Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 11

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

April 11

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 11, 2023.

Doctor Destroyer

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Oops (non-admin closure) * Pppery * it has begun... 00:01, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:50, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - the character is actually mentioned twice there. BOZ (talk) 00:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Buddhism and other religions

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 19#Buddhism and other religions

College Heights Historic District (Durham, North Carolina)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 16:55, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The historic district isn't mentioned in the target article. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 23:07, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Page now redirects to National Register of Historic Places listings in Durham County, North Carolina. Speedy keep and close, IMO. ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:12, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure that's a helpful redirect either, since the only link to the title is from that very list. (In theory the subject should have its own article, like most of the other entries in the list, but for the time being I think a redlink is better than a redirect.) TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 23:14, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I tried removing the self-redirect but I don't know enough about {{NRHP row}} to do that. I have sought comment at Template talk:NRHP row#"No article" option needed, and row anchor. Jay 💬 06:46, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:REDYES or useful as-is?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 21:55, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

WWikipedia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep.
(non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 01:03, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Unlikely typo. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:15, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't think all of these views resulted from clicking What redirects here, thus keep as a probably-used misspelling. J947 † edits 04:27, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep reduplication is a very common form of typo. This seems to be a stick key error, as it is capitalized -- 65.92.244.249 (talk) 22:43, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I can't find any Wikipedia policy/guideline regarding redirects from typos. In the absence of such a policy, I think such redirects are pointless. I'd support keeping redirects from common misspellings (like
    tyrany, for instance), but this type of reduplication "typo" can literally be applied to any page. Like, for example "FFrance", "JJoe Biden" etc. Satellizer el Bridget (Talk) 14:26, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    • WP:R#CRD is broader but definitely applicable. Yes, it could be applied to any page but it stands to reason that the more popular an article is, the more helpful such a redirect will be. Wikipedia receives a lot of pageviews. J947 † edits 20:22, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
      ]
Thanks for the links, I wasn't aware of RPURPOSE. Just for the record for the closing admin, I wouldn't consider this a likely misspelling per my argument above so my position remains at delete Satellizer el Bridget (Talk) 06:17, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Agree with nom and Satellizer on the unlikely misspelling, but Keep per pageviews per J947. Revisit a year later. Jay 💬 09:22, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 21:45, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep based on pageviews and the fact it isn't harmful. Skynxnex (talk) 01:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Wikipedia fork

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. While a retarget to
List of Wikipedia forks deletion is preferable. signed, Rosguill talk 16:54, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Mentioned in passing a few times, but not really discussed at the target. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:09, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 21:44, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all per nom. To say there is a passing mention is very charitable. There is no good retarget. Veverve (talk) 18:37, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Bishnupuriya Utsab

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio giuliano 20:33, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It needs to be deleted because the target article contains virtually no information on the subject. Haoreima (talk) 10:29, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For an opinion on the pre-redirect page history.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 08:04, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep There's some information on the festival so named. It's a reasonable search term and the target article discusses the subject. That's sufficient. --Jayron32 12:30, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 21:43, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. I'm not seeing the subject being discussed at the target, as Jayron32 states above. So better to delete this, due to a lack of mention. CycloneYoris talk! 01:07, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The target has a passing mention of a "Bishnupur Utsav" (plausibly spelt also with a final -b). This mention may or may not remain in the article, but even if it does, it's too minor to be worth having redirects for. And we don't: these two redirects feature an unusual form (Bishnupuriya), and the second one additionally has an implausible typo (Ustav). – Uanfala (talk) 13:00, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Uanfala. Looking at the page history, it does look like test edits by
    Bishnupuriya. Jay 💬 07:38, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Legazpi Boulevard

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 19#Legazpi Boulevard

Manir

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 19#Manir

Dutoprol

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 16:33, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

☒N Delete. It is a misleading redirect. Dutoprol is a

combination medication that consists of metoprolol succinate and hydrochlorothiazide
, so the target (metoprolol) is very different from title of the redirect.

Also, deletion of the redirect will encourage article creation. — CrafterNova [ TALK ] [ CONT ] 16:57, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Galatic Republic (Star Wars)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 19#Galatic Republic (Star Wars)

Sonic Boom (Sonic the Hedgehog 2 mod)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:57, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the target. Even after searching extensively on Google, I still don’t really know what this mod is. Yes the term “Sonic Boom” is mentioned in the target; however, the term in the target is referring to a Sonic 1 rom hack, not a Sonic 2 rom hack. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 12:51, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - if it's that hard to find a source, it's unlikely to be mentioned at the article, which operates on the bare minimum of following
    WP:V as inclusion criteria. Sergecross73 msg me 13:06, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Delete per nom. Veverve (talk) 22:52, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Genital sex

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 22#Genital sex

Deportations during the Great Depression

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per author request. ✗plicit 13:32, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete

WP:RED I don't think the current target is appropriate, as deportations are a greater topic than the Mexican explusion. There were a massive wave of deportations in Canada [1] unrelated to the U.S. deportation of Mexicans covered at the target. The local authorities also deported out-of-state people back out of the state.[2] Thus I think this should remain on the missing articles list, for someone in the future to write, instead of being a redirect created to clear an entry at the missing articles list. -- 64.229.90.172 (talk) 06:53, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Arthur Fleck Wayne

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed, Rosguill talk 05:55, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is not the character's full name, and the narrative reveals he is not related to Thomas Wayne. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:20, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep {{
    R from avoided double redirect|Arthur Fleck}} -- and it is not revealed that he is not a Wayne in the film. The film's Thomas Wayne claims he is not the father, while the Fleck's mother claims he is. There is no elucidating flashback to the conception moment with a different man, so it falls within the film's very misleading narrator ethic, as not everything presented in the film is happening, whether it is with Thomas Wayne or any other incident. -- 65.92.244.249 (talk) 23:46, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 20:47, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 06:07, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Mindfulness relaxation

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep.
(non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 00:50, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Unlikely search term with very few page views (0 in the last 30 days). No incoming links from mainspace. — 

talk · contribs · he/him] 04:33, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Mindfulness can lead to relaxation as well as things like self-knowledge and wisdom. So, having a separate page for the relaxation part would be quite unnecessary in my opinion. Nandinik (talk) 20:08, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, 27 pageviews in the last one year. Useful to some, harmful to none. Jay 💬 07:24, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Brainwasher (Gerhard Winkler)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 05:54, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:20, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Fusion (Marvel Comics)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of Marvel Comics characters: F. signed, Rosguill talk 05:54, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:20, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Legion of Losers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 05:54, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:20, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - I added a mention in the appropriate section. BOZ (talk) 17:58, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Since a mention was added. CycloneYoris talk! 04:25, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Fifth Column (V franchise)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 05:53, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:00, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Null the Living Darkness

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy retarget to List of Marvel Comics characters: N#Null. BD2412 T 18:45, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to a disambiguation page that doesn't disambiguate this term. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:42, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Disruptor (comics)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 20#Disruptor (comics)

Ch'al Andar

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 05:53, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Does not appear to be mentioned in any of the lists listed at the target. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:31, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Skyshroud

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 18#Skyshroud

Urborg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 05:52, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:45, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Corondor

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 05:52, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:45, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Aerona

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 05:51, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:45, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Llanowar

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 05:51, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:45, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Benalia

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 18#Benalia

Wildfire (Magic: the Gathering)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 18#Wildfire (Magic: the Gathering)

The plane

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to
(non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 04:07, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

No reason for this to refer to the target over any of plane's other meanings. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:45, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Tapatalk

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 5#Tapatalk

Domovideo

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to
(non-admin closure) – Uanfala (talk) 12:11, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

wrong redirect, not in use,

not notable Telco4 (talk) 08:49, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 02:31, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect to Mediaset where mentioned. signed, Rosguill talk 05:50, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget to Mediaset per Rosguill, and since it's no longer mentioned at the current target. CycloneYoris talk! 00:54, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

River Styx (Dungeons & Dragons)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to
(non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 04:04, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:23, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Avernus (Dungeons and Dragons)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 18#Avernus (Dungeons and Dragons)

Modrons

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget.
(non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 (T·C) 01:11, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:23, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget
Primus (Dungeons and Dragons) to List of Dungeons & Dragons deities#Primus, where there is more on the character. Daranios (talk) 14:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Retarget per Daranios. BOZ (talk) 18:04, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pppery, what do you think about the proposed retargeting? – Uanfala (talk) 12:51, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm not personally convinced that having this many redirects to what's essentially a bare list with very little content about each individual term is useful. But retargeting is at least a clear improvement over keeping as is, and the lists already have many similarly useless redirects, so it's probably best to ignore my concerns and just close as retarget. * Pppery * it has begun... 13:55, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Mercuria (Dungeons & Dragons)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 05:48, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:23, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - I added a mention to the article. BOZ (talk) 18:08, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, as mention has been added. Daranios (talk) 10:35, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep. Although the mention that was added is currently unsourced. CycloneYoris talk! 04:01, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Lunia (Dungeons & Dragons)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 05:48, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:23, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - I added a mention to the article. BOZ (talk) 18:08, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, as mention has been added. Daranios (talk) 10:35, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep. Same as above. Mention is currently unsourced. CycloneYoris talk! 04:02, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Panemonium (D&D)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 18#Panemonium (D&D)

White Kingdom

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 19#White Kingdom

Celestial emperor

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to
(non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 03:55, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:23, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Alternative theories of the Outer planes

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 18#Alternative theories of the Outer planes

Kaorti

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to
(non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 03:53, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:23, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Pazunia

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 18#Pazunia

Plane of Infinite Portals

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 18#Plane of Infinite Portals

Ephemera (Dungeons & Dragons)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to
(non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 03:45, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:23, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Negative Material Plane

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep.
(non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 03:44, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:23, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Etiene

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 18#Etiene

Region of Concrete Thought

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:06, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:39, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom., no good retarget. Veverve (talk) 18:39, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a deletion review
).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_April_11&oldid=1153249005"