Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 10

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

March 10

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 10, 2022.

IPhone 8 (2nd generation)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:00, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think this redirect page is unnecessary. Hajoon0102 💬 23:18, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

OIIIIIIIO

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:59, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It appears pageviews suggests that there have only been 29 pageviews of this article during its entire history. The redirect doesn't appear to be something most people are actually going to use. Does this need to exist? ActuallyNeverHappened02 (a place to chalk | a list of stuff i've done) 22:11, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak delete. The title is an ASCII representation of a Jeep grille and headlamps, so I can see why it was created. However, it doesn't seem encyclopedic and is hardly a plausible search term. --Sable232 (talk) 22:17, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, not a nonsense redirect but doesn't seem plausible, only search results for the term is an Urban Dictionary entry and social media, which make it clear that it represents Jeep. Bonoahx (talk) 23:00, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I would personally discourage using ASCII pictograms as redirects. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 08:47, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of leap years

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 17:20, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is no list of leap years anywhere on the target page, so this redirect should be deleted.

talk) 18:19, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Nor should there be. Delete as pointless. --
talk) 19:27, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

N,

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 17#N,

G.D. Goenka School and G.d goenka. public school

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 17#G.D. Goenka School and G.d goenka. public school

The revolution of farmers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of peasant revolts. Liz Read! Talk! 16:28, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

R from move leftover from the page's early history, when it stood at this title for ten days following creation, before being renamed. There's probably a better target, but I'm not sure what that would be. If one isn't identified, deletion would be best. Paul_012 (talk) 14:05, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Loveleen Mishra

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:59, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hum Log is a DAB page, and a useless target. Loveleen Mishra is an actress who has appeared in

Hum Log (television series), but also elsewhere; see her IMDb entry. Delete, to encourage article creation if justified. Narky Blert (talk) 13:20, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pneumoultramicroscopicsilicanovolcanoconiosis

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:41, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Currently redirects to

WP:CIRCULAR, from an Italian-language version of Longest word in English. Bonoahx (talk) 12:29, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Golden orb

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Jay (talk) 11:23, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect may refer to other things, like Maya the Bee: The Golden Orb or an object of the same name mentioned in either Part 3 (Twin Peaks) or Dragon Quest V. George Ho (talk) 11:12, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, just convert it to a dab page; no need for discussion. Peter coxhead (talk) 11:44, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mercedes-Benz CLT-Class

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 17#Mercedes-Benz CLT-Class

Conjuration

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was procedurally closed. The redirect can't be retargeted to the dab page because of
(non-admin closure) – Uanfala (talk) 23:39, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

I changed the redirect target for Conjuration from Evocation to Conjuration (disambiguation). User:MB reverted this change on the grounds that the Hatnotes in Evocation indicate Evocation is the primary target, and any change needs to be discussed. Note that: 1. Conjuration (disambiguation) (which I have not changed) already lists uses of the term other than Evocation of spirits. 2. The Wiktionary definitions of Conjuration include uses other than Evocation of spirits. I think my change was correct, and in addition the Hatnotes for Evocation may also need to be changed. Masato.harada (talk) 11:05, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Start a requested move. If you propose that there is no primary topic for Conjuration, then the way to reach consensus on that is to propose moving Conjuration (disambiguation) to Conjuration. The base term should not be a redirect to a page with a (disambiguation) qualifier. Mdewman6 (talk) 20:15, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • WP:ROBIN swap. Narky Blert (talk) 21:09, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mercedes-Benz T-Class

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 17#Mercedes-Benz T-Class

BlueHybrid

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Mercedes-Benz S-Class (W221)#S 400 Hybrid (2009–2013). Jay (talk) 11:18, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The only mention of any kind at the current target is a part of the model name

Mercedes-Benz S400 BlueHYBRID which itself is a redirect to Mercedes-Benz S-Class where the only mention is that same model name as a caption of a photo. Looking online it seems like this was the only "BlueHYBRID" model, and was only ever a prototype [1] and given the lack of recent articles I suppose it was abandoned. So potentially we could retarget to Mercedes-Benz S-Class but I would prefer deletion unless a better target can be found. A7V2 (talk) 10:49, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Fresh Produce

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 17#Fresh Produce

Dick pic program

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus for now. Perhaps a fruitful next step would be to
get consensus on whether or not there should be discussion of this topic at the article. This redirect seems to hinge on that question, although it's more suitable for the talk page because it's a content question therein. -- Tavix (talk) 20:14, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Seems to be derived from a joke featured on the television show Last Week Tonight with John Oliver, shown here. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 06:22, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@
Dick Pic Program’, the bad news is they are still collecting everybody’s information. Including the dick pics.” The confusion is certainly there. ‑‑ K (🗪 | ✍) 12:44, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:38, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete due to lack of mention at the target. * Pppery * it has begun... 05:04, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep due to a prominent mention on a popular tv show and sourced quote from Snowden. It doesn't need a mention in the article, it just needs to be useful for someone searching for information... and it is certainly plausible that someone would have seen the John Oliver episode, but not be able to remember the real and official name, given that "Dick pic program" is so memorable in comparison. Redirects are cheap, and this one is pretty unambiguous. Fieari (talk) 07:22, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No mention at the target. Implausible search term, with little or no pageviews. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 09:30, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Pppery and CX Zoom: “No mention at the target” is really a non-issue. It can easily be fixed. ‑‑ K (🗪 | ✍) 11:28, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    You've added one sentence that lacks necessary context and screams of undue weight. I guess as long as that content exists the redirect should be kept (and refined to
    make a point, rather than a legitimate part of the article. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:14, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Kai Burghardt has added a mention at the target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 05:52, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. The addition to the target page seems, per Pppery, POINTy, and I'd revert it as
    SYNTH but there's a bit of a Gordian Knot between the useful addition of the Smith reference and the unhelpful, SYNTHy John Oliver stuff. Regardless, for our purposes at RfD, the poorly-worded addition doesn't make clear if a "dick pic program" is a real thing (Smith, invoking Snowden, says it isn't), so I don't think this is a suitable mention to redirect readers to. It would serve to confuse rather than to educate, and we are above all else educators here. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 19:18, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    My point was, it is not a requirement for a
    Dick pic program as spam or counterproductive to the goals of an encyclopedia, I think it’s best to simply keep it. ‑‑ K (🗪 | ✍) 19:10, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wine cats

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:48, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fear not, my last of the day. "Wine cats" could refer to a number of things, such as this book. It's

surprising for this combination of two common words to instead link to an obscure projectspace subpage. No backlinks, low pageviews, and of course no way to know if readers visiting this link found what they were looking for. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 05:24, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Porn Project

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:48, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is

surprising redirect. "Porn Project" refers to a number of things, most notably a Christian anti-pornography group. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 05:20, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ukraine Wikiproject

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:47, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only WikiProject cross-namespace shortcut of the format "X Wikiproject" or "X WikiProject". As that link shows, XNRs to WikiProjects are quite rare to begin with. Any "Wikiproject:" or "WikiProject:" pseudonamespace has been conclusively ruled out by past RfDs (see documentation here), and I think "X Wikiproject" or "X WikiProject" should be treated the same, as the alternative would be opening the door to thousands of such XNRs. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 05:16, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Poor cross-namespace redirect likely to pollute autocomplete/search results. --Paul_012 (talk) 06:40, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. The mainspace and the rest of WP should be kept separated as much as possible. Veverve (talk) 15:01, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete this unnecessary cross-namespace redirect. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:52, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Teleaid

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 17#Teleaid

Q Wiki Club

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:47, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This XNR related to a GLAM program may have served some benefit when it was created, but isn't of any use now that the club is (apparently) no more. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 04:45, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks for alerting on this - most Project class items related to the Wikipedia and Wikimedia projects in states of Australia - even where they may currently apparently no longer utilised have been kept (where possible) in archived form where possible - as a record of the activities held by the project(s) - so utilitarian concerns to date have been sublimated (so to speak) by the need to complement any metrics required by outside bodies as to the ups and downs and sideways of the projects and events. Where possible we keep the most trivial 'paper trails' for good purpose - that said and the commendable offering of a page view in the nomination (more power to the process of checking such items!) maybe in the end we dont need it - but as I am on the other side of this hot/wet continent - the more relevant editor might just be https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kerry_Raymond... JarrahTree 04:57, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete non-encyclopedic
    WP:XNR . If this was encyclopedically notable, it'd have an encyclopedic article. Otherwise, it should be using WP:Q Wiki Club -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 06:49, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Delete this unnecessary cross-namespace redirect. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:52, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Paulo Correa

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:46, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A section in a poorly-maintained, poorly-formatted projectspace page quoting some (unsourced!) mean things this person said about Wikipedia is not a good usage of a cross-namespace redirect, and in fact poses serious

BLP concerns. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 04:39, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

ASPERSIONS

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedily deleted by Anthony Bradbury under the
(non-admin closure) -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 16:48, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Created with the summary ix broken link. I can only assume that someone somewhere had linked to this instead of

WP:COSTLY, hence I'd prefer to delete. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 04:35, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Canned edit summary

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 17#Canned edit summary

2005 Britannica takeover of Wikimedia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:45, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cross-namespace redirect to a humor page. Its appearance in the search bar, Special:AllPages, etc., as a mainspace page is actively misleading, as it implies that this is a thing that happened, or might have happened, or at least an encyclopedically notable hoax. N.B.: This page has been deleted five times before, but never by a consensus discussion. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 04:16, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom, no problems with deletion here. Graham87 14:34, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete this unnecessary cross-namespace redirect. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:53, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

André Konsbruck

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:51, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target, doesn't appear he ever was mentioned there, and is currently not mentioned anywhere else, nor do I feel any mention is justified anywhere. This is a former article that was BLARed by David Gerard after removing some problematic sources. Looking at the last version of this [2] before the BLAR I don't think we should be restoring a BLP to a state where the only two "sources" are just photos. I definitely think delete. A7V2 (talk) 03:36, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, I concur - a redirect or article can be created as and when there's material - David Gerard (talk) 08:52, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Audi Q6

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 17#Audi Q6

Brain Sucker

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. As a term with several usages which are better reflected in search results. While there was agreement that a disambiguation page was possible with limited entries, there was no support for a disambiguation page that covered the scope of the search results. Jay (talk) 20:05, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear/vague redirect. Brainsuckers are enemies in Bloodborne for example. Should be deleted to allow the use of the search function. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 01:10, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: A disambig draft will help to see if there is support for disambiguation.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay (talk) 03:31, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment there's also the brain bug from Starship Troopers, with the meme "They sucked his brains out" -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 06:09, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:21, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more go…
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 02:47, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. This is a case where there is no topic/article that adequately identifies a subject by this name, and search results would be more useful than a disambiguation page, especially if additional articles unrelated to the ones mentioned thus far mention a subject by this name. Steel1943 (talk) 22:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ukraine Is Not Yet Dead

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep.
(non-admin closure) eviolite (talk) 03:09, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

This page was tagged as an implausible redirect and it is the translated title of a national anthem. I thought the editors at

WP:RFD would be the best judges of whether it was indeed implausible. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:43, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

  • While the target article translates the title as "The glory and freedom of Ukraine has not yet perished", "Ukraine has not yet perished" for short, this translation does see some currency, and the title-case capitalization is reasonable enough given that it's the title of a work. Thus, keep, and I'd say create those two redlinks as well as appropriate title-/sentence-case variants of all three. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 02:58, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • i tagged it... it is not accurate translation of the current title simply a misnomer. further the enter first page of google hits are from the last week indicating possible cito-genesis in the top hits—blindlynx 05:09, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    (Much of) the first page of Google hits is from the past few weeks because the whole world developed a great interest in Ukrainian politics and culture in the past few weeks. (I wonder why.) This isn't citogenesis, though. See this from October 2020, for instance. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 15:37, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't mean in general but specifically in terms of renewed interest and it having been the title of a wiki article for the better part of a day. In general it's just a miss-translation, and i don't think it qualifies as a common miss-translation outside of people seeing it on here in the last week—blindlynx 16:13, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    It's common enough that a major academic institution used it for the name of a conference. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 16:32, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: A quick Google (web and book) search reveal that the title is in common usage. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 07:49, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: It's a logical redirect and that translation is found regularly in English text long before the recent war. (A Google Scholar search turns up two pages of results, including an instance from 1936.) —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 16:46, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: For reference, other redirects to the current target are
    The glory and freedom of Ukraine has not yet died
    .
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

S/b/:Ralston Bowles

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:40, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another weird "s/b/:" one (see

A10. Jamie7687, in redirecting it, said this redirect should probably be deleted. Well, 16 years later, let's make that happen. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 01:18, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

S/b/:Hydropolis

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:40, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is the result of a pagemove from a nonsensical title four minutes after the page was created in 2005. Sixteen years later, I do not think it serves any purpose. It gets some pageviews, but not enough to give cause to believe that any humans are deliberately navigating to this redirect. Given the existence of S/b/:Ralston Bowles as well, I asked Graham87 if he was aware of any old MediaWiki things that could explain how these two pages were created, and he was as stumped as me. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 01:18, 10 March 2022 (UTC) c/e 14:39, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Graham87 14:35, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. It was the old name and after I moved the page, I kept it as a redirect as usual. It didn't serve a purpose other than the history but I agree to deleting it. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:50, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

JCK (disambiguation)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was moot: target has been restored as a dab page. (non-admin closure) – Uanfala (talk) 14:45, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Target is no longer a DAB and nothing links here. Dan Bloch (talk) 01:03, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_March_10&oldid=1079441135"