Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 March 25

< March 24	March 26 >

March 25

File:Kernimage ken.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kernimage ken.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:06, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Elizabeth Holmes 2016.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Missing evidence of permission. File may be restored anytime upon receipt of valid permission via OTRS. -FASTILY 03:26, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Elizabeth Holmes 2016.jpeg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:08, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Holmes is the CEO of a hi-tech firm. After this challenge to the licensing I googled the name of the uploader. All the top hits were to an individual who is the Vice President for Communications at that hi-tech firm. If this image belonged to the firm, our uploader would literally be the executive with authority to release it under a CC license.
Since she is a close colleague of Holmes I find it completely credible she snapped the image herself, and uploaded it herself. Geo Swan (talk) 04:43, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:4K or HD Bell Fibe TV.jpeg 2.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:4K or HD Bell Fibe TV.jpeg 2.jpeg. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:10, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, essentially orphaned (not used in the main space) with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:25, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:4K or HD Bell Fibe TV.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:4K or HD Bell Fibe TV.jpeg. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:11, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, essentially orphaned (not used in the main space) with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:25, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kindle Oasis 2017.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kindle Oasis 2017.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:11, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CornhengeDublinOhio.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:CornhengeDublinOhio.jpg. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:12, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wind Harp (1967) South San Francisco.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wind Harp (1967) South San Francisco.jpg. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:14, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As I mentioned in the Commons DR, Siris doesn't mention a copyright for this sculpture. Abzeronow (talk) 00:23, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GPD Win-Face View-Open and Running Windows 10.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Derivative of non-free content -FASTILY 03:26, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:GPD Win-Face View-Open and Running Windows 10.jpg. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:15, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The user who initially reported this image was a sockpuppet of a user who was abusing multiple accounts. I took this picture. Are you seriously telling me that because it contains a PICTURE of Windows 10, that it must be deleted? Don't you think that this is a LITTLE ridiculous?StrangeApparition2011 (talk) 02:29, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It seems surprising to me that none of the contributors who objected to the screen showing windows 10 images suggested (1) fogging the recognizable Windows 10 portion; or (2) cropping the portion of the image with Windows 10 graphics.
I cropped it, and uploaded it to File:GPD Win-Face (cropped).jpg. Geo Swan (talk) 05:03, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Signature of VJ Rannvijay Singh Singha.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:11, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, low quality SVG (it looks like software tried to trace the source image automatically and did poorly) The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:10, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:27, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chronicle illustration.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image of a magazine cover. The uploader claims to be the artist who created the cover artwork, but it is unlear how much creative work went into the magazine cover itself. Jordan 1972 (talk) 19:50, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, it could be relicensed to a non-free magazine cover and used on the San Francisco Chronicle Magazine article. There is however already a cover of the in that article that could deem this cover excess to requirements. Salavat (talk) 00:30, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kristina Kovač microwave.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But, this is not own work of the uploader. According to the Kristina Kovač article, the photo was taken by Kristina Kovač herself. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:45, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.