Wikipedia:Peer review/Automated/August 2007

Enter Sandman

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• This article has no or few
  [?]
• There are a few occurrences of
  WP:AWT
  . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
  • it has been
  • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
    [?]
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 01:15, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cow & Chicken

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
  [?]
• Consider removing links that add little to the article or that have been repeated in close proximity to other links to the same article, as per
  [?]
• This article has no or few
  [?]
• If there is not a
  [?]
• There may be an applicable
  [?]
  (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
• This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as
  [?]
• This article needs
  [?]
• The article will need references. See
  [?]
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 01:15, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Saint Patrick

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Per
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• Watch for
  redundancy exercises
  .)
  • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
• The article will need references. See
  [?]
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 02:05, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Council of the European Union

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Per
  [?]
• Watch for
  redundancy exercises
  .)
  • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 23 additive terms, a bit too much.
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 02:05, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Doping at the 2007 Tour de France

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
  [?]

 Done following DeLarge's peer review. Let me know if there is anything specific wrong with the lead now Dick G

• If there is not a
  [?]

 Done moved Vino image as most appropriate candidate. No generic image is available Dick G

• There may be an applicable
  [?]
  (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)

 Not done no infobox applicable Dick G

• Per
  [?]

 Not done only units of measurement are in wikis, not article body Dick G

• Per
  [?]
  Specifically, an example is 54 km.

 Not done couldn't find any non-wiki examples Dick G

• Per
  [?]
• There are a few occurrences of
  WP:AWT
  . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
  • allege
  • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
    [?]

 Done attributed all allegations. Let me know if any other specific examples Dick G

• Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: behaviour (B) (American: behavior), favorite (A) (British: favourite), favourite (B) (American: favorite), organize (A) (British: organise), ization (A) (British: isation), isation (B) (American: ization).

 Done should be consistent - happy to be shown specific examples Dick G

• The script has spotted the following contractions: don't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded.

 Not done examples are all within quotations Dick G

• As done in
  [?]

 Done hopefully all such occurences picked up Dick G

• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

 Done request in to

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 02:05, 15 September 2007 (UTC) Cheers for your help Dick G 04:49, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Angela Mudge

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
  [?]
  •  Done, though once again I'm not nuts on how this affects the article...
• There may be an applicable
  [?]
  (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  •  Not done Had a look, and there isn't, at least not for this kind of off-the-beaten-track-not-involved-in-the-Olympics athlete.
• If this article is about a person, please add {{persondata|PLEASE SEE [[WP:PDATA]]!}} along with the required parameters to the article - see
  [?]
  •  Done
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]
  •  Done

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 02:05, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Avatar: The Last Airbender

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Per
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• As per
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• The script has spotted the following contractions: isn't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded.
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 02:05, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Jersey Route 33

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Per
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 02:05, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Homer at the Bat

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
  [?]
• Watch for
  redundancy exercises
  .)
  • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
• The script has spotted the following contractions: Can't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded.
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 02:05, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indonesian architecture

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
  [?]
• Avoid including
  [?]
• There may be an applicable
  [?]
  (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
• Per
  [?]
• There are a few occurrences of
  WP:AWT
  . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
  • arguably
  • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
    [?]
• Watch for
  redundancy exercises
  .)
  • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 02:05, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gloucester County, Virginia

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• As per
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• There are a few occurrences of
  WP:AWT
  . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
  • it has been
  • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
    [?]
• Watch for
  redundancy exercises
  .)
  • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
• The script has spotted the following contractions: don't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded.
• As done in
  [?]
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 02:05, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kingda Ka

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
  Specifically, an example is 456 ft.
• When writing standard abbreviations, the abbreviations should not have a 's' to demark plurality (for example, change kms to km and lbs to lb).
• Per
  [?]
• There are a few occurrences of
  WP:AWT
  . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
  • it has been
  • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
    [?]
• Watch for
  redundancy exercises
  .)
  • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 02:23, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Azusa Street Revival

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• If there is not a
  [?]
• There may be an applicable
  [?]
  (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
• Per
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• There are a few occurrences of
  WP:AWT
  . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
  • is considered
  • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
    [?]
• Watch for
  redundancy exercises
  .)
  • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
• The script has spotted the following contractions: doesn't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded.
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 02:31, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Lombardo

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 02:31, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leona Lewis

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Consider removing links that add little to the article or that have been repeated in close proximity to other links to the same article, as per
  [?]
• If this article is about a person, please add {{persondata|PLEASE SEE [[WP:PDATA]]!}} along with the required parameters to the article - see
  [?]
  •  Done — AnemoneProjectors (会話) 13:27, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Per
  [?]
  • It is not necessary to change this as "The X Factor" refers to a TV programme. — AnemoneProjectors (会話) 13:27, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at
  [?]
  •  Done — AnemoneProjectors (会話) 13:27, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• There are a few occurrences of
  WP:AWT
  . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
  • it has been
  • it is claimed
  • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
    [?]
    • These are cited. — AnemoneProjectors (会話) 13:27, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 02:31, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Project Gutenberg

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• Watch for
  redundancy exercises
  .)
  • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 02:31, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shawn Green

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at
  [?]
• The lead is for summarizing the rest of the article, and should not introduce new topics not discussed in the rest of the article, as per
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• This article has no or few
  [?]
• If this article is about a person, please add {{persondata|PLEASE SEE [[WP:PDATA]]!}} along with the required parameters to the article - see
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• As per
  [?]
• Per
  Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings)
  , avoid using special characters (ex: &+{}[]) in headings.
• Generally, trivia sections are looked down upon; please either remove the trivia section or incorporate any important facts into the rest of the article.
  [?]
• There are a few occurrences of
  WP:AWT
  . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
  • arguably
  • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
    [?]
• Watch for
  redundancy exercises
  .)
  • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 19 additive terms, a bit too much.
• The script has spotted the following contractions: wasn't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded.
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 02:31, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Randy Orton

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Per
  [?]
• This article may need to undergo
  [?]
• There are a few occurrences of
  WP:AWT
  . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
  • it has been
  • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
    [?]
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 02:31, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Ballad of the White Horse

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
  [?]
• Consider adding more
  [?]
• There may be an applicable
  [?]
  (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
• Per
  [?]
• Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: armour (B) (American: armor), neighbour (B) (American: neighbor), realize (A) (British: realise), ization (A) (British: isation), grey (B) (American: gray).
• Watch for
  redundancy exercises
  .)
  • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 02:31, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A. Leon Higginbotham, Jr.

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• If this article is about a person, please add {{persondata|PLEASE SEE [[WP:PDATA]]!}} along with the required parameters to the article - see
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 02:31, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

M62 motorway

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Consider removing links that add little to the article or that have been repeated in close proximity to other links to the same article, as per
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• There may be an applicable
  [?]
  (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
• Per
  [?]
• As done in
  [?]
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 02:31, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Snake scales

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• There may be an applicable
  [?]
  (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
• Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at
  [?]
• There are a few occurrences of
  WP:AWT
  . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
  • correctly
  • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
    [?]
• As done in
  [?]
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 02:31, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Glasses

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at
  [?]
• The lead is for summarizing the rest of the article, and should not introduce new topics not discussed in the rest of the article, as per
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• There may be an applicable
  [?]
  (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
• Per
  [?]
• Watch for
  redundancy exercises
  .)
  • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 02:31, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dorothy Gale

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Per
  [?]
• There may be an applicable
  [?]
  (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
• Per
  [?]
• Watch for
  redundancy exercises
  .)
  • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
• The script has spotted the following contractions: can't, isn't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded.
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 16:13, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thierry Henry

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Consider removing links that add little to the article or that have been repeated in close proximity to other links to the same article, as per
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• The script has spotted the following contractions: don't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded.
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 17:16, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Master Chief (Halo)

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Per
  [?]
• There may be an applicable
  [?]
  (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
• Per
  [?]
• When writing standard abbreviations, the abbreviations should not have a 's' to demark plurality (for example, change kms to km and lbs to lb).
• The script has spotted the following contractions: doesn't, don't, couldn't, can't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded.
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 17:16, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Freedom Monument (Riga)

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• There may be an applicable
  [?]
  (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
• Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: honor (A) (British: honour), neighbour (B) (American: neighbor), meter (A) (British: metre), organize (A) (British: organise), criticize (A) (British: criticise), ization (A) (British: isation), skillful (A) (British: skilful), grey (B) (American: gray), sulfur (A) (British: sulphur).
• As done in
  [?]
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 17:16, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Byron Nuclear Generating Station

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• If there is not a
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 17:16, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cow

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
  [?]
• Consider removing links that add little to the article or that have been repeated in close proximity to other links to the same article, as per
  [?]
• This article has no or few
  [?]
• If there is not a
  [?]
• There may be an applicable
  [?]
  (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
• This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as
  [?]
• This article needs
  [?]
• The article will need references. See
  [?]
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 17:16, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Continuum (album)

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
  [?]
• This article has no or few
  [?]
• If there is not a
  [?]
• Watch for
  redundancy exercises
  .)
  • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 16 additive terms, a bit too much.
  • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 17:16, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Waiting on the World to Change

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• This article has no or few
  [?]
• If there is not a
  [?]
• There are a few occurrences of
  WP:AWT
  . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
  • it has been
  • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
    [?]
• Watch for
  redundancy exercises
  .)
  • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 8 additive terms, a bit too much.
• The script has spotted the following contractions: don't, don't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded.
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 17:16, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

253 Mathilde

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Per
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as
  [?]
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 17:16, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dexter's Laboratory

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Per
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• As per
  [?]
• This article needs
  [?]
• The article will need references. See
  [?]
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 17:16, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Powerpuff Girls

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at
  [?]
• There are a few occurrences of
  WP:AWT
  . Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
  • apparently
  • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper
    [?]
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 17:16, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ban Ki-moon

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Per
  [?]
• If there is not a
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• The script has spotted the following contractions: don't, isn't, Don't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded.
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 17:16, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Constitution of Chad

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• This article has no or few
  [?]
• If there is not a
  [?]
• There may be an applicable
  [?]
  (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
• Per
  [?]
• Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: defence (B) (American: defense), organize (A) (British: organise), recognize (A) (British: recognise), criticize (A) (British: criticise), ization (A) (British: isation), isation (B) (American: ization).
• The script has spotted the following contractions: can't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded.
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 17:16, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hank Azaria

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• If there is not a
  [?]
• Watch for
  redundancy exercises
  .)
  • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 17:16, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Peaches Geldof

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• This article has no or few
  [?]
• If there is not a
  [?]
• If this article is about a person, please add {{persondata|PLEASE SEE [[WP:PDATA]]!}} along with the required parameters to the article - see
  [?]
• Per
  [?]
• As per
  [?]
• This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as
  [?]
• The script has spotted the following contractions: didn't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded.
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 17:16, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Honoré de Balzac

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Per
  [?]
• If there is not a
  [?]
• When writing standard abbreviations, the abbreviations should not have a 's' to demark plurality (for example, change kms to km and lbs to lb).
• Per
  [?]
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 17:16, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Letters Written in Sweden, Norway and Denmark

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Consider adding more
  [?]
• There may be an applicable
  [?]
  (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
• Watch for
  redundancy exercises
  .)
  • While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 27 additive terms, a bit too much.
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of
  [?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 17:16, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oil shale

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• The lead of this article may be too long, or may contain too many paragraphs. Please follow guidelines at
  [?]
• The lead is for summarizing the rest of the article, and should not introduce new topics not discussed in the rest of the article, as per
  [?]
• Per
  [?]

Y Done. Years provide no context so delinked. Full dates are linked for user prefs. LeadSongDog 16:12, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

*There may be an applicable