Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 September 21
September 21
Non-free sign board photos
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 14:50, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Gallery Nature Morte street sign NYC.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Valueyou (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
- File:Max's Kansas City street signs.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Valueyou (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
WP:FREER. Omitting the file the article doesn't really detrimentally affect the reader's understanding of Nagy or the content about the gallery in that particular section; so, there's really no loss of encyclopedic information and there's no way to keep this file unless the photo itself can be converted to a free or PD license.File:Max's Kansas City street signs.jpg has similar NFCC#1 and NFCC#8 issues. This file is being used in the main infobox of Max's Kansas City as it's rationale states, but there are still FREER issues in that this is basically nothing other than a photograph showing the club's name. The photo actually appears to be a crop of a much larger photo shown here
, which actually might have more contextual relevance than simply a photo of the sign board and a partial storefront. The reader doesn't need to see a non-free photo of the sign board to know what the name of the club was per FREER and none of the other information provided by the photo really significantly improves the reader's understanding in any way; so, once again, omitting the file isn't going to be detrimental to the reader's understanding what's written in the article. If the club's sign board was unique or otherwise a copyright-protected creative work in some way, then perhaps it would be easier to justify its non-free use; that, however, isn't really the case with respect to this file. So, once I again, I don't see how this file can be kept if there's no way to convert its licensing to a free or PD license.
-- Marchjuly (talk) 01:41, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:NSYNC in 1998.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:06, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:NSYNC in 1998.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lazz R (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
I'm bringing this up for discussion based on some things pointed out in a more general discussion at
]- Delete as failing WP:NFCC#2. The image is credited to Getty by Billboard in the popup caption. The image is not the subject of significant sourced commentary, and Getty clearly is getting revenue from the licensing of this image as shown by its use in the Billboard article which is used to illustrate the band and is the exact same purpose used in the Wikipedia article. Although Getty has in instances falsly claimed ownership over photos, it does not seem likely in this case. Steve Eichner is a professional photographer with thousands of photos licensed through Getty. -- Whpq (talk) 13:58, 21 September 2021 (UTC)]
- Delete as failing
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Minóy cassette cover.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:06, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
File was prodded for deletion for the following reason:
There are a couple of problems with this file. Even though
free license that Wikimedia accepts which make using a non-free unnecessary. The file was subsequently deprodded by the uploader with this edit; so, I'm bringing it here to FFD for further discussion. The uploader has stated that its possible that this file has been released under a CC 3.0 license and if it can be shown that it has been released under one of these CC licenses, then the file can be probably be relicensed and kept. It still would not be appropriate for primary identification purposes in the main infobox in my opinion, but it could be moved to the body of the article. If it can't be shown to have been released under an acceptable free license, then it needs to remain non-free and thus would be subject to Wikipedia's non-free content use policy. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:31, 21 September 2021 (UTC)]
- Delete - a free license would require proof which is not currently in evidence. As an image for visual identification of the subject, this is image is not suitable. The photo was clearly taken as an art shot or the cover with motion blur making the subject's features indistinct. -- Whpq (talk) 14:01, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Whpq: Just want to point out that the uploader posted a link on their user talk page which does show the same photograph being used on the cover a book, but the also shows that the book has, unfortunately, been released under a CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 license; so, it looks as if this still needs to be non-free absent anything else showing something different. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:56, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Overwatch loot box.gif
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 October 10. FASTILY 09:28, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- File:Overwatch loot box.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Easter Vigil in Altoona, PA.PNG
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Easter Vigil in Altoona, PA.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Steelers628 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unlikely to be own work by the uploader. Used here in 2014. Is this the same file as the deleted
Stefan2 (talk) 23:41, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.