Chinese cruiser Chaoyong

This is a good article. Click here for more information.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Chaoyong docked on the River Tyne
History
Imperial China
NameChaoyong
Ordered1879
Builder
Newcastle Upon Tyne
Laid down15 January 1880
Launched11 November 1880
Completed14 July 1881
Commissioned22 November 1881
FateSank, 17 September 1894
General characteristics
Class and typeTsukushi-class cruiser
Displacement1,350 long tons (1,370 t)
Length220 ft (67 m)
Beam32 ft (9.8 m)
Draught15.5 ft (4.7 m)
Installed power2,580 ihp (1,920 kW)
Propulsion
Speed16 kn (30 km/h; 18 mph)
Boats & landing
craft carried
2 x Pinnaces
Complement140
Armament
  • 2 ×
    254 mm (10.0 in)
    cannons
  • 4 × Armstrong Whitworth 120 mm (4.7 in) cannons
  • 2 × twin Armstrong Whitworth 9-pounders
  • 4 × 11 mm Gatling guns
  • 4 × 37 mm Hotchkiss guns
  • 2 × 4-barreled Nordenfelt guns

Chaoyong (

Newcastle Upon Tyne, England, from a design by Sir George Wightwick Rendel which had already been used on the Chilean Navy vessel Arturo Prat (later the Imperial Japanese Navy's Tsukushi). Two ships were ordered by the Chinese, Chaoyong and Yangwei. Both would serve together throughout their careers, assigned to the Beiyang Fleet and based in Taku during the summer, and Chemulpo
, Korea, in the winter.

Chaoyong did not see any action during the

Battle of Yalu River on 17 September 1894. She was one of the early casualties of the battle, being set alight, and sinking after a collision with the Chinese cruiser Jiyuan
.

Design

The design for Chaoyong was advertised by its designer, British naval architect Sir George Wightwick Rendel, as an example of a low-cost cruiser able to withstand larger ironclad warships. The design was later seen as an intermediate concept between his flat-iron gunboats and the protected cruiser.[1] In theory, the ship would rely on its small size and higher speed, along with a higher muzzle velocity main battery to attack larger,[2][3] less maneuverable ships.[4]

Chaoyong's basic design was initially used on the

Newcastle Upon Tyne. Mitchell had worked alongside Rendel, and was building Arturo Prat. Chaoyang measured 220 feet (67 m) long overall, with a beam of 32 ft (9.8 m) and an average draft of 15.5 ft (4.7 m). The ships were manned by 140 crew.[5] The most significant difference between the two ships was the power output of their reciprocating engines; while Yangwei had an output of 2,580 indicated horsepower (1,920 kilowatts), Chaoyong's engine supplied 2,677 ihp (1,996 kW). This meant that while Yangwei could achieve a speed of 16 knots (30 km/h; 18 mph), Chaoyong could go faster at 16.8 kn (31.1 km/h; 19.3 mph).[6]

They both were constructed out of 0.75 inches (1.9 cm) steel with waterproof bulkhead 3.5 ft (1.1 m) below the

Nordenfeldt guns, as well as two torpedo tubes.[7] Both ships were equipped with two pinnaces, which were each armed with spar torpedoes.[8]

Career

Chinese diplomat Li Hongzhang was made aware of Rendel's designs, and following the start of the construction on Arturo Prat, an order was placed on behalf of the Imperial Chinese Navy for two ships of the same type. Chaoyong was laid down on 15 January 1880, and launched on 4 November. She was subsequently worked up, and was announced as completed on 15 July, a day after her sister ship, Yangwei. They were both completed ahead of Arturo Prat,[5] who instead would enter service as the Imperial Japanese Navy's Tsukushi after Chile cancelled the order following the end of the War of the Pacific.[1]

Each of the Chinese vessels were equipped with Chinese crews, with Western captains and instructors in place. They sailed out of the

Tyne River on 9 August, and stopped in Plymouth Sound two days later where Admiral Ding Ruchang joined them to take command of the ships for the journey to China.[5] Following their arrival on 20 October in Hong Kong,[9] they toured Canton (now Guangzhou) and Shanghai, before travelling to the Taku Forts. Chaoyong was boarded by Hongzhang, and the two cruisers took the diplomat to inspect the dredging of the port at Taku (now the Port of Tianjin). Both ships were assigned to the Beiyang Fleet in the north, and Ruchang was placed in command.[6]

On 23 June 1884, Chaoyong was present alongside Yangwei, as well as the

Formosa.[12] She and Yangwei were sent south to Shanghai in November, but were then brought back north after concerns were raised about growing Japanese influences in Korea.[13]

Battle of Yalu River

Following the war, Chaoyong and Yangwei continued to operate together. They operated out of Taku, but since the water froze over during winter, they would spend that part of the year in the Korean port of Chemulpo (now Incheon).[14] During the First Sino-Japanese War in 1894, Chaoyong remained with the fleet and was supporting troop transports when they made contact with a Japanese fleet on the morning of 17 September.[15]

As the Japanese fleet moved in, the Chinese fleet moved away from anchor and attempted for form up in a line. However, the manoeuvre was botched and Chaoyong was one of four ships which ended up behind the others.[15] This was due to a lack of maintenance over the years; with their equipment out of date, they could barely make 10 kn (19 km/h; 12 mph). Orders had been given for the ships to operate in pairs, with Chaoyong and Yangwei teamed together. This battle plan was alien to the premise of their design, inherent in the lack of armour for ships about to fight in the line of battle.[16]

At a distance of 3,000 yd (2,700 m), the Japanese fleet began to fire on the Chaoyong. Within a few minutes, fires broke out, which quickly engulfed the central superstructure with its numerous wooden partitions covered with thick layers of flammable varnish applied over the years. Yangwei quickly suffered the same fate. As the Chaoyong attempted to make way to a nearby island to beach itself,[17] it collided with the Chinese cruiser Jiyuan, before listing to starboard and sinking in shallow water nearby.[16][18] Some of the crew were rescued by a Chinese torpedo boat engaged in the battle.[19]

Notes

  1. ^ a b Chesneau & Kolesnik 1979, p. 233.
  2. ^ Friedman 2012, p. 150.
  3. Newspapers.com.Open access icon
  4. ^ van de Ven 2014, p. 110.
  5. ^ a b c Wright 2000, p. 47.
  6. ^ a b Wright 2000, p. 48.
  7. ^ Wright 2000, p. 49.
  8. ^ Wright 2000, p. 181.
  9. ^ The Desk Hong List 1884, p. 173.
  10. ^ a b Wright 2000, pp. 60–61.
  11. ^ Wright 2000, pp. 62–63.
  12. ^ "The Chinese Navy". The Examiner. 31 January 1885. p. 1. Retrieved 11 December 2016 – via Trove.
  13. ^ Wright 2000, p. 64.
  14. ^ Wright 2000, p. 81.
  15. ^ a b Wright 2000, p. 90.
  16. ^ a b Wright 2000, p. 91.
  17. ^ Brassey 1895, p. 111.
  18. ^ Inouye 1895, p. 3.
  19. ^ Wright 2000, p. 92.

References

External links