Battle of Tientsin
Battle of Tientsin | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part of the Boxer Rebellion | |||||||
Japanese soldiers capturing Tianjin | |||||||
| |||||||
Belligerents | |||||||
Japan Russia British Empire United States France German Empire Italy Austria-Hungary |
Boxers | ||||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||||
Anatoly Stessel (WIA) Arthur Dorward Emerson Liscum † A. R. Davis † |
Nie Shicheng † Dong Fuxiang Ronglu Cao Futian Lin Hei'er (POW)[1] | ||||||
Strength | |||||||
6,900 Allied soldiers 20 field guns 4,933 cavalry |
| ||||||
Casualties and losses | |||||||
250 killed, 500 wounded | Unknown |
Battle of Tientsin | |
---|---|
Hanyu Pinyin | Tiānjīn zhī zhàn |
Wade–Giles | T'ien'chin chih chan |
The Battle of Tientsin, or the Relief of Tientsin, occurred on 13–14 July 1900, during the
Background
Tianjin, in 1900, consisted of two adjacent, but very different sub-divisions. To the northwest was the ancient high-walled Chinese city, one mile (1.6 km) on each side. To the southeast, one to two miles away (1.6 to 3.2 km), along the
In early June 1900, in response to the growing threat of the Boxers (Militia United in Righteousness, Yihetuan), which was a
Siege
Thousands of Boxers from the countryside converged upon Tianjin, and on 15 June 1900, they rampaged through the walled city destroying Christian churches and killing Chinese Christians. On 16 June, a mob of partially armed Boxers advanced on the foreign settlement. They were driven off by volleys of fire from the defenders.
The Chinese army numbered an estimated 15,000 in Tianjin plus Boxers armed with swords, spears, and antique guns, although the number of Boxer combatants was diminishing rapidly as the movement was fading back into the countryside from where it came. The army was led by general Nie Shicheng, who was considered one of the ablest Chinese officers. Most of the Chinese army action against the foreign settlements consisted of a daily artillery barrage. The army fired an estimated 60,000 artillery shells at the foreign settlements. However, most of the shells failed to explode on impact due to inefficiency and corruption in the Chinese ammunition factories and did less damage than might otherwise have been expected.[7]
On 21 June 1900, some 131 US Marines and 400 Russians made a desperate attempt to reinforce Tianjin by following the railway from the coast to the city. Only two miles from the city they were ambushed by the Chinese and forced to retire, the Americans losing 3 killed and 13 wounded.[8][9] Additional Western soldiers were unloaded from ships offshore and rushed up the railroad to Tianjin. Five thousand reinforcements reached Tianjin on 23 June to augment the hard-pressed soldiers and civilians defending the foreign settlements. Their arrival caused the Chinese to withdraw from their position on the east which enabled the besieged to establish a tenuous line of communication and supply along the railroad to the coast, 30 miles (48 km) away. The Chinese army continued to besiege three sides of the Tianjin foreign settlements.[10] On 26 June, a force of 2,000 sallied from the settlements and rescued Admiral Seymour and his 2,000 men who were surrounded six miles (10 km) out of the city. With Seymour's men they returned to the settlements without opposition. Most of Seymour's force of sailors returned to their ships. Reinforced, and with their supply line to the coast secured, the coalition of allied soldiers in the foreign settlement began planning an assault on the walled city of Tianjin to defeat the Chinese army and open the road to Beijing and the relief of the Siege of the International Legations.[11]
Nie Shicheng and Ma Yukun commanded the forces against the Alliance, raining precise and intense ordnance against the Tianjin concessions.[12] The losses suffered by the Alliance in battle was mainly due to artillery bombardment since the Chinese army carried it out with extreme precision and in a superb manner. They hid well, employed good bulwarks of defense by using the landscape and went on the offensive in a dauntless manner and would continue battling until the end.[13] The Chinese artillery fire was so accurate that the besieged westerners falsely believed rumours that it was Russian artillery instructors who were being forced to fire the artillery after being kidnapped at bayonet point.[14]
Battle
The allies had underestimated the capability of the Chinese forces at the beginning of the siege, thinking that foreign troops could easily brush aside Chinese forces. They turned out to be wrong, in the face of fierce Chinese resistance.[2] On 13 July 1900, the allied force to assault the walled city of Tianjin consisted of about 6,900 soldiers: 2,500 Russians, 2,000 Japanese, 900 Americans, 800 British, 600 French, and 100 Germans and Austrians.[15] The challenge was substantial. The walls of Tianjin were 20 ft (6.1 m) high and 16 ft (4.9 m) thick. The Chinese had about 12,000 soldiers within the city or in nearby forts. They were well-armed with artillery, machine guns, and modern rifles. To reach the city wall, the allied troops would have to cross more than a mile (2 km) of flat, unwooded terrain, dotted with farmhouses and swamps and crossed by canals and causeways.[16] An American soldier surveying the scene said that "had a formidable enemy defended the Chinese position the attacking column would have been annihilated."[17]
The plan of the allies was to storm the city on two sides: British, American, Japanese and French troops would attack the South Gate; Russian and German troops would attack the East Gate. Herbert Hoover, who was based in the city as a mining engineer, agreed to guide the Allied forces through the local terrain. Early in the morning of 13 July 1900, Hoover with the US Marines guided the three columns of British, American, Japanese and French troops to the approaches to the South Gate. When the lead troops came under fire, Hoover was permitted to withdraw from the action and return to Tianjin where the civilian population was waiting to be evacuated to the Taku (Dagu) Forts. However, Hoover and his wife, Lou Henry Hoover, remained in Tianjin to care for the wounded.[18]
The attack went poorly for the Allies in large part due to the lack of overall command. Miscommunication and uncoordinated movements plagued the attackers. The main effort against the South Gate became pinned down in an exposed position under Chinese fire from within the city. The Chinese again unleashed a torrent of fire upon the Allies. The allied troops were forced to lie face down in mud. The uniform of the American troops, dark blue, provided a virtual bull's eye to the Chinese troops, equipped with western firearms, such as
The Japanese General Fukushima Yasumasa, who had fought against the Chinese previously, warned Allied commander Dorwood that Chinese forces would fight to the death if trapped, but if they left an escape route of two gates open, the Chinese would retreat.[22]
Eventually the attacks were called off. The Japanese soldiers attempted to blast away the South Gate but the defenders continued to simply cut or extinguish the fuses. At 3:00 am the following morning the Japanese finally succeeded. A soldier volunteered to brave the enemy fire and light a short fuse. The soldier was killed in the explosion but succeeded in breaching the gate. Japanese soldiers charged through the open gate and entered the city, followed by the British and American soldiers. The Russians renewed their attack on the East Gate and broke through, causing the remaining Imperial Chinese soldiers to withdraw from the city. Once inside the city the Allied soldiers became disorganized and some engaged in looting.
After General Nie was killed and Generals Ma and Song retreated, only Dong Fuxiang remained with his Muslim troops to combat the advancing forces of the Eight-Nation Alliance from Tianjin to Beijing.[23]
Casualties
For the Eight-Nation Alliance, Tientsin was the bloodiest battle of the Boxer Rebellion. Two hundred and fifty soldiers of the allied armies were killed and about 500 wounded. The Japanese lost 320 killed and wounded; the Russians and Germans 140 killed and wounded; the Americans 25 killed, and 98 wounded; the British, 17 killed and 87 wounded; and the French 13 killed and 50 wounded. Casualties for the Chinese Army and the Boxers are unknown.[24]
Aftermath
After the victory at Tientsin, the foreign soldiers decided that the advance on Beijing should be delayed until sufficient forces were collected. This was largely on account of the changed opinions regarding Chinese valor and the effectiveness of their resistance to the Seymour expedition. As it was, the Allies would have tarried at Tianjin for additional reinforcements some weeks longer had not the British and American commanders threatened to proceed alone with their contingents and risk the consequences. Although it was felt, so had the estimation of Chinese prowess been increased, that at least 50,000 troops were necessary, some thought 70,000, successfully to invade the interior, the second relief expedition to Beijing finally got under way, 4 August, with 18,800 men. This number included 8,000 Japanese, 3,000 British, 4,500 Russians, 2,500 Americans, and 800 French. The Germans were unrepresented, as it was judged best to reserve some strength for Kiaochau and the coast, in case of trouble there.[citation needed]
Monument
In the Nankai District of Tianjin in present-day China, a "Nie Shicheng Martyrs Monument" is in the area, to General Nie Shicheng who died in battle at the Battle of Tientsin.[25]
See also
- Military history of the Qing dynasty
- Military history of China
Sources
- ^ "Lin Hei'er – head of the Red Lantern Unit – ColorQ Articles Etc". www.colorq.org. Retrieved 13 January 2019.
- ^ ISBN 978-1-295-55629-8. Retrieved 28 June 2010.
- ^ Thompson, Larry Clinton. William Scott Ament and the Boxer Rebellion: Heroism, Hubris, and the Ideal Missionary. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 1909, p. 98 books.google.com
- ISBN 9788871985480.
- ^ Preston, Diana. The Boxer Rebellion: The Dramatic Story of China's War on Foreigners that Shook the World in the Summer of 1900. New York: Berkley Books, January 2001, p. 107.
- ^ Thompson, pp. 98–100
- ISBN 0-393-04085-2. Retrieved 28 November 2010.
chinese artillery battered settlements.
- ^ Paul Henry Clements (1915). The Boxer rebellion: a political and diplomatic review. Vol. 66, Issues 1–3. Columbia University, New York. p. 135. Retrieved 9 January 2011.
- ^ Xiang, Lanxin (2014). The Origins of the Boxer War: A Multinational Study. Routledge. p. 302. Retrieved 11 November 2014.
- ^ See the report by U. S. Consul Ragsdale on the "Siege of Tientsin" in U. S. For. Rel, 1900, pp. 268–273.
- ^ Bodin, Lynn The Boxer Rebellion. London: Osprey Publishing, 1979, p. 15
- ISBN 978-1-4008-7884-0.
- ISBN 978-1-4008-7884-0.
- ISBN 978-1429942577.
- ^ Landor, A. Henry Savage. China and the Allies. New York: Scribner’s Sons, 1901, pp. 181–182.
- ^ Thompson, pp. 130–131; Fleming p. 163.
- ^ Daggett, A. S. America in the China Relief Expedition. Kansas City, MO: Hudson-Kimberly, 1903, p. 28
- )
- ISBN 0-465-00721-X. Retrieved 28 November 2010.
- ISBN 0-393-04085-2. Retrieved 28 November 2010.
allies devastating fire americans 150 men.
- ISBN 0-465-00721-X. Retrieved 28 November 2010.
- ISBN 0-393-04085-2. Retrieved 28 November 2010.
chinese trapped fight to the end.
- ISBN 962-996-066-4. Retrieved 28 June 2010.
- ^ Thompson, pp 130, 138
- ^ "Nie Shicheng Martyrs Monument (Tianjin) – 2019 All You Need to Know BEFORE You Go (with Photos)". TripAdvisor.
Further reading
- Harrington, Peter (2001). Peking 1900: The Boxer Rebellion. Osprey Publishing
- Preston, Diana (2000). The Boxer Rebellion: the dramatic story of China's war on foreigners that shook the world in the Summer of 1900. New York: Walker
- Hoover, Herbert (1952). The memoirs of Herbert Hoover: years of adventure, 1874–1920.
- Thompson, Larry Clinton (2009). William Scott Ament and the Boxer Rebellion: Heroism, Hubris, and the Ideal Missionary, Jefferson, NC: McFarland Publishing Company. ISBN 978-0-7864-4008-5.
- Angelo Paratico The Dew of Heaven ISBN 0997536330, Cactus Moon Publishing, Tempe, Arizona, 2015