Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 July 12

< July 11	July 13 >

July 12

File:Molirena1989poster.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete ★ Bigr Tex 21:49, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File was tagged with {{

WP:NFCC. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:59, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete - no sourced discussion about the poster so there is not the contextual significance needed for a non free image. --Whpq (talk) 03:19, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It's use in the article is adequate to justify its fair-use. A political campaign of that era runs on its posters, they are its visual means of communication, this image illustrates that. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:12, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this particular poster is significant in such a way that removing it would be detrimental to the reader's understanding of the subject of the article, then there should be some sourced discussion of this significance somewhere in the article itself. The candidate depicted on the poster seems to be Guillermo Endara, who is only mentioned once in the entire article: "The MOLIRENA was again part of the Democratic Alliance of Civic Opposition (ADOC) electoral alliance in May 1989 which supported the presidential candidacy of Guillermo Endara of the Arnulfista Party ..." A non-free poster does not seem to be needed for the reader to understand that sentence. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:34, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, how would a reader of the article get an understanding of the graphical profile and graphical discourse of the party without an actual image? The image represents the graphic profile at a certain juncture, but illustrates well how Panamanian parties communicate to their voters (such as how constituency is presented, how parliamentary and presidential candidatures are combined). --Soman (talk) 13:29, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is no sourced discussion of any of that type of thing at all anywhere to be found in the article. If this poster is significant in such a way that removing it would be detrimental to the reader understanding any of the those things, then that information should be added to the article and supported by a reliable source to avoid being challenged as

WP:NFCC#3a), and the picture of the candidate (who can be seen at Guillermo Endara). The reader does not really need to see an election poster to understand that the names of both parliamentary and presidential candidates appeared on it in text and that the constituency was described a certain way on it in text. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:33, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Emily Fitch Skins4Promo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Totally bogus public domain claim Whpq (talk) 03:14, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Naomi Campbell Skins4Promo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Totally bogus public domain claim Whpq (talk) 03:16, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hurt Film Poster.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free film poster, incorrectly uploaded to illustrate Hurt (2015 film) (which it has nothing to do with). And the film it does belong to, Hurt (2009 film), already has File:Hurt poster 5 RGB 96dpi.jpg on it, so this is simple duplication. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 05:04, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As uploader, I mistaken the poster for the wrong film. I apologize for my carelessness. Blue Adventure (talk) 03:16, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Blues Brothers (video game) first level gameplay demo.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Game screenshots can be useful (and sometimes needed) to much better display an aspect of an article subject. However, this image seems to be nothing more than decoration for the article. Also, I'm pretty sure that for the most part, Wikipedia doesn't allow .GIF animated screenshots of non-free video games. editorEهեইдအ😎 06:48, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Convert to a single, illustrative screenshot, which would better serve the purposes of the image's fair use rationale. It's important to have a visualization of the gameplay and art style, but this clip is excessive and, as of now, unjustified. czar 02:19, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:US-mfg20-40.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, superior version available: File:US Manufacturing Employment Graph - 1920 to 1940.svg FASTILY 08:34, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tribal Cards.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails

WP:NFCC#8, non-free file which does not add to a reader's understanding of article text FASTILY 22:06, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

It's a start and pinterest might not be reliable, but here is a source for the image. VegasCasinoKid (talk) 10:40, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NYAppleCards.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails

WP:NFCC#8, non-free file which does not add to a reader's understanding of article text FASTILY 22:06, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IFIS Proposed.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, superior version available: File:IFIS Proposed.svg FASTILY 22:07, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IFIS Normal.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, superior version available: File:IFIS Normal.svg FASTILY 22:08, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IFIS Authorized.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, superior version available: File:IFIS Authorised.svg FASTILY 22:08, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Owainbut software logo.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal image, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 23:38, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.