Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 26

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

August 26

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on August 26, 2019.

Thai Empire

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 September 10#Thai Empire

Residences

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget. --BDD (talk) 18:42, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seems that this redirecting to

WP:SURPRISE, and this should probably be retargeted to Residence as a {{R from plural}}. Steel1943 (talk) 23:24, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

  • At the time that this redirect was created, I also redirect Residence to dwelling. The current page at that title is merely a collection of synonyms for "dwelling". There should be a single article on the concept of the place where one resides/dwells/lives, whatever it is called. bd2412 T 23:45, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget per nom. This should point to residence, as long as we have an article there. If residence becomes a redirect again, then this (obviously) will be retargeted. - Eureka Lott 23:52, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to residence per above comment. Oz\InterAct 06:59, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete; alternatively, Retarget per nom. Arguably a retarget is not required; editors can just use "[[residence]]s", but it's harmless. I note that the subjects of the articles Residence and Dwelling are two different concepts, at least today. "Residence" is about where one lives; "dwelling" appears to be about the legal significance of a building in which an individual lives as it is used in, for example, the definition of various crimes such as burglary (i.e., breaking and entering into a factory or other non-dwelling is distinguished from breaking and entering into a dwelling). TJRC (talk) 21:48, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

EconomicS

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. A good history lesson and a good explanation why its okay for CamelCase redirects to be unused. -- Tavix (talk) 19:55, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused CamelCase redirect Lmatt (talk) 23:09, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. @
Unprintworthy redirects}} as most folks wouldn't even notice them. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 23:43, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Last Night (2009 film)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:38, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This film was released in 2010 and not in 2009. I do not see a reason to keep this redirect anymore, and it could cause some confusion about the movie's release date. The redirect does not have any history that would be worth preserving either.

Aoba47 (talk) 20:37, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Drill DOzer

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 00:02, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per

WP:PANDORA. Unnecessary as Wikipedia search already corrects such errors. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 20:39, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 17:26, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Animal crossing review

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 18:36, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Page was created as, well, someone's review. But it makes no sense to point here, or anywhere, since

WP:NOTESSAY. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 03:30, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 17:24, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as I doubt anyone will actually type this in the search bar. While I understand Geolodus' suggestion, there is a certain level of ambiguity in the phrase "Animal crossing review". It could certainly reference reviews for the first game, but it would also indicate reviews for the follow-ups or reviews of the franchise as a whole.
    Aoba47 (talk) 20:39, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Funding agencies

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was
WP:ATD option, which is usually how I handle trainwrecks. Finally, there is no prejudice against speedy individual renomination if anyone wants to discuss a certain redirect in more detail. -- Tavix (talk) 20:08, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

None of these terms are specific to science: funding agencies, bodies, opportunities etc. also exist in the humanities and other disciplines. We probably ought to have an article on

WP:RDEL #10 applies. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 22:27, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BDD (talk) 17:12, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lendia (tree)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Justification provided, withdrawing nomination.
(non-admin closure) signed, Rosguill talk 17:56, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Not clear what the purpose of this redirect is. "Lendia" is not mentioned in the target, nor is any close permutation of it. Internet and google scholar searches didn't turn up any meaningful results. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 17:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Not sure if google searches are tailored according to users previous searches or not, but on my computer "Lagerstroemia parviflora AND Lendia" lists many useful pages.
The name Lendia is a Hindi word for Lagerstroemia parviflora. Other (latinized) Hindi words for the same plant are Dhaura, Bakli, and Sidi. If your google search does not give any useful hits, try to have a look at this particular page: Small Flowered Crape Myrtle at Flowers of India. RhinoMind (talk) 17:10, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the comment, this justification is good enough for me. Withdrawing the nomination. signed, Rosguill talk 17:56, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Oven Toast Grill

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:43, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New redirect to bad target (dab). Not mentioned in the dab, and no obvious target. Capitalisation also bad. Widefox; talk 16:19, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. This redirect is unhelpful and may cause confusion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:33, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

KAPR

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:44, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

KAPR is an AM station in Douglas, AZ. KVOI is an AM station in Tucson, AZ. I don't see any connection between the two nor any reason for this redirect. Recommend delete to turn this back red. MB 16:14, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Libya Gate

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:44, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused redirect unrelated to topic. See Talk:LSE–Gaddafi affair#"Libya Gate is the name given to a scandal" Lmatt (talk) 16:00, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cut Man V

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:44, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A pair of fairly useless and nonsensical redirects created by a user who specializes in vandalism through redirects. One is, as far as I can tell, a fan character (possibly created by the redirect creator), the other, as far as I can tell, does not exist. In both cases, these are worthless as redirects. Rorshacma (talk) 15:59, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think we can keep these redirects because Bowsette is a fan-made concept for a character, and Cut Man V is to. Also I didn't create Cut Man V, he was created by SesakaTH in 2009. [deviantart.com/marioshi64/art/CutMan-V-Trade-154243032 Here's an image of him.] Kaithehedgefox (talk) 18:41, 27 August 2019 (UTC)kaithehedgefoxKaithehedgefox (talk) 18:41, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete not mentioned in the article.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 16:06, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, if we add information about Cut Man V in the List of Mega Man characters, then we can keep the redirects. Kaithehedgefox (talk) 20:18, 28 August 2019 (UTC)kaithehedgefoxKaithehedgefox (talk) 20:18, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Only if there is enough reliable coverage for this particular fan character.--67.68.29.90 (talk) 21:54, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not covered in the target article and there is no evidence that reliable sources have shown interest in this particular fan creation. Finally, the fact thst Bowsette is covered doesn’t mean mean that all fan characters deserve coverage, each one needs to be decided on their own merits.--67.68.29.90 (talk) 21:54, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Make the World Greta Again

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 18:34, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Created by the same user as

talk) 15:50, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Between the Vice special by this title and the film documentary by this title, I'm going to retarget the redir on the article itself rather than just the section about her prizes and awards.
NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 17:48, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
NewsAndEventsGuy wait but that's where the mention is, so I'm not sure this suggestion is appropriate. signed, Rosguill talk 17:53, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
FYI, I've started listing sources at the redirect's talk page.
NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 18:45, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

pinging the sole remaining delete vote,

Crossroads1 signed, Rosguill talk 06:03, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

If it is in that kind of use, then I guess it should be a retarget to her article as a whole.
talk) 14:26, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
Agree, someone please close with retarget instructions
NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 21:08, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
While I think we have a consensus to keep the redirect, I don't think there's a consensus of whether the redirect should point at the article or a section. I for one think that the current section targeting is appropriate, as it is the only place in the article that the film Make the World Greta Again is mentioned. signed, Rosguill talk 21:56, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Boomerang (2018 film)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:44, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It did not release in 2018. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:19, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hevatt-Packard

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:44, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Hevatt" is an unlikely misspelling of "Hewlett". OxiClean Versatile Laundry Stain Remover (talk) 04:32, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I have added the deletion notice to the redirect as the nominator did not do so, and fixed the stats link. Both the nominator and the creator of the redirect are currently indefinitely blocked (for different reasons). –Sonicwave talk 17:16, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: This doesn't seem too plausible to be searched (two incorrect letters and a missing "L"), and stats show that the redirect had 77 pageviews since it was created in November 2017. –Sonicwave talk 17:16, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – Obvious misspellings like this are not helpful. Senator2029 “Talk” 18:11, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Infected Mushies

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:45, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not entirely evident that the band has been referred to by this name. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 04:16, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

GIMP 2.10.6

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 September 16#GIMP 2.10.6

File:Torontogirl.jpg.JPG

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 September 10#File:Torontogirl.jpg.JPG

Wikipedia:WhyArentThesePagesCopyedited

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 September 10#Wikipedia:WhyArentThesePagesCopyedited

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019_August_26&oldid=1088037247"