G101-class torpedo boat

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
A G101-class destroyer underway circa 1916
Class overview
BuildersGermaniawerft, Kiel
Operators Imperial German Navy
Built1912–1915
In commission1915–1918
Completed4
Lost4
General characteristics
TypeDestroyer
Displacement1,734 t (1,707 long tons) deep load
Length95.3 m (312 ft 8 in) oa
Beam9.47 m (31 ft 1 in)
Draught3.84 m (12 ft 7 in)
Installed power28,000 PS (28,000 shp; 21,000 kW)
Propulsion
Speed33.5 knots (62.0 km/h; 38.6 mph)
Range2,420 nmi (4,480 km; 2,780 mi) at 20 knots (37 km/h; 23 mph)
Complement104
Armament

The G101 class was a class of four large

scuttled at Scapa Flow
in 1919 and one sunk as a target by American aircraft in 1921.

Design

In 1910, the

Kaiserliche Marine.[2] The four French-built ships were also still building on the outbreak of the First World War and served with the French Navy as the Aventurier class.[3]

The four new ships were 95.3 metres (312 ft 8 in)

draught of 3.84 metres (12 ft 7 in). They displaced 1,116 tonnes (1,098 long tons) normal and 1,734 tonnes (1,707 long tons) full load. Three boilers fed steam to two sets of steam turbines rated at 28,000 shaft horsepower (21,000 kW) to give a speed of 33.5 knots (62.0 km/h; 38.6 mph). It was originally planned to fit the ships with two cruising diesel engines rated at 1,800 metric horsepower (1,800 bhp; 1,300 kW), but these ended up not being fitted. The ships had three funnels.[2] 500 t of oil was carried, giving a range of 2,420 nautical miles (4,480 km; 2,780 mi) at 20 knots (37 km/h; 23 mph).[4]

The Argentines planned to arm the ships with four 4-inch (102 mm) guns supplied by the American

high explosive shell a distance of 11,790 m (12,890 yd) at a rate of 15 rounds per minute. 120 rounds per gun were carried.[5] Six 50 cm (19.7 in) torpedo tubes were fitted,[6] and 24 mines could be carried.[2] These ships had a crew of 104 officers and ratings.[4][7]

Ships

Vessel[c][d] Launched[2] Completed[2] Fate
SMS G101 12 August 1914 4 March 1915 ex Santiago; Interned, Scapa Flow, 22 November 1918; scuttled 21 June 1919.
SMS G102 16 September 1914 8 April 1915 ex San Luis; Interned, Scapa Flow, 22 November 1918; beached while attempting to scuttle, 21 Jun 1919; to United States, 1920; sunk as aircraft target, 13 July 1921 off
Cape Henry
.
SMS G103 14 November 1914 15 May 1915 ex Santa Fé; Interned, Scapa Flow, 22 November 1918; scuttled 21 June 1919.
SMS G104 28 November 1914 5 June 1915 ex Tucuman; Interned, Scapa Flow, 22 November 1918; scuttled 21 June 1919

Service

The four ships were all completed in 1915, forming the 2nd Torpedo Boat Flotilla along with the other large torpedo boats of the B 97 class.[2][9] The G102s were slower than the B97s and as a result often operated separately.[10] While they were officially designated as torpedo boats, as the G102 class and B97 class were significantly larger than the existing torpedo craft of the German Navy, they were known as destroyers (Zerstörer) rather than torpedo boats.[6] All four ships were present at the Battle of Jutland.[11] Three ships of the class took part in the destruction of a convoy running between Norway and England on 11 December 1917.[12]

All four ships of the class survived the war and were interned at Scapa Flow, along with most of the rest of the

US Navy in 1921.[2]

Notes

  1. ^ SK stands for Schnellfeuerkanone – Quick firing cannon in German
  2. ^ L/45 refers to the length of the gun's barrel. In this case the barrel was 45 calibres long.
  3. Seiner Majestät Schiff
     ", or "His Majesty's Ship" in German.
  4. ^ The prefix letter on German torpedo craft indicated the ship's builder. G= Germaniawerft.[8]

Citations

  1. ^ Gardiner & Gray 1985, pp. 400, 402
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h Gröner 1983, p. 62
  3. ^ Gardiner & Gray 1985, p. 402
  4. ^ a b Gardiner & Gray 1985, p. 170
  5. ^ "German 8.8 cm/45". navweaps.com. 9 August 2009. Retrieved 3 September 2015.
  6. ^ a b Gardiner & Gray 1985, pp. 169–170
  7. ^ "German Destroyers & Torpedo Boats WW1". www.naval-history.net. Retrieved 2016-12-23.
  8. ^ Gardiner & Gray 1985, p. 164
  9. ^ Ruge 1972, p. 53
  10. ^ Campbell 1998, p. 27
  11. ^ Campbell 1998, p. 25
  12. ^ Ruge 1972, p. 66
  13. ^ Gröner 1983, pp. 54, 62

References

Further reading