Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 12

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

April 12

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 12, 2023.

-mas

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft redirect to
(non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 23:53, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Unhelpful, nonsensical. I propose deletion. Veverve (talk) 23:12, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ending with "-mas" doesn't necessarily mean being suffixed with "-mas". Most of the words listed in the provided link, if not every single one, end with "-ma" in their singular form, with the "-s" plural ending added. While they end with "-mas", they do not use the "-mas" suffix. People searching for "-mas" would primarily search for the suffix in particular rather than just every single word ending with "-mas", similarly to how the -s article only points towards the two English endings that consist entirely of "-s", rather than all words or suffixes that end with "-s". Randi Moth TalkContribs 12:32, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete …what? Dronebogus (talk) 19:24, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: if there is no consensus at the end of the day, but that most votes are not for keeping, the redirect should not be kept as is. What is to be done (as of now, either soft redirect or deletion) is up to the closer. Veverve (talk) 17:34, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Typically alternatives to deletion are preferred over deletion, so a no-consensus would likely mean the soft redirect, unless another alternative surfaces. Randi Moth TalkContribs 22:50, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
I’d support that, though I usually support the “common reader’s likely response” option first, which is why I voted “delete” as confusing. Dronebogus (talk) 00:08, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Vix Pervenit: On Usury and Other Dishonest Profit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep.
(non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 23:47, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Made up title, no mention at the target. Therefore, I propose deletion. Veverve (talk) 22:59, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Usury and Catholicism

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:49, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The topic is broader than this, and has likely seen significant development in the last three centuries. Therefore, the target is misleading. Furthermore,

WP:REDYES, so that an article (like one exists for Judaism at Loans and interest in Judaism
) can be created.
Thus, I propose deletion, Veverve (talk) 22:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete weird reverse
WP:COATRACK— projecting nonexistent content onto the closest match to the nonexistent content. Dronebogus (talk) 00:09, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

L∞

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to
(non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 21:42, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

L-infinity seems like a more relevant target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 19:09, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Battle of Peshawar

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. wbm1058 (talk) 16:20, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such battle named "Battle of Peshawar" which took place in 1758. However, "Capture of Peshawar" did take place which is the existing title of the article. "Battle of Peshawar" redirecting to Capture of Peshawar (1758) may confuse our readers who may get misled to believe that such a battle took place. Therefore, this redirection should better be deleted. Dympies (talk) 18:59, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then what to do with
Battle of Peshawar (1758)? Ponken (talk) 20:31, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Bare urls

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:49, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary

WP:STRIKESOCK Duckmather (talk) 04:26, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Unnecessary. Also who knows if such a term will come to be used outside WP. And even though at times I have wished I could find WP-editing info through mainspace. But then that should be implemented consistently throughout, possibly by bot. Ponken (talk) 20:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: the mainspace and the rest of WP should be kept separated. Veverve (talk) 22:40, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Suprisingly, there does not seem to be any encyclopedic mention of this anywhere, and this doesn't seem useful enough to mandate a CNR. Interestingly, this seems to have been nominated by a sock of the creator... {{ping|ClydeFranklin}} (t/c) 01:04, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. The only mention I can find in mainspace is at clean URL. Retargeting there doesn't seem helpful to readers since it only mentions the term without explaining what it means. 59.149.117.119 (talk) 04:55, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Wikipedia:Obversion

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
Since the page move was reverted, this discussion is now moot. Anyone wishing to delete the essay may take it to
MfD. (non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 (T·C) 09:57, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Unnecessary cross-namespace redirect Dronebogus (talk) 17:54, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@
WP:STRIKESOCK Duckmather (talk) 04:26, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
* Keep and return to WP space: I don't see anything that can be even slightly construed as an attack. The essay merely proposes an alternative consensus process to
WP:BRD. I was going to move it back myself, but I can't. Possibly because I made a mistake and got the namespace wrong on my first attempt. Larataguera (talk) 14:22, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
So I guess I might be promoting deletion of the redirect so that I can move the essay back. Larataguera (talk) 14:36, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I found this article in User space and returned the essay to its original location. I don't understand why it was moved without discussing it with the page creator. Liz Read! Talk! 23:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Draft:Wikipedia:Competence is desired

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
Since the page move was reverted, this discussion is now moot. Anyone wishing to delete the essay may take it to
MfD. (non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 (T·C) 09:57, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Unnecessary cross-namespace redirect Dronebogus (talk) 17:53, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Draft:Wikipedia:Wiki-Dwarf

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus leaning towards "keep". There is at least no consensus that there's anything particularly wrong with the draft in the history under the redirect.
(non-admin closure) – Uanfala (talk) 12:14, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Unnecessary cross-namespace redirect Dronebogus (talk) 17:53, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:STRIKESOCK Duckmather (talk) 04:26, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Wikipedia:Bold-refine

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
Since the page move was reverted, this discussion is now moot. Anyone wishing to delete the essay may take it to
MfD. (non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 (T·C) 09:56, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Unnecessary cross-namespace redirect Dronebogus (talk) 17:52, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@
WP:STRIKESOCK Duckmather (talk) 04:26, 14 April 2023 (UTC) [reply
]
* Return to Wikipedia space: The essay had a few passages that were unnecessarily critical of established editors. I have removed those, and I don't see any reason to get rid of this essay. I was going to move it back myself, but I can't. Possibly because I made a mistake on my first attempt and got the namespace wrong. Larataguera (talk) 14:26, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So I guess I might actually be promoting deletion of the redirect so that I can move the essay back. Haha. Larataguera (talk) 14:35, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Wikipedia:WikiProject Abandoned Drafts/Anatoly Kvochur

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:52, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:STRIKESOCK. Duckmather (talk) 19:27, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Blue Protocol

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of Bandai Namco video games#Blue Protocol. signed, Rosguill talk 17:01, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I want this page deleted because the redirect name is not mentioned in the target article. 99.209.40.250 (talk) 15:52, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Fire Emblem 17

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 16:59, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target, see below. QuicoleJR (talk) 13:58, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. It says it's the sequel to Fire Emblem: Three Houses, and that page says it's the 16th in the series. This is not a keep !vote for FE17 below, which could have other possible meanings. HotdogPi 19:30, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep It's generally considered the 17th in the series. The Fire Emblem series has always never been numbered officially, but it's a believable search. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:17, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

FE17

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 19#FE17

Userspace draft

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Arguments thus far show several editors in favor of keep or delete, respectively, with minimal prospect for reaching a consensus. Given that circumstance, and that the nominator was blocked as a sockpuppet, I think closing this discussion now without prejudice to future renomination is appropriate. signed, Rosguill talk 16:59, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unneeded

WP:STRIKESOCK Duckmather (talk) 04:26, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

User:Lowercase sigmabot III/config

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 22#User:Lowercase sigmabot III/config

Masacalla

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 19#Masacalla

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_April_12&oldid=1151181662"