as it's {{PD-textlogo}}. Agreed that it isn't adding value to the article. czar 18:08, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dichtel 2015 hi-res-download 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:45, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:49, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete along with all the other ones below this that follow the same format (not going to repeat myself over a dozen times). It was deleted on Commons because of licensing issues. Those issues still exist regardless of where it is. We can't keep any of these photos. --Majora (talk) 05:46, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kun 2016 hi-res-download 4.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:46, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:49, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Basting 2016 hi-res-download 4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:46, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:49, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fecteau 2016 hi-res-download 4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:47, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Baldwin 2016 hi-res-download 4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:47, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Khot 2016 hi-res-download 4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:47, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:52, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jones 2016 hi-res-download 4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss

the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:51, 12 December 2016 (UTC)here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:47, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jacobs-Jenkins 2016 hi-res-download 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:48, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:51, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nelson 2016 hi-res-download 4 ykva7hi.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:48, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:55, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Newman 2016 hi-res-download 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:48, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:52, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Orphan 2016 hi-res-download 4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:48, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:53, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Prakash 2016 hi-res-download 4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:48, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:53, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Redniss 2016 hi-res-download 4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:49, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:53, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ReidKelley 2016 hi-res-download 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:49, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Richards-Kortum 2016 hi-res-download 3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:49, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:53, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Scott 2016 hi-res-download 4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:49, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:55, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stillman 2016 hi-res-download 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:55, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wolfe 2016 hi-res-download 4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:09, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:53, 12 December 2016 (UTC)~~[reply]

subject requests deletion. Beatley (talk) 19:52, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Awuah 2015 hi-res-download 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:53, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chandran 2015 hi-res-download 3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:50, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:53, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cohen 2015 hi-res-download 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:51, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:55, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - It is not at all clear what the situation is, and probably would require a legal opinion o the interpretation of the license. On the face, of it, the license as supplied at their website is very specific that the images are under a CC-BY license which allows for commercial use, so these images have the appropriate license. As for the restriction on "media", what does that even mean? Wikipedia is a published medium, so it would seem to me that we are "media". -- Whpq (talk) 22:08, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Desmond 2015 hi-res-download 3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:51, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:53, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dorrance 2015 hi-res-download 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:51, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:53, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lerner 2015 hi-res-download 3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:51, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:56, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Eisenman 2015 hi-res-download 3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per this discussion at Commons, this file is only available under a non-commercial license. Since this is not as clear cut as many similar cases, bringing to discuss here in case there's something I'm missing. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:52, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the license says: "CC-BY"; i have a difficult time understanding the decision at commons and wikipedia is not bound by it. Beatley (talk) 21:55, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Foundation sent in an OTRS ticket explicitly stating that they do not wish to license their images to anyone except "the media", not including Wikipedia, under CC-BY. It can be argued that they may or may not have the legal ability to restrict it, but their expressed intent is clear. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 22:39, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the macarthur foundation responded to an email inquiry by an admin. their intent is unclear, and we cannot get context from the otrs. what does 'except "the media"' mean? is wikipedia media? do personality rights cover this? the CC-BY however, seems clear. Beatley (talk) 21:06, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia articles are not required to use only files which come form Commons, but files uploaded locally to Wikipedia still have to satisfy

WP:RP or c:COM:PR. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:50, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A Papua New Guinean wooden sculpture, Stanford University New Guinea sculpture garden.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:09, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted sculpture. No freedom of panorama in the United States for this. See commons:Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_States. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 22:29, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A Pathan sowar, 23rd Cavalry (Frontier Force), 1908 (c). Mrs Williamson..jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:09, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear copyright status. No evidence of any previous publication, which is required to enter the public domain. Also, Museum asserts copyright. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 22:35, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Aaron Boucher (8-10-2001).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused low-resolution photo of non-notable person without an article. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 22:47, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Abramoff scotland3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a work of the federal court system. A court employee was not there at the golf course taking the photo. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 22:52, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Essex Police Response Vehicle.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Wikiacc (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:09, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Leobruce02 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log

).

Suspected copyright violation. The uploaded has recently uploaded six images, the other five of which have been nominated for speedy deletion for copyright issues. The image metadata indicates that this file has been through a digital post-production process, this suggests that it may have been downloaded from a webpage. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:51, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See also Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 December 13#File:TSGunits 123.jpg, uploaded by the same user. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:09, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.