Zymoseptoria tritici
Zymoseptoria tritici | |
---|---|
Zymoseptoria tritici on leaves of wheat | |
Scientific classification | |
Kingdom: | |
Phylum: | |
Class: | |
Subclass: | |
Order: | |
Family: | |
Genus: | |
Species: | Z. tritici
|
Binomial name | |
Zymoseptoria tritici (Roberge ex Desm.) Quaedvl. & Crous, (2011)
| |
Synonyms | |
Septoria curtisiana Sacc., (1884)[1] |
Zymoseptoria tritici, synonyms Septoria tritici, Mycosphaerella graminicola, is a species of
In 2011, Quaedvlieg et al. introduced a
Description
This fungus causes septoria tritici blotch of wheat, a disease characterized by necrotic blotches on the foliage.
Asexual state (
-
In vitro production of asexual fructifications (pycnidia; arrow) of Zymoseptoria tritici on wheat leaf extract agar.
-
Penetration of a wheat leaf stoma (arrow) by a pycnidiospore germ tube of Zymoseptoria tritici.
-
Colonization of the mesophyll tissue by an intercellular hypha (arrows) of Zymoseptoria tritici during the symptomless biotrophic phase of pathogenesis.
-
Initiation (arrow head) of a pycnidium of Zymoseptoria tritici in the substomatal cavity of a wheat leaf.
Sexual state (
Genetics
Zymoseptoria tritici represents an intriguing model for fundamental genetic studies of plant-pathogenic fungi.
Zymoseptoria tritici was the first species, in 2002, of the family Mycosphaerellaceae to have a
The first report of fully sequenced
A striking aspect of Zymoseptoria tritici genetics is the presence of many
A surprising feature of the Zymoseptoria tritici genome compared to other sequenced plant pathogens was that it contained very few genes for
Evolution
The fungus Zymoseptoria tritici has been a pathogen of wheat since host domestication 10,000–12,000 years ago in the
The emergence and "co-domestication" of Zymoseptoria tritici was associated with an
Life cycle
Zymoseptoria tritici overwinters as fruiting bodies on crop debris, mostly as pseudothecia (sexual fruiting bodies) but sometimes also some pycnidia (asexual fruiting bodies).
Primary inoculum requires wet conditions and cool temperatures of 50-68 °F.[19] Under appropriate environmental conditions, lesions are able to develop on infected leaves, and soon pycnidia begin to develop on the lesions.[19] The pycnidia appear as small dark dots on the lesions. From the pycnidia, conidiospores, the asexual spores of the fungus, are released. These asexual spores are dispersed via rain splash and are response for the secondary inoculum of this polycyclic disease cycle.[17] When the conidiospores are splashed onto leaves, they act similarly to ascospores and cause the development of foliar lesions. In addition to pycnidia, pseudothecia also develop within these lesions. Pycnidia and pseudothecia are the structures in which the fungus overwinters, and the cycle begins again.[citation needed]
Disease Management
Zymoseptoria tritici is a difficult fungus to
The most effective, economical, and simple method of Z. tritici management is planting
There are also cultural management strategies that may be effective, including regular rotation of crops, deep plowing, and late planting.[15] More specifically, rotating a recently infected field to any non-host crop can be useful in minimizing the amount of fungus present in the field. Planting winter wheat after the first ascospore flights in September is a way to reduce primary inoculum of winter wheat.[22]
Fungicide use often simply is not economical for Septoria Leaf Blotch. The rapid evolution of pathogen resistance to fungicides is a major barrier. Zymoseptoria tritici has
The last method of control for Zymoseptoria tritici is biological control using bacteria. Bacillus megaterium has been shown to cause about an 80% decrease in disease development in the trials done so far.[17] Pseudomonads are also a promising bacterial control option. A benefit to using pseudomonads or bacillus is that they are not harmed by most fungicides, so they can be used in combination with chemical controls.[17] However, resistant cultivars and cultural control methods for Zymoseptoria tritici are generally favored over chemical or biological control methods, mainly because of the high costs associated with biological control.[citation needed]
Disease Importance
The ascomycete fungus Zymoseptoria tritici causes septoria tritici blotch, a foliar disease of
Different areas of the world are currently trying different management strategies. For example, in the Nordic-Baltic region, one of the largest wheat-producing regions of the world, the use of fungicides has substantially increased wheat yields.[25] The fungicides that have been shown to be effective include quinone outside inhibitors (QoIs), which, like most fungicides, are expensive to apply in large quantities. As climate change begins to increase temperatures around the globe, Zymoseptoria tritici, along with many other fungal pathogens, is likely to show increased overwintering survival and therefore more substantial primary inocula.[26] The need for effective management techniques will become even more important as the prevalence of Septoria leaf blotch increases with climate change.[citation needed]
-
Typical infection caused by Zymoseptoria tritici of the primary leaf of a resistanthyphae.
-
(upper image) Typical symptoms of Zymoseptoria tritici on a primary seedling leaf of a highly susceptible wheat cultivar. (lower image) Typical response to Zymoseptoria tritici on a primary leaf of a highly resistant wheat cultivar.
-
Symptoms of Zymoseptoria tritici on a naturally infected adult plant flag leaf of wheat.
References
This article incorporates CC-BY-2.5 text from references[8][11][13][23]
- ^ Saccardo P. A. (1884). Syll. fung. (Abellini) 3: 561.
- ^ Desmazières J. B. H. J. (1842). "Neuvième notice sur quelques plantes cryptogames, la plupart inédites, récemment découvertes en France, et que vont paraître en nature dans la collection publiée par l’auteur". Annales Des Sciences Naturelles, Bot., sér. 2, 17: 91-118. page 107.
- ^ Berk. & Curtis M. A. (1874). N. Amer. Fung.: no. 441 bis.
- ^ Sprague R. & Johnson A. G. (1944). In: Sprague, Ore. St. Monog., Bot. 6: 32.
- ^ Fuckel (1865). Fungi rhenani exsic.: no. 1578.
- ^ Fuckel (1870). Jb. nassau. Ver. Naturk. 23-24: 101.
- ^ Schröter J. (1894). In: Cohn, "Kryptogamen-Flora von Schlesien" (Breslau) 3-2(9): 257-384. page 340.
- ^
- PMID 22025804.
- ^ "Zymoseptoria". Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Retrieved 24 March 2024.
- ^ .
- ^ a b Wiese, M.V. (1987). Compendium of wheat diseases. American Phytopathological Society. p. 124.
- ^
- PMID 12196395.
- ^ a b "Fungal Leaf Spot Diseases of Wheat: Tan spot, Septoria/Stagonospora nodorum blotch and Septoria tritici blotch — Publications". www.ag.ndsu.edu. Retrieved 2020-12-06.
- .
- ^ a b c d e f g "Septoria tritici blotch (STB) of wheat". Septoria tritici blotch (STB) of wheat. Retrieved 2020-12-06.
- ^ Henze M., Beyer M., Klink H. & Verreet J.-A. (2007). "Characterizing meteorological scenarios favorable for Septoria tritici infections in wheat and estimation of latent periods". Plant Disease 91: 1445-1449. [1]
- ^ a b Markell, Sam (26 October 2006). "Fungal Leaf-Spotting Diseases of Wheat: Septoria Blotch, Stagonospora Blotch and Tan Spot". University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture. Retrieved 6 December 2020.
- PMID 26092788.
- S2CID 218632778.
- ^ "Leaf Blotch Diseases of Wheat—Septoria tritici Blotch, Stagonospora nodorum Blotch and Tan Spot". ohioline.osu.edu. Retrieved 2020-12-06.
- ^ .
- S2CID 227181536.
- S2CID 220611931.
- ^ Cotuna, Otilia (2018). "Influence of Crop Management on the Impact of Zymoseptoria tritici in Winter Wheat in the Context of Climate Change: An Overview". Research Journal of Agricultural Science. 50: 69–76.
External links
- USDA ARS Fungal Database
- van Ginkel, M.; A. McNab; J. Krupinsky (1999). Septoria and stagonospora diseases of cereals: A compilation of global research (PDF). CIMMYT. p. 186pp. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2003-10-29.
- Orton E. S., Sian Deller S. & Brown J. K. M. (2011). "Mycosphaerella graminicola: from genomics to disease control". .