Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 February 4
February 4
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion on February 4, 2008
Template:Infobox Ship
The template was initially created due to an article move; however, the target template is now deprecated and members of the
- Delete - unless I'm missing something, this seems pretty obvious. --Hyperbole (talk) 22:56, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Parsecboy (talk) 01:27, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Deprecated, no reason to use it. Bart133 (t) (c) 02:06, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Good work cleaning these up. TomTheHand (talk) 18:50, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Just one of several yet to go. --Brad (talk) 20:02, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
History of the Republic of India
Delete "Modern India" refers to "post-Medieval India", not "post-Independence India". The sense "modern" used in this redirect is wrong. The article is about the history of
- Comment: Nitpick: I am not sure that this change will strictly result in the meaning that you intend. The Republic of India dates from January 1950, not from independence in August 1947. How are you going to describe the intervening 29 months? -- Arwel (talk) 20:05, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- The constitution came into effect in 1950, but history of Republic of India starts from 1947 as you can see from the article itself: "The History of the Republic of India began on August 15, 1947 when India became an independent Dominion within the British Commonwealth." Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 21:16, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - This seems like a better target than either Colonial India or History of India, and it definitely seems like a better target than no target at all. But if anyone better-versed with Indian history than I am really thinks this needs to go to History of India instead, that would also be okay with me. --Hyperbole (talk) 23:00, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Raichase → Railpage Australia
Title of the redirect is the username of a user on the forum given by the target of the redirect. Wongm (talk) 06:22, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Redirects to User:Doczilla/Template:Uw-vandalism4x
- Template:uw-vand4x → User:Doczilla/Template:Uw-vandalism4x
- Template:uw-vandal4x → User:Doczilla/Template:Uw-vandalism4x
- Template:uw-vandalism4x → User:Doczilla/Template:Uw-vandalism4x
- Template:uw-v4x → User:Doczilla/Template:Uw-vandalism4x
"You have been reported" templates have been
]- That's previous consensus over a template that's not the same thing. Let the discussion over the new template proceed before addressing its redirects. While discussion is in progress[1] this is premature, and this is not the place to discuss the merits of the template itself. Doczilla (talk) 10:42, 4 February 2008 (UTC) P. S. Couldn't you have done these as one group nomination instead of four separate nominations?
- Comment:I went ahead and combined the above nominations. The text of all four discussions was basically identical (see?) an there was no need for separate discussions. — Gavia immer (talk) 14:34, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, not because of any issue with the target (that would be an issue for MfD), but because redirects from template space to userspace are generally the wrong thing to do, especially if someone has objected. — Gavia immer (talk) 14:34, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete no foreseeable consensus for these. If there is, then move to template space rather than have misleading redirects. –Pomte 16:11, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - these are in userspace rather than template space for a reason - that reason being that these templates should not be used. --Hyperbole (talk) 23:06, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Don't delete the targets here - as Gavia immer said, that's an issue for MfD. However, the redirects from template space to user space should be deleted. Bart133 (t) (c) 17:12, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Pixie (F.O.P.) → The Fairly OddParents#Characters and Cast
procedural nomination, found
Sanjay (The Fairly oddParents) → The Fairly OddParents#Characters_and_Cast
procedural nomination, found