Economic methodology
Part of a series on |
Economics |
---|
Economic methodology is the study of methods, especially the scientific method, in relation to economics, including principles underlying economic reasoning.[1] In contemporary English, 'methodology' may reference theoretical or systematic aspects of a method (or several methods). Philosophy and economics also takes up methodology at the intersection of the two subjects.
Scope
This section is in prose. is available. (July 2012) |
General
social sciences
and, in particular, to:
- the definition of economics[2]
- the scope of economics as defined by its methods[3]
- fundamental principles and operational significance of economic theory[4]
- methodological individualism versus holism in economics[5]
- the role of simplifying assumptions such as rational choice and profit maximizing in explaining or predicting phenomena[6]
- descriptive/positive, prescriptive/normative, and applied[7] uses of theory[8]
- the scientific statusexpanding domain of economics[10]
- issues critical to the practice and progress of econometrics[11]
- the balance of empirical and philosophical approaches[12]
- the role of experiments in economics[13]
- the role of mathematics and mathematical economics in economics[14]
- the writing[15] and rhetoric of economics[16]
- the relation between theory, observation, application, and methodology in contemporary economics.[17]
Economic methodology has gone from periodic reflections of economists on method to a distinct research field in economics since the 1970s. In one direction, it has expanded to the
See also
- Economic systems
- Methodology of econometrics
- Model (economics)
Notes
- The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, v. 3, pp. 455-56.
• Daniel M. Hausman, 1989. "Economic Methodology in a Nutshell", Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(2), pp. 115-127.
• Kevin D. Hoover, 1995. "Review Article: Why Does Methodology Matter for Economics?" Economic Journal, 105(430), pp. 715-734. - ^ • John Stuart Mill, 1844. "On the Definition of Political Economy; and on the Method of Investigation Proper to It", Essay V, in Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy.
• Roger E. Backhouse and Steven Medema, 2008. "economics, definition of", The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edition. Abstract.
• _____. 2009. "Retrospectives: On the Definition of Economics", Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(1), pp. 221–33 (close Bookmarks tab) Abstract. - ^ John Neville Keynes, 1891. The Scope and Method of Political Economy. Annotated chapter links. 4th ed., 1917 [1999]. Full Contents.
- Paul A. Samuelson, 1947. Foundations of Economic Analysis.
• Richard G. Lipsey, 2008. "positive economics." The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. 2nd Edition. Abstract.
• Lawrence A. Boland, 2008. "instrumentalism and operationalism", The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edition. Abstract.
• _____, 2003. The Foundations of Economic Method, 2nd Edition. Description and chapter links. - Cass R. Sunstein, 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale. Description and preview.
• Shiozawa, Y. 2004 Evolutionary Economics in the 21st Century: A Manifest, Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, 1(1): 5-47. - [1987] 1989. "Economic theory and the hypothesis of rationality", in The New Palgrave: Utility and Probability, pp. 25-39..
• Duncan K. Foley, 2004. "Rationality and Ideology in Economics", Social Research, pp. 329-342. Pre-publication version Archived 2003-08-11 at the Wayback Machine
• Thomas J. Sargent, 1994. Bounded Rationality in Macroeconomics, Oxford. Description and chapter-preview 1st-page links.
• Vernon L. Smith, 2008. Rationality in Economics: Constructivist and Ecological Forms, Cambridge. Description/contents links and preview. - ^ • David Colander (1992). "Retrospectives: The Lost Art of Economics", Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6(3), pp. 191-198.
• John Neville Keynes, 1891. The Scope and Method of Political Economy. ch. I-II. Annotated chapter links. 4th ed., 1917 [1999]. Full Contents. - .
- ^ • Lionel Robbins, 1932. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science.
• Richard G. Lipsey, 2009. "Some Legacies of Robbins' An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science", Economica, 76(302), pp. 845-56 (press + button).
• Alexander Rosenberg (1983). "If Economics Isn't Science, What Is It?" Philosophical Forum, 14, pp. 296-314. Reprinted in M. Martin and L. C. McIntyre (1996), Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science, pp. 661-674.
• Douglas W. Hands, 1984. "What Economics Is Not: An Economist's Response to Rosenberg", Philosophy of Science, 51(3), p p. 495-503.
• Daniel M. Hausman, 1992. The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics. Description, to ch. 1 link, preview, and reviews, 1st pages: [1][2]. - George J. Stigler, 1984. "Economics—The Imperial Science?" Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 86(3), p p. 301-313.(press +). Reprinted in Jack Hirshleifer, 2001, The Dark Side of the Force: Economic Foundations of Conflict Theory, ch.14, pp. 306- 42.
• Ben Fine, 2000. " Economics Imperialism and Intellectual Progress: The Present as History of Economic Thought?" History of Economics Review, 32, pp. 10-36 Archived 2012-04-26 at the Wayback Machine.
• Jack Hirshleifer, 1985. "The Expanding Domain of Economics", American Economic Review, 75(6), pp. 53-68
•Gary S. Becker, 1976. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Description and preview., also in 1993, Journal of Political Economy, 101(3), pp. 383-409.
• _____, 1992. "The Economic Way of Looking at Life." Nobel Lecture link - Stephen T. Ziliak, 1996. "The Standard Error of Regressions", Journal of Economic Literature, 34(1), pp. 97–114.; McCloskey and Ziliak, "Signifying Nothing: Reply to ..." [preprint] and Hoover and Siegler, [permanent dead link] "... Rejoinder to ..., pp. 39–68;
• Kevin D. Hoover and Mark V. Siegler, 2008. "Sound and Fury: McCloskey and Significance Testing in Economics", Journal of Economic Methodology, 15(1), pp. 1–37
• Edward J. Nell and Karim Errouaki, 2011. Rational Econometric Man,Part I and ch. 10. Edward Elgar. - Frank H. Knight, 1924. "The Limitations of Scientific Method in Economics", in The Trend of Economics, R.G. Tugwell, ed., pp. 229-67. Reprinted in Frank H. Knight, 1935 [1997], The Ethics of Competition, pp. 97- 139.
•Daniel M. Hausman, 1983. "The Limits of Economic Science", in The Limits of Lawfulness: Studies on the Scope and Nature of Scientific Knowledge, N. Rescher, ed. Reprinted in D.M. Hausman, 1992, Essays on Philosophy and Economic Methodology, pp. 99-108.
• Ludwig von Mises, 1949. Human Action.
• Bruce Caldwell, [1987] 2008. "positivism", The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edition. Abstract. - ^ • C.F. Bastable, [1925] 1987. "experimental methods in economics", i, The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, v. 2, p. 241.
• Vernon L. Smith, [1987] 2008a. "experimental methods in economics", The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edition. Abstract.
• _____, 2008b. "experimental economics", The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edition, Abstract.
• Herman O. Wold (1969). "Econometrics as Pioneering in Nonexperimental Model Building", Econometrica, 37(3), p p. 369-381. - W. Stanley Jevons, 1879. The Theory of Political Economy, 2nd ed., ch. I, "Introduction", pp. 1-29.409.
• Paul A. Samuelson, 1952. "Economic Theory and Mathematics — An Appraisal", American Economic Review, 42(2), pp. 56-66.
• D.W. Bushaw and R.W. Clower, 1957. Introduction to Mathematical Economics, pp. vii-viii and ch. 1, pp. 3-8.
• Gérard Debreu, ([1987] 2008). "mathematical economics", The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edition. Abstract. (First published with revisions from 1986, "Theoretic Models: Mathematical Form and Economic Content", Econometrica, 54(6), pp. 1259-1270.)
• _____ 1991. "The Mathematization of Economic Theory", American Economic Review, 81(1), pp. 1-7. Archived 2008-12-31 at the Wayback Machine
• Robert W. Clower, 1994. "Economics as an Inductive Science", Southern Economic Journal, 60(4), pp. 805-814.
• _____, 1995. "Axiomatics in Economics", Southern Economic Journal, 62(2), pp. 307-319.
• Mark Blaug, 2003. "The Formalist Revolution of the 1950s", Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 25(2), pp. 145-156. Abstract. Reprinted in Warren J. Samuels, et al., ed., 2003, A Companion to the History of Economic Thought, Wiley, pp. 395-
• _____, 1998. "Disturbing Currents in Modern Economics", Challenge, 41(3), pp. 11-34. Reprint.
•social choice", The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edition. Abstract. - ^ • William Thomson, 1999. "The Young Person's Guide to Writing Economic Theory,"
Journal of Economic Literature, 37(1), pp. 157-183.
• _____, 2001. A Guide for the Young Economist: Writing and Speaking Effectively about Economics. Chapter-preview links.
• Eric Rasmusen, 2001. "Aphorisms on Writing, Speaking, and Listening", in E. Rasmusen, ed., Readings in Games and Information, pp. 389-420. PDF. Archived 2015-08-09 at the Wayback Machine
• Donald McCloskey, 1985. "Economical Writing", Economic Inquiry, 23(2), pp. 187-222. Archived 2011-05-12 at the Wayback Machine
• David N. Laband and Christopher N. Taylor, 1992. "The Impact of Bad Writing in Economics", Economic Inquiry, 30(4), pp. 673-688. [3] Archived 2016-05-19 at the Wayback Machine - ^ • D.N. McCloskey, 1983. "The Rhetoric of Economics", Journal of Economic Literature, 21(2), pp. 481-517.
• _____, [1985] 1998, 2nd ed. The Rhetoric of Economics. Chapter-preview links.
• Roger Backhouse, T. Dudley-Evans, and Willie Henderson, 1993. "Exploring the Language and Rhetoric of Economics", in Willie Henderson et al., Economics and Language, pp. 1-20 (preview)
• John Kenneth Galbraith, 1962. "The Language of Economics", Fortune, LXVI(6), Dec. pp. 12-30, 169, 31. Excerpt at [CNN] "FORTUNE: John Kenneth Galbraith, excerpts from his writing", May 17, 2006. - Bruno S. Frey, 2001. "Why Economists Disregard Economic Methodology, Journal of Economic Methodology, 8(1), pp. 41–47 Archived 2010-11-05 at the Wayback Machine.
- ^ Lawrence A. Boland, 2006. "Seven Decades of Economic Methodology: A Popperian Perspective", in Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment, v. 3, ed. Ian Charles Jarvie et al., pp. 219
- ISBN 0521558506
References
- John Bryan Davis, D. Wade Hands, Uskali Mäki (1998). Handbook of Economic Methodology, E. Elgar
- Hands, D. Wade, ed. (1993). The Philosophy And Methodology Of Economics, Duke University
- Hausman, Daniel M. (1984). The Philosophy of Economics: An Anthology. New York: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 052145929X
- Boland, L. (1982) The Foundations of Economic Method, London: Geo. Allen & Unwin.
- Boland, L. (1989) The Methodology of Economic Model Building: Methodology after Samuelson, London: Routledge.
- Boland, L. (1997) Critical Economic Methodology: A Personal Odyssey, London: Routledge
- Boland, L. (2003) The Foundations of Economic Method: A Popperian Perspective, London: Routledge
- D.N. McCloskey (1983). The Rhetoric of Economics, Univ of Wisconsin Press, 1998
- Daniel M. Hausman (1992). Essays on Philosophy and Economic Methodology, Cambridge University Press, 1992
- Nell, E.J. and Errouaki, K. (2011) Rational Econometric Man. Edward Elgar.
- Düppe, T. (2011). How Economic Methodology Became a Separate Science, Journal of Economic Methodology, 18 (2): 163-176.
External links
- Journal of Economic Methodology - page @ EconPapers
- Daniel M. Hausman, Philosophy of Economics (with focus on methodology), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
- Milton Friedman, "The Methodology of Positive Economics" (excerpts)