Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 June 25

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Log
< June 24
June 26 >

June 25

Template:Stott family of Oldham

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:35, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single use template. I additionally think it should be converted to use one of our standard "family tree" templates, but I could not understand how to make those go... Izno (talk) 23:19, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Scandinavian military rank sidebar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete.

(non-admin closure) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 21:49, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Should be replaced by {{infobox military rank}}, which incorporates the desirable qualities of this template while being more generally informative and standardized. Izno (talk) 21:10, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Bodmin RailTrail

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:16, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and replaced by another rail template used on article it was created for. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:38, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 20:52, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Renaissance Pictures

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:23, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong use of template space to link films made by a production company. We don't list every work made by said company in template space rather leave it to categories for the respective articles. No article for the company exists as it has been deleted since January for lack of notability. Regardless, this template should not be here. Might be the only one like this. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:40, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 20:52, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per lacking a mainspace article. Izno (talk) 21:16, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Potential 2024 Repub Candidates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete under CSD G7, per author request below. Tollens (talk) 21:22, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I probably should have

G6'd this while it was still in mainspace. Whoops. Now it's in template space. It appears to be a {{#section}} (excerpt) of a section of an article. Zero transclusions. Unless the creator can give a good reason and a planned use for this template, I think deleting it makes sense. cc Tollens. –Novem Linguae (talk) 20:37, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

I apologize, I am new to the Wikipedia editing world and I made a mistake. I'll delete if I can and if I can't one of you guys can delete it. Apologies. IEditPolitics (talk) 20:55, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Infobox song contest/Turkvision Song Contest 2016

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:34, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sub-template for Template:Infobox song contest infobox to show map within infobox for a now-deleted article. Serves no purpose. Sims2aholic8 (talk) 19:27, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Turkvision Song Contest templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:33, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Templates no longer serve a purpose as all country articles have been deleted (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azerbaijan in the Turkvision Song Contest 2016; Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyumen Oblast in the Turkvision Song Contest; Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azerbaijan in the Turkvision Song Contest) and any remaining related redirects are currently going through RfD and are likely to also be deleted (Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 25#Xinjiang in the Turkvision Song Contest). Sims2aholic8 (talk) 19:02, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Indian footwear industry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:17, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Something not useful for a navbox. A navbox should not be a directory of companies. If someone browsing Wikipedia is looking for articles on footwear companies in a country that has an article, they can find it through the categories related to the subject. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:53, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 16:42, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:WISFrecruit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:05, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Entirely unused template for a taskforce that was deleted in 2011. AlexandraAVX (talk) 12:49, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The template is in fact transcluded. User:WikiCleanerMan, User:Pichpich, User:Lenticel, please review your comments in light of that fact.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 16:39, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As the taskforce is deleted, there is no more future need for this. Subst it to the talk pages it was used on then delete. Gonnym (talk) 20:08, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst and delete even if the task force still existed, this is the sort of user talk template that is typically substituted. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:08, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:Grandson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:41, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template created in an attempt by an editor to add a non-notable individual to a biography. —C.Fred (talk) 16:31, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:WikiProject U.S. Roads/state

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 08:15, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sub templates of Template:WikiProject U.S. Roads probably since this edit. Gonnym (talk) 08:18, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:2015 Munster Senior Football Championship bracket

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 05:34, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template only used on one page with no clear uses elsewhere; recommend substituting and deleting. fuzzy510 (talk) 02:38, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

Template:British Virgin Islands

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 July 2. Izno (talk) 05:34, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a deletion review
).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2023_June_25&oldid=1163264073"