Criticism of the response to the Grenfell Tower fire

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

The fire during the early morning of 14 June 2017.

Criticism of the response to the Grenfell Tower fire primarily consisted of condemnation of issues with the emergency response and fire safety regulation practices in the UK at the time. Broader political criticism was also directed at British society, including condemnation of the response by governmental bodies and UK politicians, social divisions, deregulation issues, and poor transparency overall.

Grenfell Tower, the fire, and its aftermath
The Fire
Inquiry
Involved parties
Wider legacy
Category

Emergency response issues

Media reporting included criticism of the response of London Fire Brigade and other agencies. The Grenfell Tower Inquiry concluded in October 2019 that mistakes in the response cost lives. Despite this, it also praised the "courage and devotion to duty" of ordinary firefighters.[1]

Stay-put policy

External image
image icon Public Fire Notice from nearby KCTMO tower indicating "Stay Put" policy[2]

The fire safety policy for Grenfell Tower was that residents were advised to stay in their flats ("stay put") if a fire broke out in the building,[3] unless it was affecting their flat.[4] This is the standard policy for high rise buildings in the United Kingdom but not accepted practice in many other countries. It relies on the assumption that construction standards such as concrete and fire-resistant doors will allow firefighters to contain a fire within one flat. This was not possible at Grenfell Tower, as the fire spread rapidly via the exterior.[5] Due to this policy, the building was not designed to be fully evacuated. There was only a single narrow staircase, and no centrally activated system of fire alarms that could alert residents.[6]

In a July 2014 Grenfell Tower regeneration newsletter, the KCTMO instructed residents to stay in their flat in case of a fire ("Our longstanding 'stay put' policy stays in force until you are told otherwise") and stated that the front doors for each unit could survive a fire for up to 30 minutes.[7] The May 2016 newsletter had a similar message, adding that it was on the advice of the Fire Brigade:

The smoke detection systems have been upgraded and extended. The Fire Brigade has asked us to reinforce the message that, if there is a fire which is not inside your own home, you are generally safest to stay put in your home to begin with; the Fire Brigade will arrive very quickly if a fire is reported.[8]

The advice was repeated to residents who called the fire service.[3] The policy was withdrawn at 02:47, when control room staff were instead told to advise residents to evacuate if possible.[9][10] At 04:14, the police told onlookers to contact anyone still trapped in the building and tell them to attempt to evacuate immediately.[11]

Many survivors argued that they would have died had they followed the "stay put" advice.[5][3] Sadiq Khan, the Mayor of London, also criticised the policy: "Thankfully residents didn't take that advice but fled". He added, "These are some of the questions that have to be answered. We have lots of people in London living in tower blocks ... We can't have people's lives being put at risk because of bad advice or lack of maintenance."[12][13] In her report, Barbara Lane concluded that the principles required for the "stay put" policy to work failed once the fire started spreading across the exterior.[14]

Dany Cotton said Grenfell was unique in terms of volume and behaviour of fire. She said it was a matter for the inquiry, but defended the general "stay put" policy for most high-rise buildings by reasoning that if residents all evacuate at once, they could block firefighters from entering. Furthermore, smoke and fire could be spread within a building by residents opening doors.[15] In her later witness statement to the Inquiry, she said that as the building did not have a central fire alarm system, evacuating the building "would physically require someone to go and knock on every single door and tell people to come out."[16] Since the Grenfell Tower fire, LFB's policy of high-rise buildings with flammable cladding has been changed so that until the cladding is removed, landlords should install alarm systems or have patrols in place so that the building can be evacuated.[16][17]

The initial incident commander Watch Manager Michael Dowden told the Inquiry that he was preoccupied and uncomfortable dealing with "a very, very dynamic situation" that he was not prepared to deal with, and that he did not consider evacuating the building. He added that in hindsight, he did not believe it would have been possible, as there were not enough firefighters present to evacuate 20 floors. Station Manager Andrew Walton, who was incident commander for a short period after, said that as smoke was spreading to the stairwell and many lobbies, residents could not have escaped and he believed they were safer staying in unaffected flats.[18] Watch Manager Brien O'Keeffe suggested it could have been a "catastrophe" to tell residents to evacuate unaided once the stairwell was filled with smoke.[19] On the other hand, Assistant Commissioner Andrew Roe said that due to the complete failure of the building, he made a decision to change the policy soon after taking over as incident commander.[20]

The Inquiry later concluded that lives had been lost because the policy had not been lifted while the stairs were still passable. It found that the fire officers had not been trained to deal with a situation where they might have to evacuate a tower block.[1]

Fire brigade resources

Research by John Sweeney for BBC Newsnight described several issues that hampered the response of the London Fire Brigade (LFB). There was insufficient mains water pressure for the hoses the fire service used and Thames Water had to be called to increase it.[21][22] Also, a high ladder did not arrive for 32 minutes, by which time the fire was out of control. Matt Wrack of the Fire Brigades Union said, "... having that on the first attendance might have made a difference because it allows you to operate a very powerful water tower from outside the building onto the building." Before the Grenfell fire, 70% of fire brigades would have automatically sent a high ladder to tower fires.[23]

An independent fire expert told the BBC having the ladder earlier could have stopped the fire getting out of control.[24] The LFB told Newsnight the first attendance procedure for tower fires has now been changed from four engines to five engines plus a high ladder unit. Firefighters said inside the building they lacked sufficient 'extended duration' breathing apparatus. They had difficulty getting vital radio messages through due to 'overuse of the system' and from the need to get the signal through layers of concrete. At the inquiry one firefighter described the radios as "useless."[25]

Another issue raised was the height of the aerial appliances. LFB's aerial appliances could reach 32 m (105 ft) high, whereas the tower was 67 m (220 ft) high. A 42 m (138 ft) firefighting platform was borrowed from Surrey, arriving only after the fire had been burning for several hours. Commissioner Dany Cotton said that the LFB had already been planning to buy higher ladders, and that the size of LFB's appliances has been limited by their need to fit on narrow London streets.[26] London mayor Sadiq Khan promised to supply new equipment that the London Fire Brigade needed promptly and stated he would not wait for the public inquiry.[27]

Dany Cotton later said having more firefighters may not have helped as there would not have physically been enough room for them in the building. The single stairwell also restricted access.[15]

Smoke

One of the major obstacles to the firefighters was that the tower's only stairwell filled with smoke within an hour of the fire breaking out. This made it very difficult for residents to escape unaided; Barbara Lane's report noted that the rate of evacuations slowed after 01:38, and again after 01:58.[28] Furthermore, firefighters were hindered by the near-zero visibility on the stairwell.[3] Crew Manager Aldo Diana said he was "surprised" by the amount of smoke in the stairwell, describing conditions as:

Basically you couldn't see your hand in front of your face. It was just thick black smoke. You didn't see anybody else. You literally had to bump into them.[29]

In section 19 of her report, Barbara Lane notes that smoke was reported in the lobbies of four floors as early as 01:18. By 01:58, the stairwell and seven lobbies were filled with smoke. She suggested that possible causes for this included inadequate fire doors, fire doors being propped open by hoses and problems with the ventilation system.[30]

In October 2018 the London Fire Brigade announced that it is to use specialist hoods to protect people from smoke and toxic fumes for up to fifteen minutes. They were purchased from German company Drager at a cost of £90,000 for 650 hoods.[31]

Road access

Kensington and Chelsea Council was warned in 2010 that building a new secondary school very near Grenfell Tower could block access by emergency vehicles. A 2013 blog post by Grenfell Action Group stated, "There is barely adequate room to manoeuvre for fire engines responding to emergency calls, and any obstruction of this emergency access zone could have lethal consequences in the event of a serious fire or similar emergency in Grenfell Tower or the adjacent blocks." The council demolished a multi-storey car park to build the school. This added to congestion and parked cars in streets around Grenfell Tower that were already narrow and made it hard for fire engines to get to the fire.[32]

Lack of sprinklers

Like the vast majority of high-rise buildings in the UK, Grenfell Tower did not have sprinklers.[33] A BBC Breakfast investigation focusing on half of the UK's council- and housing association-owned tower blocks found that 2% of them had full sprinkler systems. Deaths were 87% lower when buildings with sprinklers caught fire. England, Wales and Scotland now require sprinklers to be installed in newly built tall buildings, since 2007, but there is no requirement to fit them in existing buildings.[34] Dany Cotton has called for sprinklers to be retrofitted in all social housing blocks.[35] David Siber, an advisor to the Fire Brigades Union, said that sprinklers could have prevented the fire from ever spreading beyond the kitchen where it started.[36] Geoff Wilkinson, the building regulations columnist for the Architects' Journal, said that once the fire starting spreading through cladding, sprinklers would have had little effect.[37]

A few days after the fire, the

ITV business editor Joel Hills stated that he had been told that the installation of sprinklers had not even been discussed.[39]

Criticism of fire safety regulation

Reinhard Ries, the fire chief in Frankfurt, Germany, was critical of lax fire regulations in the United Kingdom, contrasting the laws in Germany that ban flammable cladding on buildings higher than 22 m and require segregated fire-stairs and firefighting lifts which can be used by the fire brigade and injured or disabled people.[40]

Russ Timpson of the Tall Buildings Fire Safety Network told The Telegraph that "foreign colleagues are staggered" when they learn that UK regulations permit high-rise buildings to have only a single staircase, and called on the government to review the relevant regulations.[41] New high-rise buildings in England, since 2007, are required to have sprinklers with no requirement to install them in older buildings, and as a result few have sprinklers.[35] Other notable criticisms of UK fire regulations included a change in the law in 1986 under a Conservative government that abolished a requirement that external walls should have at least one hour's fire resistance to prevent fires from re-entering a building and spreading to other apartments.[41]

The New York Times reported that because of the Great Fire of London, UK building codes have historically been overly focused on containing horizontal fire spread between buildings or between units in larger buildings, as opposed to vertical fire spread in high-rise buildings.[42]

The Royal Institute of British Architects fears that flammable cladding will not be totally banned, and they further fear that sprinkler systems and extra escape staircases will not be required. These three measures could have saved lives in Grenfell, according to widespread beliefs.[43]

Reviews into fire safety in tower blocks

After the fatal Lakanal House fire in 2009, the coroner made a series of safety recommendations for the government to consider in order to improve safety in tower blocks. The report highlighted the flammable panels that covered part of the exterior, the lack of sprinklers, a lack of safety inspections, and that the stay put policy did not suit a building where compartmentalisation had failed.[44]

The

James Wharton] and there were a number of matters that we are looking at and we are still looking at it."[46] In March 2014, the All-Party Parliamentary Fire Safety and Rescue Group sent a letter to then Minister for Communities Stephen Williams, warning that similar fires to the one at Lakanal House were possible, especially due to the lack of sprinklers in tower blocks.[47] After further correspondence, Williams replied: "I have neither seen nor heard anything that would suggest that consideration of these specific potential changes is urgent and I am not willing to disrupt the work of this department by asking that these matters are brought forward."[45] In March 2015, at the request of the Department for Communities and Local Government, fire experts at the Building Research Establishment (BRE) studies produced reports assessing the level of fire risk at tower blocks. The experts warned of fatalities unless the danger of flames passing through concealed cavities was addressed.[48]

Other political criticism and debate

See also: Kensington and Chelsea London Borough Council § Grenfell Tower fire

There is a political tension between those who focus the blame on technical failures, such as the refrigerator fire and the installation of flammable cladding, and those who focus the blame on politically charged explanation, such as deregulation, spending cuts and neglect.

Bagehot in

Owen Jones argued that trying to stop the fire from being politicized meant ignoring its causes.[51][52][53]

Government response

The government response was to eventually set up a dedicated benefits line and a fund to support the survivors.[54]

Theresa May's personal response

On the day after the fire, May made a private visit to Grenfell Tower to speak with members of the emergency services, but did not meet with any of the survivors.[55] Conservative MP Tobias Ellwood stated this was due to security concerns. BBC political editor Laura Kuenssberg commented that May's decision not to meet those who lived in the tower might be interpreted as "indicative of a lack of empathy".[56] An editorial in The Guardian called it May's "Hurricane Katrina moment".[57] Former Conservative cabinet minister Michael Portillo described her meeting with members of the emergency services as "a good thing" but felt she "should have been there with the residents. She wanted an entirely controlled situation in which she didn't use her humanity".[58]

The following day, she visited survivors in hospital and a church that was serving as a relief centre; during the latter visit she was heckled by some of those present.[59][60] An article written by former Conservative MP Matthew Parris in The Times described her as "a good and moral person, who wants the best for her country, and is not privately unfeeling, ... in public is crippled by personal reserve".[61] Andrea Leadsom, the Leader of the House of Commons, subsequently visited a relief centre at the Rugby Portobello Trust, where she was confronted by residents angered by May's response, and described the prime minister as being "absolutely heartbroken" over events at Grenfell Tower.[62]

In an article for the

London Evening Standard on 11 June 2018, May wrote of her regret for the handling of the fire and its public perception.[63]

Council response

The local council's response to the Grenfell Tower fire has been subject to widespread criticism. Council member Emma Dent Coad, also the newly elected Labour MP for the area (Kensington constituency) and a former board member of KCTMO,[64] accused the council of having failed and betrayed its residents; characterising the fire as "entirely preventable", she added that "I can't help thinking that poor quality materials and construction standards may have played a part in this hideous and unforgivable event".[64][65] Sadiq Khan called on the government to appoint commissioners to run Kensington and Chelsea council until the May 2018 council elections.[66]

Edward Daffam of the Grenfell Action Group said, "They didn't give a stuff about us. We were the carcass and they were the vultures. North Kensington was like a goldmine, only they didn't have to dig for the gold. All they had to do was to marginalise the people who were living here, and that's what they were doing."[67]

In December 2020, it emerged that the building in which the council had re-housed Grenfell survivors was itself a severe fire hazard, requiring round-the-clock fire safety patrols.[68]

In February 2021, Elizabeth Campbell, the leader of the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea council, apologised for a series of property deals made before 2017 fire.[69]

Social division

Grenfell Tower is in the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, one of the wealthiest local authorities in the country, containing some of the most expensive houses in the world, and with the highest gap between rich and poor anywhere in the country.[70] Grenfell Tower was populated by poorer, mainly ethnic-minority residents. The Conservative-run council[71] was criticised for neglecting the borough's poorer residents, and some have blamed their neglect as a cause of the fire.[72]

In 2016, the council took £55 million in rent but only invested less than £40 million in council housing.[73] One journalist described the incident as an example of Britain's inequality.[74] Data released in June 2017 by Trust for London and New Policy Institute shows large divides between rich and poor in the borough of Kensington and Chelsea. The analysis found that it is a borough with some very high incomes, as well as the highest average incomes in London, but there are pockets of deprivation, particularly in the north end of the borough, including the ward in which Grenfell Tower is located.[75]

The philosophical difference of providing a high standard of public housing and providing the bare minimum to house only those most in need first occurred as the Lancaster West Estate was being built.[76] Grenfell and the finger blocks were built to Parker Morris standards;[76] the tower provided one- and two-bedroom flats for single occupiers or families without children. The incoming Conservative government revised the standards down, using the Local Government, Planning and Land Act 1980 to replace the mandatory Space in the Home document.[77]

Underinvestment

After the fire, volunteer people and groups worked to help those made homeless and without possessions.[78] The volunteers criticised council officials for doing little to coordinate these efforts.[78] There were calls to jail those responsible for the fire.[79] Deborah Orr wrote, "We know that fire-safe cladding was available. The idea of being energy efficient and safe was not impossible, or even undesirable in theory. But fire-resistant cladding would have raised the cost for the whole building by an estimated £5,000. That sum may be what people died for."[80]

On 17 June 2017, MPs asked the council to describe why it had amassed £274 million of reserves, after years of underspending, and had not used any of its budget surplus to increase fire safety, given that residents had issued repeated warnings about the Grenfell Tower fire risk. The council actually used the surplus to pay top-rate council taxpayers a £100 rebate shortly before local elections, which returned a Conservative council.[81][73] After the fire, some former residents of Grenfell Tower still had rent payment taken out of their bank account for the burnt out property by the council.[82]

Residents approved initial plans for fire resistant zinc cladding, but this was later changed to cheaper aluminium cladding with combustible polyethylene core, which residents did not approve, saving nearly £300,000.[83]

Neglect

The council received further criticism for their lack of support on 18 June 2017.[84] Some families were reported to be sleeping on the floor in local centres four days after the event.[85] A leading volunteer in the relief effort said: "Kensington and Chelsea are giving £10 to the survivors when they go to the hotels – a tenner – there is money pouring in from all these amazing volunteers. We can't get access to this money."[85]

London mayor Sadiq Khan said "years of neglect" by the council and successive governments were responsible for what had been a "preventable accident".[86] There are calls for the council leader and some others to resign.[87]

Dawn Foster, contributing editor on housing for The Guardian, said that this was an "atrocity" that "was explicitly political" and "a symbol of the United Kingdom's deep inequality".[88]

Deregulation

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn brought this to the attention of the House; he said these "terrible consequences of deregulation and cutting corners" stemmed from a "disregard for working-class communities".[89]

London Mayor Sadiq Khan said:[46] "Those who mock health and safety, regulations and red tape need to take a hard look at the consequences of cutting these and ask themselves whether Grenfell Tower is a price worth paying." Patrick Cockburn of The Independent criticised deregulation of the building industry by the government, which he described as "cutting red tape". This was contrasted with the increasing complexity of processes faced by prospective benefits claimants including those with mental health issues. Cockburn said long inquiries were not necessary to establish what went wrong. Cockburn said that "The Government is clearly frightened that the burned bodies in Grenfell Towers will be seen as martyrs who died because of austerity, deregulation and outsourcing."[90] Writing in The Guardian, Alan Travis argued that fire safety had been compromised since the early 2000s by moving the responsibility for fire safety checks from the fire brigade to building owners and creating mandatory competition between Local Authority Building Control and private approved inspectors.[89]

Social murder

In his column on the disaster, Aditya Chakrabortty of The Guardian drew comparisons to the often lethal living and working conditions faced by the working classes and poor in Victorian Manchester, which Friedrich Engels characterised as social murder in his 1845 study The Condition of the Working Class in England. Chakrabortty stated that "those dozens of Grenfell residents didn't die: they were killed. What happened last week wasn't a 'terrible tragedy' or some other studio-sofa platitude: it was social murder . . . Over 170 years later, Britain remains a country that murders its poor."[91] The Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer, John McDonnell, also said that the fire amounted to "social murder" and that "political decisions in recent decades" led to it, and that "those responsible should be held to account".[92]

Poor transparency

On 29 June 2017, Kensington and Chelsea London Borough Council held its first full meeting since the fire. The council had tried to exclude the press and public from the meeting, citing safety concerns. Journalists sought an injunction to force the council to let them attend, which was granted. The meeting was adjourned shortly after it began, with members of the council's cabinet saying that to proceed would be prejudicial to the forthcoming public inquiry. Sadiq Khan and Robert Atkinson, Labour group leader on the council, both called for the council's entire cabinet to resign. Atkinson described the situation as "an absolute fiasco". Khan said that it "beggared belief" that the council was trying to hold meetings in secret when the meeting was the first chance the council had to provide some answers and show transparency. He said that some people were asking "whether or not the council was involved in a cover up".[93][94] Conservative council leader Nicholas Paget-Brown resigned on 30 June 2017.[95]

Criticism of the media

MacTaggart Lecture at the Edinburgh International Television Festival to complain that the media was "comfortably with the elite, with little awareness, contact or connection with those not of the elite" and this lack of connection was "dangerous". He demanded "Why didn't any of us see the Grenfell action blog?"[96]

Conservative Party survey

In November 2017, a branch of the Kensington Conservative Party caused anger by sending out a survey to local residents asking them to rate how important the Grenfell Tower fire was, alongside issues such as parking and recycling.[97][98][99]

References

  1. ^ a b Booth, Robert (30 October 2019). "Grenfell Tower fire survivors welcome damning inquiry report". The Guardian. Retrieved 30 October 2019.
  2. ^ Schraer, Rachel; Goodman, Jack (14 June 2017). "London fire: Why are people told to 'stay put'?". BBC News. Retrieved 11 June 2018.
  3. ^ a b c d "London fire: Six killed as Grenfell Tower engulfed". BBC News. 14 June 2017. Archived from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2017.
  4. ^ "Grenfell inquiry: Stay-put advice 'good' says firefighter". BBC. 4 September 2018. Retrieved 28 November 2018.
  5. ^ a b Dixon, Hayley; Swinford, Steven; Knapton, Sarah; Mendick, Robert (14 June 2017). "Grenfell Tower inferno a 'disaster waiting to happen' as concerns are raised for safety of other buildings". The Telegraph. Telegraph Media Group. Archived from the original on 15 June 2017. Retrieved 15 June 2017. Many of those that survived only did so by ignoring official advice to stay in their rooms and close their front doors until the fire was over. ... All fire safety regulations are focused on containing a fire within a building, but this cannot happen if it is spreading along the outside.
  6. ^ "Fire alarm at Grenfell Tower was never meant for residents". The Times. 7 July 2017. Retrieved 4 October 2018.
  7. ^ "Grenfell Tower regeneration newsletter July 2014" (PDF). Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2017.
  8. ^ "Grenfell Tower Regeneration Newsletter, May 2016" (PDF). Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea TMO. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 June 2017.
  9. ^ Grenfell Tower 'stay put' advice lasted nearly two hours, BBC; accessed 14 November 2017.
  10. ^ Grenfell Tower ‘stay put’ fire safety protocol ‘ditched after two hours’, Bournemouth Daily Echo; accessed 14 November 2017.
  11. ^ "Firefighters battle huge blaze in London". news.com.au. News. 14 June 2017. Archived from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 14 June 2017.
  12. ^ Pasha-Robinson, Lucy (14 June 2017). "Residents inside 24-storey London flats on fire were told to stay inside in case of blaze". The Independent. Archived from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 16 June 2017.
  13. ^ Sadiq Khan condemns "bad advice" given to Grenfell Tower residents in the event of a fire, Harper's Bazaar, accessed 14 November 2017.
  14. ^ Booth, Robert; Bowcott, Owen (4 June 2018). "What we learned from day eight of the Grenfell Tower inquiry". The Guardian. Retrieved 6 July 2018.
  15. ^ a b Long, Jackie (11 July 2017). "Dany Cotton: only a 'miracle' could have saved Grenfell". Channel 4 News. Retrieved 12 July 2017.
  16. ^ a b "Grenfell Tower Inquiry – Witness Statement of Dany Cotton". 27 September 2018. Retrieved 4 October 2018.
  17. ^ "Grenfell: 'Stay put' advice suspended on 112 London housing blocks". Construction News. 14 June 2018. Retrieved 4 October 2018.
  18. ^ "Grenfell fire commander feared residents would die if evacuated". Belfast Telegraph. 20 September 2018. Retrieved 4 October 2018.
  19. ^ "Grenfell Tower Inquiry – 6 July 2018". 6 July 2018. Retrieved 2 August 2018.
  20. ^ "Grenfell Tower Inquiry – 25 September 2018". 25 September 2018. Retrieved 4 October 2018.
  21. ^ Sweeney, John (7 July 2017). "Grenfell firefighters 'hampered by equipment'". BBC. Retrieved 8 July 2017.
  22. ^ Lack of equipment 'hampered Grenfell rescue effort' The Guardian
  23. ^ London fire: Most services would have sent high ladder to Grenfell BBC
  24. ^ Grenfell Tower fire: 'Half an hour' high ladder delay BBC
  25. ^ "Grenfell inquiry: Firefighter recalls mission to save girl". BBC News. 29 June 2018. Retrieved 29 June 2018.
  26. ^ Furby, Gareth (23 June 2017). "London tower fire: Why were taller fire platforms not used?". BBC News. Retrieved 20 April 2019.
  27. ^ Grenfell Tower fire: 'Urgent review' of firefighting resources requested BBC
  28. ^ "Twenty-seven minutes and Grenfell Tower fire had taken hold: so why weren't residents told to get out?". The Daily Telegraph. 5 June 2018. Retrieved 5 June 2018.
  29. ^ Clarke, Tom (7 August 2018). "The first documents that show there were official warnings about fire safety at Grenfell Tower months before tragedy". Independent Television News. Retrieved 7 August 2018.
  30. ^ "Dr Barbara Lane's expert report – Grenfell Tower Inquiry". Grenfelltowerinquiry.org.uk. Retrieved 4 February 2019.
  31. ^ "London fire crews will use smoke hoods to save lives from toxic fumes in rescues". Evening Standard. Retrieved 12 October 2018.
  32. ^ Grenfell Tower: Council knew of emergency access fears BBC
  33. ^ "Reality Check: Why don't all high-rises have sprinklers?". BBC News. 15 June 2017. Retrieved 8 June 2018.
  34. ^ Weaver, Matthew (13 September 2017). "Only 2% of UK's council tower blocks have full sprinkler system". The Guardian. Retrieved 13 September 2017.
  35. ^ a b Greenwood, George; Langton, Katie (13 September 2017). "Grenfell fire chief calls for sprinklers in tower blocks". BBC. Retrieved 13 September 2017.
  36. ^ Doward, Jamie (17 June 2017). "Grenfell Tower: the chronicle of a tragedy foretold". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 June 2017. Retrieved 17 June 2017. If the building had been provided with sprinklers then that fire, if it started in the kitchen, would never have got out of the kitchen and nobody except the firefighters who would have gone there to mop up would have known about it.
  37. ^ Geoff Wilkinson (14 June 2017). "Grenfell Tower: residents had predicted massive fire". Architects' Journal. Archived from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 17 June 2017.
  38. ^ "London fire: Tower victims 'may never be identified'". BBC News. 17 June 2017. Archived from the original on 16 June 2017.
  39. ^ Hills, Joe (15 June 2017). "Grenfell Tower: Original proposed contractor was dropped to reduce cost of refurbishment project". ITV News. Archived from the original on 16 June 2017. Retrieved 16 June 2017.
  40. ^ Eder, Sebastian (14 June 2017). "Feuerwehr-Chef im Gespräch: Warum ein Feuer wie in London in Deutschland unwahrscheinlich ist" [Fire Department Chief in Interview: Why a Fire like the one in London is unlikely in Germany]. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (in German). Archived from the original on 15 June 2017. Retrieved 16 June 2017.
  41. ^ a b Knapton, Sarah; Dixon, Hayley (16 June 2017). "Eight failures that left people of Grenfell Tower at mercy of the inferno". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 16 June 2017. Retrieved 20 June 2017.
  42. ^ Kirkpatrick, David D.; Hakim, Danny; Glanz, James (24 June 2017). "Why Grenfell Tower Burned: Regulators Put Cost Before Safety". The New York Times. New York. p. A1. Retrieved 25 June 2017.
  43. ^ Architects fear Grenfell review will avoid ban on flammable cladding The Guardian
  44. ^ "Lakanal House tower block fire: deaths 'could have been prevented'". The Guardian. 28 March 2013. Retrieved 20 April 2019.
  45. ^ a b "Four ministers were warned about tower block fire risks". BBC News. 19 June 2017. Retrieved 8 June 2018.
  46. ^ a b Revealed: the tower block fire warnings that ministers ignored Archived 18 June 2017 at the Wayback Machine The Guardian
  47. ^ "Building Regulations - Approved Document B 2006 (Fire Safety) Volume 1 (Dwelling Houses)" (PDF). All-Party Parliamentary Fire Safety & Rescue Group. 12 March 2014. Retrieved 21 June 2017.
  48. ^ Booth, Robert (4 February 2019). "Experts warned of fire-spread risks two years before Grenfell". The Guardian. Retrieved 4 February 2019 – via www.theguardian.com.
  49. ^ "The politics of a tragedy". The Economist. 16 June 2017. Retrieved 19 June 2018.
  50. ^ "Labour's politicisation of the Grenfell Tower disaster is sinister". Daily Express. 17 December 2017. Retrieved 19 June 2018.
  51. ^ "Grenfell is political. The right can't make that fact go away". The Guardian. 26 June 2017. Retrieved 19 June 2018.
  52. ^ "Why we must politicise the tragedy of Grenfell Tower". 16 June 2017. Retrieved 19 June 2018.
  53. ^ "Owen Jones: The old Tory order is crumbling – it's taken Grenfell for us to really see it". The Irish Times. 22 June 2017. Retrieved 19 June 2017.
  54. ^ "Grenfell Tower fire: support for people affected - GOV.UK". www.gov.uk. Retrieved 17 June 2017.
  55. ^ "London fire: Prime minister orders full public inquiry". BBC News. Archived from the original on 15 June 2017. Retrieved 15 June 2017.
  56. ^ Kuenssberg, Laura (15 June 2017). "Huge challenge of Grenfell will test fragile government". BBC News. Archived from the original on 16 June 2017. Retrieved 16 June 2017.
  57. ^ "The Guardian view on Grenfell Tower: Theresa May's Hurricane Katrina". The Guardian. 15 June 2017. Archived from the original on 15 June 2017. Retrieved 16 June 2017.
  58. ^ "PM criticised for failing to meet Grenfell Tower fire survivors". Sky News. Sky UK. 16 June 2017. Archived from the original on 17 June 2017. Retrieved 17 June 2017.
  59. ^ "Grenfell Tower latest: London fire death toll rises to 30 as anger grows over safety failings". The Telegraph. London, UK. Archived from the original on 16 June 2017.
  60. ^ "Theresa May heckled by angry crowds". BBC News. 16 June 2017. Retrieved 5 February 2020.
  61. ^ Parris, Matthew. "Matthew Parris on Theresa May". The Times. Retrieved 16 June 2017.
  62. ^ "Andrea Leadsom confronted over PM not meeting Grenfell Tower victims". Sky News. Sky UK. 16 June 2017. Archived from the original on 16 June 2017. Retrieved 17 June 2017.
  63. ^ May, Theresa (11 June 2018). "I made mistakes but one year on I'm going Green for Grenfell, writes Theresa May". The Evening Standard. Retrieved 11 June 2018.
  64. ^ a b Slawson, Nicola (9 June 2017). "Labour rounds off remarkable election with narrow victory in Kensington". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 16 June 2017. Retrieved 17 June 2017.
  65. ^ Amelia Gentleman, "'Unforgivable': local Labour MP vents fury over Grenfell Tower fire" Archived 15 June 2017 at the Wayback Machine
  66. ^ Grenfell Tower fire: Sadiq Khan calls on PM to appoint commissioners BBC
  67. ^ Grenfell campaigner calls for return of local assets as reparation The Guardian
  68. TheGuardian.com
    . 18 December 2020.
  69. ^ Booth, Robert (26 February 2021). "Grenfell Tower council apologises for putting profits before people in borough". The Guardian. Retrieved 26 February 2021.
  70. ^ "London fire: A visual guide to what happened at Grenfell Tower". BBC News. BBC. 16 June 2017. Archived from the original on 16 June 2017. Retrieved 17 June 2017.
  71. ^ "LOCAL ELECTIONS 2014: Conservatives control Kensington and Chelsea for 50th year in a row". SW London. Retrieved 8 July 2017.
  72. ^ "Notting Hill pastor blames 'disgusting' treatment of poor for inferno". London Evening Standard. 14 June 2017. Archived from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 17 June 2017.
  73. ^ a b "Kensington and Chelsea council has £274m in reserves". The Guardian. 19 June 2017.
  74. ^ "Look at Grenfell Tower and see the terrible price of Britain's inequality". The Guardian. 16 June 2017. Archived from the original on 16 June 2017. Retrieved 17 June 2017.
  75. ^ "New analysis of poverty in Kensington & Chelsea shows big divides between rich and poor". Trust for London.
  76. ^ a b iNews.co.uk. "A perfect storm of disadvantage: the history of Grenfell Tower". Retrieved 5 June 2017.
  77. ^ Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. "Wornington Green SPD – Second Draft Planning Brief: Parker Morris Standards". Archived from the original on 5 June 2018. Retrieved 5 June 2018.
  78. ^ a b Sabur, Rozina (17 June 2017). "Donations to fire victims may go to waste because council is failing to help co-ordinate efforts, volunteers say". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 17 June 2017. Retrieved 18 June 2017.
  79. ^ ‘Jail those responsible’: how Grenfell Tower residents’ grief turned to rage Archived 17 June 2017 at the Wayback Machine The Guardian
  80. ^ After Grenfell Tower unbridled anger won't make our homes any safer Archived 17 June 2017 at the Wayback Machine The Guardian
  81. ^ "Council attacked for stockpiling £274m despite Grenfell Tower residents' calls for fire safety improvements". The Independent. 17 June 2017. Retrieved 17 June 2017.
  82. ^ "Grenfell Tower residents 'still having rent payments taken out of bank accounts'". Independent. 1 July 2017.
  83. ^ Grenfell cladding approved by residents was swapped for cheaper version The Guardian
  84. ^ "Grenfell Tower fire: Government staff sent in to Kensington and Chelsea Council". BBC News. BBC. 18 June 2017. Archived from the original on 18 June 2017. Retrieved 18 June 2017.
  85. ^ a b "MP: 'Charity is doing government's work after Grenfell. It's an outrage, it's appalling'". The Independent. 18 June 2017. Archived from the original on 18 June 2017. Retrieved 18 June 2017.
  86. ^ "London fire: Sadiq Khan says tragedy caused by years of neglect". BBC News. 18 June 2017. Retrieved 5 February 2020.
  87. ^ Macaskill, Ewen (18 June 2017). "Council sidelined in Grenfell Tower response as leader refuses to quit". The Observer. Archived from the original on 18 June 2017. Retrieved 19 June 2017.
  88. ^ Foster, Dawn (14 June 2017). "A Very Political Tragedy". Jacobin. Retrieved 15 June 2017.
  89. ^ a b Travis, Alan (28 June 2017). "Grenfell Tower fire: was Tory austerity to blame or do problems date back to Blair?". The Guardian. Retrieved 28 August 2017.
  90. ^ "Grenfell Tower is Theresa May's Katrina moment – her political career cannot survive it". The Independent. 16 June 2017. Archived from the original on 16 June 2017. Retrieved 17 June 2017.
  91. ^ Chakrabortty, Aditya (20 June 2017). "Over 170 years after Engels, Britain is still a country that murders its poor". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 21 June 2017. Retrieved 22 June 2017.
  92. Press Association (16 July 2017). "John McDonnell says Grenfell Tower disaster was 'social murder'"
    . The Guardian. Retrieved 21 January 2018.
  93. ^ "Grenfell Tower fire: Kensington council halts meeting". BBC News Online. Retrieved 30 June 2017.
  94. ^ "Grenfell Tower fire: Fury as council halts meeting in 'absolute fiasco'". Sky News. Retrieved 30 June 2017.
  95. ^ "Kensington and Chelsea council leader steps down over response to Grenfell Tower fire". Metro. Associated Newspapers. 30 June 2017. Retrieved 30 June 2017.
  96. ^ Ruddick, Graham (23 August 2017). "Jon Snow: reporting on Grenfell made me feel on wrong side of social divide". The Guardian. Retrieved 24 August 2017.
  97. ^ "Backlash over Kensington Tories' Grenfell Tower leaflet". BBC News Online. Retrieved 14 November 2017.
  98. ^ Chris Johnston (14 November 2017). "Tories ask rich voters to rate importance of Grenfell Tower fire". Guardian newspapers.
  99. ^ Richard Vaughan (13 November 2017). "Tory activists condemned for asking residents to rate Grenfell Tower tragedy on scale of 0–10". i-news.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Criticism_of_the_response_to_the_Grenfell_Tower_fire&oldid=1210279459"