Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2018 October 5

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
< October 4 October 6 >

October 5

File:Poly.pov

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: No consensus on redirect, but consensus in favour of keeping it in some way. By the by one wonders if someone might succeed in persuading the developers into a server side upload to Commons. Something to seek consensus for on Commons, I guess. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:38, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Poly.pov (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cyp (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

unused (see

WP:NOTWEBHOST), unsuitable file format for Wikipedia. Since this is just a text file, it should either go on Github or be copied to a page in the Wikipedia namespace FASTILY 01:31, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Keep or redirect to
    WP:REFUND
    archives:
Either redirect it or leave it alone. The reference desk links should be reason enough to keep at least a redirect. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:01, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:18, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to User:Cyp/Poly.pov per Anachronist (sorry for the wrong ping, Jo-Jo) . I can't see any harm doing that. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 06:39, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect per Finnusertop. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:44, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Good grief please don't redirect a file into user space. Nothing about that makes any sense. Honestly, if people are using it (and it sounds like they are), I don't see any real reason not to keep it. I'm not clear on why the user page isn't sufficient, but clearly there are people who find the file useful so keep. But good grief, a redirect from file space into user space is a bad precedent and is just asking to break things. (For that matter, it's subject to speedy deletion under F2.) --B (talk) 20:06, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:55, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bible Hill Crest.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relicense to non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:39, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bible Hill Crest.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by 718 Bot (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This was seemingly also uploaded to commons, by a user name that suggests a link with the organisation represented. Was there an OTRS ticket associated with that upload? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:17, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:20, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I've asked for help at
    Wikipedia:OTRS noticeboard#File:Bible Hill Crest.png. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 06:49, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • information Note: I don't see an OTRS ticket. (OTRS search is awful.) — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:13, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:57, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • As a general rule, companies/organizations aren't going to deliberately license their logos under a
    subst:npd}}. --B (talk) 02:13, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vignelli NYC Subway map 2008.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 October 13. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:39, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vignelli NYC Subway map 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
File:Vignelli 1972.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tone mark comparative chart.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:05, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tone mark comparative chart.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Menchi (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

unused, can be represented by wikitext, no foreseeable use FASTILY 07:33, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 13:24, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Images by Garkeith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete -FASTILY 06:55, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Countryclub.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Garkeith (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 
File:FortNewSalem.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
File:FortNewSalem2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
File:FortNewSalem3.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
File:Marcus vick.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
File:Todd sauerbrun.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
File:Davisson-brothers.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
File:Joe DeForest.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

Most of this user's uploads here and at Commons have been deleted as copyvios [1] so it is difficult to accept these remaining images as valid. There are a variety of web-resolution images and images with either no EXIF data or various and sundry cameras. See also c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:CoveredBridgeSimpsonCreek2.jpg B (talk) 18:12, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2018_October_5&oldid=1166629270"