Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 April 22
April 22
File:Execution of Nguyen Van Lem.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 May 1. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:50, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- File:Execution of Nguyễn Văn Lém.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:I Want You Back NSYNC Video.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy delete per
]- File:I Want You Back NSYNC Video.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Angryjoe1111 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Even with the statement as part of the purpose of using the music video screenshot, "The screenshot accurately illustrates the description used in the article about the music video in question
," the content at the section
- Delete – from original uploader: I'm fine with the removing the image based on the discussion from Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 April 20. — Angryjoe1111 (talk) 04:21, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Envy Adams performance Scott Pilgrim vs. the World image.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2020 May 1. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:51, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- File:Envy Adams performance Scott Pilgrim vs. the World image.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:The Best of Volume 1 (Silverchair album - cover art).jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Fails
- File:The Best of Volume 1 (Silverchair album - cover art).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Khaino85 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Very similar to standard cover. No need for second piece of non-free media. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:36, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- Comment How similar? It describes a different, albeit related, product, and includes the text, Complete Videology Plus Emotion Pictures. This signifies that it is the DVD album. The lower image in the infobox could be moved to a new infobox for the DVD section, which is described below the CD/cassette album of similar name. This lower image allows readers to determine that they have the group's music videos and not just their audio tracks if they used the upper "standard" image alone.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 06:01, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Throwing Muses bw promo.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:07, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- File:Throwing Muses bw promo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gmcapt (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
There's an updated photo. No need for fair use. PROD denied. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:45, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Per NFCC 1, as there are freely licensed images of the band. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:42, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Tearinupmyheartvideo.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy delete. per
]- File:Tearinupmyheartvideo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Angryjoe1111 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails NFCC #8 - there's no critical discussion of this scene or why it's significant, therefore it's purely decorative. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:51, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as failing Talk: Contribs) 10:53, 22 April 2020 (UTC)]
- Delete – from original uploader: I initially added the image based on unsourced information added several years ago, which I have now removed. — Angryjoe1111 (talk) 04:24, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Nisha Ravikrishnan in Gattimela.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:48, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
- File:Nisha Ravikrishnan in Gattimela.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cinemapremi (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This is an image of a character in an Indian soap opera
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Breast development in a transgender woman.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:48, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
- File:Breast development in a transgender woman.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Medgirl131 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
- File:Breast development in a transgender woman 2.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Medgirl131 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Suspected
Free ones like File:Transgender woman breast.png exist, but it does not seem to come from a (verifiable) peer-reviewed journal source. 84.250.17.211 (talk) 17:43, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete but because of NFCC 1, which this clearly fails, as there's already freely licensed images of the depicted topic. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:40, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Rapunzel in Fairy Tale Forest.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:48, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
- File:Rapunzel in Fairy Tale Forest.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Magafuzula (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned image, very poor quality, no encyclopedic use. Brought here as it had been nominated at possibly unfree images and I am unsure if Prod would have been appropriate. Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:17, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.